Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lynching Comparison Furthers Divisiveness

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Khephra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:39 PM
Original message
Lynching Comparison Furthers Divisiveness
snip....

Supporters of President Bush's conservative nominees have used the word "lynching" to describe the treatment of judicial candidates by liberal opponents. African American political and civic leaders say that equating a challenge to a judge's nomination with the kidnappings, atrocities and murders that black Americans faced during more than a half-century of lynchings is inappropriate.

When Sen. Zell Miller (D-Ga.) invoked the term last week during his defense of judicial nominee Janice Rogers Brown, civil rights activist Wade Henderson called on Miller to apologize.

On the Senate floor Friday, Miller said that liberals who oppose Brown, a nominee to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, are upset because she is black, conservative and a woman. Liberals are essentially telling Brown, "Gal, you will be lynched" if she pursues her nomination, Miller said.

In a statement, Miller, a former governor of a state that was the scene of more lynchings than any other except Mississippi, said, "I think it sums up the situation accurately. The tragedy here does not lie in my floor speech. . . . The tragedy lies in what is happening in the United States Senate to this highly qualified conservative, African American jurist."

more..............

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45844-2003Nov15.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kcr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. When did Zell turn into an ass?
This is ridiculous. Comparing a filibuster to a lynching is so over the top as to be obviously offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. ZELL SHOULD LEAVE HIS SHEET IN THE CLOSET.
The tall white hood however, can be used as a chef's hat at the annual Young Republican Feast and Barbeque Day Celebration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. And he had the nerve to criticize Dean
We should also remember that "lynching" was the word Clarence Thomas used to describe his experience during the Anita Hill portion of his confirmation hearing. "High tech lynching." That was over the top too.

Eloriel
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. there is a big difference
There is a big difference between staying as a California Supreme Court Justice and being lynched.

Miller's tacky analogy trivializes lynchings and digustingly implies that everyone opposed to the extreme policies of Janice Rogers Brown are racist.

He should be ashamed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KeepItReal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Zel Miller knows no shame
If he had any, he'd apologize for calling himself a "Democrat" and switch parties already.

I'd have more respect for a Repub. in his Senate seat. The ending of his term will not come fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hee, hee... Ole zell is getting a good "smack down...."
SO richly deserved....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rwheeler31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
5. What has hurt that guy to make him so ugly?
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ummm...yeah, this is some of the stupidest
shit I've heard in a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. Any chance he will be at least censured by Senate Dem caucus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raenelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Another Uniter, Not a Divider--
This guy is whining that the Dems don't listen to Southerners, and I look at him while he's talking, and he spews contempt and venom for anyone who disagrees with him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sleipnir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Not really
They haven't done shit to him lately, though he needs a good asskicking into the rePug Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-03 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Miller has only hurt the country with his ignorance!
He is an "AS-HO-E"!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Angry over being proved wrong about racial equality
Edited on Sun Nov-16-03 11:24 AM by realpolitik
in the sixties, a whole generation of bigoted white Americans now gleefully use the terms that were used against their racist ideology in their own defense.

Remember that the legal arguments used for shrub were essentially the idea that he was being denied equal protection under the law. As if rich White Republican Males were an oppressed minority in Florida.

Ted Olsen is an intellectually diseased scag, aided by 5 whores in SCOTUS. This is *the* battle for the future. SCOTUS proved itself an injudicial body in 2000. It must be returned to a non partisan institution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
number6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-03 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. is Zell Miller an Asshole or what ?????????? !!!!
:thumbsdown:

what total and utter crap, how low can re-puke-ickcans
and thier sympathizers go ???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC