Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Terrorism Panel Subpoenas Tapes From New York

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-20-03 11:57 PM
Original message
Terrorism Panel Subpoenas Tapes From New York
The federal commission investigating the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks announced on Thursday that it had issued a subpoena to New York City for a variety of police tapes and other material related to the attacks. The panel said the city's refusal to hand over the material had "significantly impeded the commission's investigation."

The 10-member commission said the subpoena required the city to turn over tapes and transcripts of emergency 911 calls made that day, as well as transcripts of hundreds of interviews of firefighters that were conducted after the attacks.

Aides to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg said he intended to challenge the subpoena, raising the prospect of a lengthy court battle with the independent commission. A statement issued by City Hall said that the mayor was "dismayed" by the subpoena and that the city had offered to share material with the commission after it was edited to remove the "intensely emotional statements of people who lost their lives or whose lives were in jeopardy" on Sept. 11.

<snip>
In a statement on Thursday, the panel said "the city's failure to produce these important documents has significantly impeded the commission's investigation," adding that the initial request for the police tapes and other material was made four months ago. "Given its statutory deadline," it said, "the commission cannot wait any longer for these vital records." The commission must file a final report by May 2004.

more...
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/11/21/politics/21TERR.html?ex=1069995600&en=0abbafa2a30f4d1d&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 12:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good grief, what's going on here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I don't know...
but it brings to mind the Warren Commission complete with ommissions and outright lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dfong63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. what an incredibly lame excuse
A statement issued by City Hall said that the mayor was "dismayed" by the subpoena and that the city had offered to share material with the commission after it was edited to remove the "intensely emotional statements of people who lost their lives or whose lives were in jeopardy" on Sept. 11.

does anyone really believe this bs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annagull Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 03:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. just give us the NORAD tapes, hmkaaay?
This request is only to remind of the shock and capitalize on the emotions. The grist of the matter is:

What stopped NORAD from reacting for almost 2 hours.

and

Who whisked the Bin Ladens' out of the US on September 12th?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gandalf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-21-03 04:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. But only conspiracy nuts are astonished about 3rd subpoena
Naturally, on the whole, the 9/11 occurred as meticulously reported by the media. No reason to believe that the official institutions has anything to hide.
It is really incredible!
Why do they have to get the basis for their work by subpoenas? Keeping in mind that the commission’s time is strictly limited, that is a clear proof of obstruction by official institutions.
And the reason given by Bloomberg is really absurd. Why should his staff read the documents and the “intensely emotional statements”, but not the commission who has to fulfill a task of the utmost importance? (has it really?) The commissions' members have security clearances and have a high reputation.

The whole thing is only theater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC