pinkpops
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-15-03 09:46 PM
Original message |
cheney ignored war chaos alert |
E_Zapata
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-15-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
1. no offense.....but how's about clipping some of the article.......???? |
|
And I think (not sure) that you are supposed to do that in LBN.
Why should 850 different people have to click on a link and read the whole story, when, really.....we'd like a primer before we decide if we want to read the story.
There, I said it. I wish people wouldn't assume that they are actually posting VALUABLE information by copying a link into a message!
Pet peeve of mine, sorry.
|
leftchick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-15-03 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. I agree and here you go..... |
|
<snip>In some of the first direct evidence of serious divisions between the key allies in the run-up to the conflict, the former British Ambassador to Washington, Sir Christopher Meyer, said the US had failed to focus on what might happen after Saddam had been overthrown.
His admission raises serious questions that a lack of planning by US forces is at least partly to blame for Iraq's present security problems.
Last week 17 Italians and eight Iraqis were killed by a suicide bomber in the southern Iraqi town of Nasiriyah. It was the worst atrocity in the country for three months.
In an interview with The Observer, Meyer, who was ambassador just before the war began, said there were a series of meetings between British and American officials between the signing of the United Nations Resolution 1441 last November and the start of the war in March.
The British regularly raised their concerns about how much planning was going on to secure the country after Saddam, but the issue was largely ignored.
'One of the things that did not work out between us was a properly agreed strategy,' Meyer said.
'I suspect that a lot of things that we were saying to the Americans when we had a number of meetings towards the end of last year on post-Saddam strategy, a lot of those things have now been shown to be right.'
Meyer was referring to the security situation in Iraq, which critics say has been blighted by a lack of co-ordination between American forces and a lack of understanding about what the response of sections of the Iraqi population would be to the occupation.
|
Nlighten1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-15-03 09:48 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Cheney was expecting flowers from the Iraqis |
hang a left
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Nov-15-03 09:50 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Here ya go, from the above link: |
|
British warnings that America was failing before the war to prepare properly for a crumbling security situation in Iraq after Saddam Hussein was ousted were ignored by Vice President Dick Cheney and the Pentagon. In some of the first direct evidence of serious divisions between the key allies in the run-up to the conflict, the former British Ambassador to Washington, Sir Christopher Meyer, said the US had failed to focus on what might happen after Saddam had been overthrown.
His admission raises serious questions that a lack of planning by US forces is at least partly to blame for Iraq's present security problems.
Last week 17 Italians and eight Iraqis were killed by a suicide bomber in the southern Iraqi town of Nasiriyah. It was the worst atrocity in the country for three months.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:04 PM
Response to Original message |