House panel clears another $50 billion for Iraq

[cal04]

A U.S. House of Representatives subcommittee approved a bill on Wednesday that would give another $50 billion next year to President George W. Bush for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The House Appropriations defense subcommittee cleared a $427 billion bill to fund the Pentagon next fiscal year starting on October 1, including the additional $50 billion which was primarily for Iraq. The subcommittee passed its bill as House and Senate negotiators put final touches on an emergency measure for about $67 billion the Pentagon wants immediately to cover the wars' rising costs.

The next $50 billion bridge fund, which lawmakers expect to cover about six months, would bring the cost of both wars to nearly $450 billion, and many expect that to reach $500 billion by the end of next year. Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia, top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, said the Pentagon was spending about $8 billion a month on Iraq, where costs have climbed, and about $1 billion a month in Afghanistan. The House subcommittee approved its spending bill in a closed session. Congressional aides said the bill provides an additional $500 million to the National Guard to repair and replace equipment worn out in the wars.

The Senate has not yet taken up its version of the bill to fund the Pentagon next year. As lawmakers dealt with mounting public frustration over the Iraq war and its stunning cost, the full House was scheduled next week to debate a resolution on the war. House Speaker Dennis Hastert, an Illinois Republican, said Republicans on the International Relations Committee were preparing a resolution discussing reasons for the Iraq war as well as "our goals and views in fighting against terrorism."

Hastert's spokesman Ron Bonjean said the resolution was intended to be "very explicit -- Iraq is the main front" in the war on terror. Many Democrats contend that by invading Iraq, Bush diverted resources from fighting al Qaeda, which was responsible for the September 11, 2001, attacks. They say Bush falsely tried to link toppled Iraqi President Saddam Hussein with al Qaeda as an excuse for the war.

http://today.reuters.com/news/newsArticle.aspx?type=newsOne&storyID=2006-06-07T233952Z_01_N07277087_RTRUKOC_0_US-IRAQ-CONGRESS.xml

[bluestateguy]

1. That money should last, what, a week? Two weeks?

Next time they want money for the war they should go out and hold private fund raisers for it. I don't want to pay for it anymore!

[Earth_First]

2. $50 billion, which is expected to (only) last six months?

$450 billion combined thusfar?

What lunacy!

[Earth_First]

4. Or how about this...that's almost half a TRILLION dollars! n/t

[Solly Mack]

3. Halliburton needs more cash?

[LynnTheDem]

5. Good thing Iraqq\ & Afghanistan are both such a

CAKEWALK. :eyes:

Rightwingnuts; stupidest MFers ever hatched.

[BrotherBuzz]

6. A billion here...

a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money"

[Sadie5]

7. Bush plays war games

and spends money like he is printing it in the basement, yet social programs and Vet care are cut so that his rich friends can get their tax breaks.

[lonestarnot]

8. Throw'n money at it like a hot poker game, only a few of his cards

are miss'n.

[Mokito]

9. Ah yes...the war that pays for itself...

Ring any bells yet, *?

[High Plains]

10. It is time to quit funding this shit. Time for "no" votes.

Let's starve this war.