Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NBC: Pentagon plans for an Iraqi civil war (including withdrawal)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:42 PM
Original message
NBC: Pentagon plans for an Iraqi civil war (including withdrawal)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11947773/

Pentagon and military officials say Iraq's not fighting a civil war yet, but warn that Iraqi security forces and the government could still collapse, dragging the country into one. So the U.S. military is drafting a series of contingency plans to deal with that very ominous possibility.

Military officials tell NBC News the first objective, however, is to head off a civil war. The U.S. military hopes to keep Iraqi security forces from taking sides in the sectarian violence by pressuring the Iraqi government to crack down on any rogue elements within the police or military.

The second option: U.S. forces could again be sent into combat against sectarian militias, which military officials say would require an increase in the number of American soldiers and Marines in Iraq.

And the last resort, if violence is spinning out of countrol: Military officials say they would also have to consider the possible withdrawal of American forces.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rsmith6621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hmmmmmm


And the last resort, if violence is spinning out of countrol: Military officials say they would also have to consider the possible withdrawal of American forces.


Especially if in August it looks like the PUGS are certianly going to be smeared in November....


Predictable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. August is W's vacation period, isn't it? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Pentagon plans for an Iraqi civil war
By Jim Miklaszewski
Correspondent
NBC News

WASHINGTON - Pentagon and military officials say Iraq's not fighting a civil war yet, but warn that Iraqi security forces and the government could still collapse, dragging the country into one. So the U.S. military is drafting a series of contingency plans to deal with that very ominous possibility.

Military officials tell NBC News the first objective, however, is to head off a civil war. The U.S. military hopes to keep Iraqi security forces from taking sides in the sectarian violence by pressuring the Iraqi government to crack down on any rogue elements within the police or military.

The second option: U.S. forces could again be sent into combat against sectarian militias, which military officials say would require an increase in the number of American soldiers and Marines in Iraq.

And the last resort, if violence is spinning out of countrol: Military officials say they would also have to consider the possible withdrawal of American forces.
....
Gen. William Wallace, the top military commander for the U.S. invasion of Iraq, blames it on a series of miscalculations from the start.

"I do fault myself and others for not questioning, perhaps, or challenging some of the assumptions that were made," says Wallace.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11947773/from/RS.2/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. So they are proving that the VP and P are lying? Shucks.
More loathing here. That's it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 12:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. What a huge responsibility to make such difficult decisions
of course we wouldn't be making them if we hadn't gone in there in the first place. What a burden to have responsibility for sending troops into a wholesale slaughter or getting them the hell out of there. Man, and then mixing in the politics of when, where, and how this affects elections. Some president after, George, will have to make the decision. He said no pull out on his watch. They are digging in over there with lots of permanent bases. The troops are over there to protect the oil production. It ought to be made private and let the Iraqis and the contractors and Halliburton work it out. They ought to have to buy those bases. The American people should have that tax money back...returned to our national treasury. Our version of Democracy has turned into Anarchy and civil war. If Iraq wants to do business with the Oil companies let them do business. My tax dollars have no business subsidizing the welfare of oil companies with gigantic quarterly profit margins. My government is not meant to be a negotiator, go between, moderator, between the Iraq government and Big Oil. This whole war is a sham and being fought on false pretenses in the behalf of the Oil lobbists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. But BUSH just said things in Iraq are IMPROVING.
Ya mean he was just fulla SHIT???! :wow:

bush; THE stupidest MFing war criminal. EVER.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
5. I can visualize the helicopters picking up reporters from the hotel's roof
as we beat a hasty retreat from Iraq.

FUBAR!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Heh, They'll leave the reporters.
It will be after all, their fault for not reporting the good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yeah, the chimp said happy days were hear again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. Why do I think...
that civil war could probably be prevented IF the US withdrew?

The Iraqis are figuring it out...the US is never leaving.


Iraqis Think U.S. in Their Nation to Stay
....

Are the Americans here to stay? Air Force mechanic Josh Remy is sure of it as he looks around Balad.

"I think we'll be here forever," the 19-year-old airman from Wilkes-Barre, Pa., told a visitor to his base.

The Iraqi people suspect the same. Strong majorities tell pollsters they'd like to see a timetable for U.S. troops to leave, but believe Washington plans to keep military bases in their country.

The question of America's future in Iraq looms larger as the U.S. military enters the fourth year of its war here, waged first to oust President
Saddam Hussein, and now to crush an Iraqi insurgency.

....
"The coalition forces are moving outside the cities while continuing to provide security support to the Iraqi security forces," English said.

The move away from cities, perhaps eventually accompanied by U.S. force reductions, will lower the profile of U.S. troops, frequent targets of roadside bombs on city streets. Officers at Al-Asad Air Base, 10 desert miles from the nearest town, say it hasn't been hit by insurgent mortar or rocket fire since October.

Al-Asad will become even more isolated. The proposed 2006 supplemental budget for Iraq operations would provide $7.4 million to extend the no-man's-land and build new security fencing around the base, which at 19 square miles is so large that many assigned there take the Yellow or Blue bus routes to get around the base, or buy bicycles at a PX jammed with customers.

AP Lots of Detail in the story--good read
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "I think we'll be here forever," Think Germany and Japan
.
.
.

USA is like a virus

It never leaves ya unless "treated"

And noone has got the balls yet to evict the only country that has used nuclear weapons

ON A COUNTRY THAT WAS TRYING TO SURRENDER!!

The bully on the block is still winning

But his time will come

History as far as recorded time reads

"The rise and FALL of the ____________ empire"

United States of America is next

Count on it

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Might be worst than that...
You know if you start playing with the WW1 era...the US domestically is starting to look like the Weimar Republic, where the legislative branch was also rendered useless and contempible by the executive branch.

The US seems to be passing through to military dictatorship without Hindenburg's resignation.

It's like an oil exec said, "don't think of Iraq as a country any more, think of it as a military base with a huge oil reserve" at the center of the world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Iraq . . . "a military base with a huge oil reserve"
.
.
.

Sounds like a PNACers wet dream come true

(sigh)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. Even if it all calmed down tomorrow, and there weren't any more attacks
for months, that's no guarantee that all hell wouldn't bust loose a year from now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Will the Pentagon rebel against our neocon masters?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SLCPUNK Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh.........
So now they are ready to cut n run?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-22-06 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I believe its called "advancing to the rear"
A valuable military manuever in times like Viet Nam and IraqNam.

The sooner you learn that you are holding a chain saw by the wrong end, the quicker one should let go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC