Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate bill shorts gear for troops

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 02:46 PM
Original message
Senate bill shorts gear for troops

http://www.fortwayne.com/mld/journalgazette/14389287.htm

Senate bill shorts gear for troops

WASHINGTON - A Senate measure to fund the war in Iraq would chop money for troops' night vision equipment and new battle vehicles but add $230 million for a tilt-rotor aircraft that has already cost $18 billion and is still facing safety questions.

President Bush's request for the emergency appropriations to cover costs of the continuing war and Hurricane Katrina recovery operations included no money for the troubled V-22 Osprey, which takes off and lands like a helicopter but flies like a plane.

The Marine Corps, however, followed up with a letter to lawmakers endorsing additional V-22s, noting that it is the only active production line capable of replacing four Vietnam War-era CH-46 choppers lost since Sept. 11, 2001.

Critics maintain that it's still a curious choice to be funded in a bill whose defining purpose is to replace equipment worn out or destroyed in Iraq.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MikeNearMcChord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Imagine if they had a war
and nobody showed up. Why enlist?:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Craig3410 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Support the Troops!
Put a $1.50 magnet or car!

As for paying a few more taxes to make sure they have up-to-date equipment? Oh well, screw them, they signed up for the Army.

(Please tell me I don't need a :sarcasm: tag)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
3. Maybe there's a couple million for some yellow ribbon magnets
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Support the Troops, my @$$ (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedEarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
5. That's outrageous
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShockediSay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. Wonder whose Abramoffs paid more
PUT THE BRAKES ON LOBBYIST CAMPAIGN contribution$/BRIBERY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fire Rumsfeld!
:grr:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
8. ASSHOLES!!!!!!!
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 06:06 PM by Breeze54
:grr:

AJC.com > Iraq coverage > Blog > Archives > 2006 > April > 10 > Entry
Preparing to go home hard work
By MONI BASU | Monday, April 10, 2006, 05:44 AM
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution


Snip--> The Armored Security Vehicles are new to most soldiers.

and

On a recent afternoon, Sgt. Daniel Muns, a soccer coach from Columbus,
and two other soldiers from Bravo Company, 2nd Battalion, 121st Infantry Regiment,
were training soldiers from the Lincoln, Neb.,
Army Reserve unit on the new Armored Security Vehicles.


The Armored Security Vehicles are new to most soldiers.
Bravo Company has only been using them for a month.
<--Snip :wtf:

Now these soldiers just started coming home on Wednesday night and they lost 26
and had over 200 injured and they "just got NEW Armored vehicles"????


:nuke: :grr:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. "They've hijacked the bill to spend money on their toys"
- Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense.
That statement basically sums it up.

Not only does the V-22's manufacturer get "emergency" funding,
but Boeing also gets cash to start making more C-17 transport
planes. The Pentagon sure has its priorities straight. :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caligirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. No one can hear you scream from a CH 46!- hubby use to fly them
Edited on Thu Apr-20-06 10:08 PM by caligirl
So what states are the Tilt Rotors built in. Hmm Boeing and Bell are in Texas and Illinois? Looks like the long road to finally replace the bullet riddled 46 is finally about to arrive. They were pushing these in the 80's when congress decided the F18 was needed to replace the F4. The 46 pilots have been flying crap, reworked crap and refitted crap since Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flordehinojos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
11. the senate is controlled by republicans.please remember thatnext time they
venture out blaming the democrats!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:05 AM
Response to Original message
12. Interesting choice of dates.
I wasn't aware we lost a CH-46 on September 11, 2001.

Why not put 12.31.1999?

it is the only active production line capable of replacing four Vietnam War-era CH-46 choppers lost since Sept. 11, 2001.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It is. Or why not "since the beginning of the Iraq War"?
Either would be a logical choice, but "since 9/11" has propaganda value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC