Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq - Military train derails

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:28 PM
Original message
Iraq - Military train derails
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraq/0,,2-10-1460_1446028,00.html

Tikrit - A train transporting material for the American military derailed Saturday near Samarra, north of Baghdad, a spokesperson for the US 4th Infantry Division said.

"A train derailed north of Samarra this morning. The line appeared to be broken by some kind of explosion. The train was carrying army related material," the spokesperson said.

more

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
smallprint Donating Member (778 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. What's next --- a blimp explosion?
Things are just going "off the rails" today.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. LOL...
"blimp explosion" made me laugh for 5 minutes! I know it is a sad event thread and it may be in poor taste (my reponse to your words) but dammit it made me laugh. We all need to sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jackpine Radical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Blimp explosion? No way.
Rush ain't planning to go anywhere near Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ripley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let's see train derailed, 2 blackhawks down...
Could this be what they mean by progress?

Or maybe our supply lines and transports are being hit by someone with pretty good military knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. It's not Saddam, that's for sure!
Saddam was a thug and a total failure as military strategist. There is some real smart strategy behind all of this. It is clear by now that the bombing of the UN, the Red Cross, and the Carabinieri barracks, were not acts of terrorism, but part of a military campaign to further isolate the US from getting any assistance in Iraq from NGOs and allied countries.

The war in Afghanistan bankrupted the USSR, the war in Iraq is bankupting the US in the same manner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What makes you say Saddam was a failure as a
military strategist?

I've heard a few know-nothings on the Repug side try to plant that meme, but I've never seen anything approaching credible analysis that said that. Maybe I missed it.

What is the basis for your claim?

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The Gulf War for one!
Concentrating his troops expecting a naval landing, which never came, and making them easy targets for our Air Force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molok555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Maybe Saddam has decided to read...
I can't remember where I read this online, but the strategy is apparently classic Sun Tzu:

1) Attack the enemy's strategy (Shock & Awe coming? Run away, melt into the local population. Give 'em no one to Shock & Awe. Except the locals, of course, who, as part of the enemy's strategy, are to be spared).

2) Attack the enemy's alliances (Pretty self-explanatory. UN, ICRC, Italy, Poles, and any other nation by extension).

3) Attack the enemy forces (Begun in earnest about a month ago (pin pricks, previously). M1A1, Black Hawk, Chinook, Black Hawk, Black Hawk x2).

What's next, Mr. Sun?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secretshopper Donating Member (35 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. And the pin pricks were good for intelligence
By "sampling" what would work and how the response would go, you build some information about the real attacks, that seem to have begun for Ramadhan.

This shows many signs of excellent strategy, whether or not it's Saddam, his army, readers of The Art of War, Osama bin Laden, or the Hizb Allah.

These attackers are increasing in sophistication, and in success. The M1A1 Abrams tank that was disabled 28 August was a surprisingly sophisticated attack for a place that doesn't even have clean water or reliable lighting. The Chinook attack was also sophisticated.

I mentioned in another thread that chance plays a vital role in bringing down two Blackhawks, but the attackers are learning and adapting as they go. That's why they were ready and seized the opportunity that circumstance presented to them.

That has to be causing the planners to worry, and may be added incentive to sell off the country's assets to US companies, ratify the sneaky, illicit deals with a new, compliant government and constitution, and hightail it out of Dodge with as much cash as you can stuff in your pockets. I am referring of course to the Cheneys of the world, not the soldiers who get to do the dirty work.

The deadline of next year's election may help force Bush, Inc.'s hand, so I hope the democratic candidates keep the administartion's feet to the fire and drive home the message that soldiers are dying for lies and the personal enrichment of people already wealthier than anyone in the military will likely ever be.

Republicans who value personal integrity are a potential set of swing voters that are slowly awakening to the fact that their party is so far right that it's become fascist. They don't belong in there anymore than we do, so they may either stay home or vote for someone else.

And THAT'S a good outcome.

Secret Shopper
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. That was over a decade ago, and presumes no one ever learns
Care to update us on his lousy military strategy for THIS war?

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Saddam's strategy, or lack thereof, had little to do with the Gulf War
except that it may have been possible to prolong it for a few days with better strategy. Unless another country can control the air, every target is an easy target for us, and was relatively easy for us even back then. Iraq had no modern air power and only primitive air defenses.

I agree with your previous post that there is a strategy behind the recent series of attacks and that strategy is a part of a military campaign to further isolate the US.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mal Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. Everyone makes mistakes
And his mistake then was to try to fight conventionally. I refuse to believe someone who ruled a country like Iraq for so long, by force, against the will of the world superpower, is an idiot. The world is full of idiotic thugs, and all they end up being is muscle for someone else. To rise to power by yourself (ie, without the help of Daddy's name, money, and an aristocratic system) requires intelligence, guts, and a deficiency in humanity.
Learning from mistakes is a sign of intelligence, and if Saddam does have any hand in the resistance (a good chance, although there will be others involved, too, and 'freebooters'), then it looks like he learned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molok555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. What's the worst military blunder?
Fighting the LAST war. Saddam, or whoever is running this, appears to have learned that lesson. The neocons appear to have not. Shock & Awe is like a bad sequel to Desert Storm (y'know-moremoremore of the samesamesame. Plus, as pre Scream 2, the body count's gotta be higher).

As for Iraq's prep, check Scott Ritter:http://www.csmonitor.com/2003/1110/p09s02-coop.html?entryBottomStory

SNIP:"In the Baghdad suburb of Abu Ghraib is a compound on an abandoned airstrip that once belonged to a state organization known as M-21, or the Special Operations Directorate of the Iraqi Intelligence Service. As a UN weapons inspector, I inspected this facility in June of 1996. We were looking for weapons of mass destruction (WMD). While I found no evidence of WMD, I did find an organization that specialized in the construction and employment of "improvised explosive devices" - the same IEDs that are now killing Americans daily in Iraq."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
molok555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Like the Beastie Boys say:
"It's Sabotage!!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. finally going after supply lines, it seems
Edited on Sat Nov-15-03 01:35 PM by Aidoneus
I would think that would be Step 1 as far as base level harassment operations go, but I guess these people march to the beat of their own drummer and will get to it when they feel like it. I think there's been a couple other similar moves like this on the supply lines, but it seems that it's not as common as the direct attacks on convoys/helicopters/tanks/etc of the occupation forces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. They have been attacking US convoys all along
Isn't this the second train attack that we've heard about?

What with the news restrictions,you can bet there is much more that

we have not heard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. It's like a scene out of Lawrence of Arabia
except that it is our trains being derailed when they blowup the rail lines. This is the second military train to meet this fate. The first time, the train was looted by nearby villagers who helped themselves to computers, among other things.

Back to Kobe, Lacy, and Paris Hilton!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. I was thinking that too
They were the Turk's and the train was wrecked. Try and guard a railroad. Its really hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. What a fitting headline for the BFEE's bungled attack on Iraq
Kind of says it all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. exactly
I wonder when we'll be reading about Operation Shark Jump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. Once again, insurgency's intelligence proves itself n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ablbodyed Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. what does n/t mean?
A fairly newbie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. n/t means...
... no/text - all I have to say is in the subject line :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IMayBeWrongBut Donating Member (470 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. n/t means "no text"
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. this is awful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreatCaesarsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. is this any way to run a railroad?
this is the second supply train to be attacked and derailed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
23. Derailment in Samarra
http://topeka.isri.cmu.edu/~jusung/maugham.html

DEATH SPEAKS:

There was a merchant in Bagdad who sent his servant to market to buy provisions and in a little while the servant came back, white and trembling, and said, Master, just now when I was in the market-place I was jostled by a woman in the crowd and when I turned I saw it was Death that jostled me. She looked at me and made a threatening gesture; now, lend me your horse, and I will ride away from this city and avoid my fate. I will go to Samarra and there Death will not find me. The merchant lent him his horse, and the servant mounted it, and he dug his spurs in its flanks and as fast as the horse could gallop he went. Then the merchant went down to the market-place and he saw me standing in the crowd and he came to me and said, Why did you make a threatening gesture to my servant when you saw him this morning? That was not a threatening gesture, I said, it was only a start of surprise. I was astonished to see him in Bagdad, for I had an appointment with him tonight in Samarra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudnclear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
24. Hmmmm... notice this is outside the "triangle."
Glad we have them on the run.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #24
29. It means things are "improving" outside the "Sunni Triangle" now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC