Emillereid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-17-03 04:31 PM
Original message |
U.S. Army Prepares for Iraqi stay until 2006 |
|
http://www.menewsline.com/stories/2003/november/11_17_1.html WASHINGTON -- The U.S. Army has been quietly preparing for a stay in Iraq until at least 2006.
U.S. officials said the Central Command has completed a series of contracts that guarantee services and supplies for the next three years. The officials said these contracts include deals with Kuwaiti and Turkish firms...
This should be the companion article to the one purporting that the US plans on handing over military authority to international forces. When pigs fly ...
|
Brucey
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-17-03 04:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. There are 2 reasons the military has to stay: |
|
To protect the puppet, pro-US government from almost sure overthrow by Iraqis; and to keep profiteering for Bush-friendly corporations.
|
sventvkg
(448 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-17-03 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Which candidate says they will withdraw the troops and defer |
|
to International control in IRaq? I believe Dean and Clark Both say that but who else did?
|
jpgray
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-17-03 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
6. I thought Dean advocated remaining under UN auspices? (nt) |
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-17-03 05:40 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You know things are changing so fast |
|
that we may just leave becuase we have no choice, really
|
neuvocat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-17-03 05:43 PM
Response to Original message |
|
They said it would be 90 days!!!
(Wish I could say I'm surprised because I knew they would pull this stunt.)
|
dbt
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-17-03 06:05 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Bit long for a Cakewalk, innit? Lyin' sonsabitches!
:grr: dbt
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |