Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gephardt secures 21st labor endorsement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:01 PM
Original message
Gephardt secures 21st labor endorsement
Gephardt secures 21st labor endorsement

(11-20) 11:02 PST WASHINGTON (AP) --

Democratic presidential hopeful Dick Gephardt won the backing of his 21st international labor union Thursday, bolstering his grass-roots support in two states that hold early primaries.

The Transport Workers Union of America, which represents about 125,000 workers, said it is supporting the Missouri congressman because of the loyalty he has shown to the labor movement during nearly three decades in Congress.

The union, which represents workers in the mass transit, airline, railroad and utility industries, has about 9,000 members in Oklahoma -- more than any other union -- and 5,000 members in Arizona. Both states are among those holding primaries Feb. 3.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/11/20/national1347EST0623.DTL

fear the turtle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fuck the turtle, he is a war criminal like Bush!
President, House Leadership Agree on Iraq Resolution



President George W. Bush along with bipartisan leaders from the House and Senate announced the Joint Resolution to authorize the use of the United States Armed Forces against Iraq. "The statement of support from the Congress will show to friend and enemy alike the resolve of the United States," President Bush said during the announcement in the Rose Garden, Wednesday, October 2, 2002. White House photo by Paul Morse.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021002-7.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JailBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Amen!
And who trusts unions any more?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Iowa- Gephardt 27, Dean 20
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Iowa is not America
Those idiots live on the ethanol program, one of the most wasteful government programs ever devised.

During the 2000 Republican debates, candidate John McCain tore the ethanol program to bits, while Bush reply was, and I quote, "I am an ethanol man." Bush won, but the American taxpayer lost once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. but the south and midwest is
and dean can't win there
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. As long as the prowar candidates lose
I don't care which of the antiwar candidates wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La_Serpiente Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I must say
a lot of people will be pissed if Gephardt wins the nomination. His foreign policy views are practically the same as Bush's (in my opinion at least)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. anybody but bush
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. A Bush clone is still a Bush
and those that voted for IWR and PATRIOT Act, and are still unrepentant about their votes, are nothing but Bush clones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I agree, I dont like his foriegn policy views
Then again the only foriegn policy views I really only have a lot of use for are Kucinich's, yeah I admit it, I wanna make war archaic NOW so shoot me and call me an idealistic hippy pacifist because I am sick of war. What I do like about Gephardt is his economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leovigild Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Gephardt is the most likely to win
Of course the kamikaze left won't support Gephardt. Nothing would please them more than a 45 state Republican landslide so they can remain righteously indignant.

Gephardt with his strong position on trade can carry the Carolinas whereas Dean never will.

I suspect that Gephardt will be far more successful at securing black support than "gay marriage" Dean. Southern black voters tend to be fundamentalist Christian so they won't care much for West Hollywood cultural baggage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loyalsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Too bad he'll have trouble winning his own state, though
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 08:55 PM by loyalsister
Anyone for whom that is even a question is an absolutely ridiculous possibility for a candidate. He has been a huge gun control proponent, and it has been a hot button issue here. The gun nuts are mobilized, and a lot of them are people who would vote for someone like Clark or Dean.

As for the left. He didn't just vote in favor of IWR. He coauthored the house version. He is truly a partner in cirm to our worst worldly circumstances right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leovigild Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Gun Nuts ?
Do you think there is any conceivable way an NRA type would ever vote for Dean ? Do you think the NRA is seething with pro-choice gay rights supporters ? Do you think the NRA is seething with antiwar activists ?

Dean's possition on guns will not win him any votes because gun voters are conservative, pure and simple. Dean is the incarnation of everything they despise.

And as for Iraq I would point out that most Americans at one point did support it.

Let's look at the Vietnam analogy. The antiwar movement had three components.

1. Joan Baez. Pacifists who had always opposed the war from the beginning.

2. William Kunstler. People who were not doves but hawks for the other side. The ones waving North Vietnamese flags.

3. Clark Clifford. People who supported the war at the beginning but turned against it because it went on too long and cost too much.

Most opponents of the Vietnam War fell into category 3. They were disillusioned hawks after Tet. They never had any use for categories 1 and 2 and felt uneasy about being associated with them. That is why the antiwar left collapsed so quickly after 1973. That is why it was not the dominant political force of the 70's and 80's and was unable to put McGovern into the White House or keep Reagan out.

Now, most people opposed to Iraq are category 3. They are uneasy about San Francisco peace types. That is why running on Iraq will be as unsuccesful for Dean as running on Vietnam was for McGovern.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carolina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. I can see the GOP ad now
Grim voice:

Gephardt could not keep his leadership position among House Democrats (captioned photo of Nancy Pelosi)

Yet now he thinks he can lead America!

Drum roll:

Gephardt has stood with President Bush (infamous Rose Garden photo).

Yet now he wants to replace him.

Gephardt: he can't lead his fellow liberal(said sneeringly) Democrats; but he does follow our leader (presidential photo of Bush with a flag in the background)

For Leadership, Vote Bush-Cheney 2004 (Pan to beautiful, patriotic scene with smiling faces)
___________________________________________________________________
With Gephardt at the helm, we're toast!







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SadEagle Donating Member (664 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. aiee, my eyes!
Is this some ugly tie competition?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Here-here!!!!...............World Criminal Court for him too!!!
What a waste of support!!!

This is why unions are weak in 2003!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. another union endorsement
Although hes not my candiate I like him for his union views, good for Gephardt. BTW who have the miners endorsed? I wanna see what my personal unions are thinkin that is the ones my family has connections to, the steelworkers national union endorsed Gephardt but I know my candiate is pretty popular with them too. Cool for Gephardt although I dont even know what number he is on my list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. fear the turtle
Indeed! I think Gephart may be the most overlooked candidate in this entire race. So little attention is paid here, but in real life, union members have real clout in Democratic circles. We shall see, but I can easily see a scenario where Gephart wins the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Democrats will lose if they nominate Gephardt
and this union member won't vote for him on account of Gephardt's role in the IWR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Please understand, IGephart is WAY down my list
6th in fact. I just think it would be a mistake to underestimate him, considering his union backing. I think he would be an utter disaster of a nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Zanti Regent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Toss the Pink Tutu, Limp Dick!
Bartcop nails this fool right on the button when he dances around Bush in his pink tutu.

Anyone who gave Bush a blank check to turn my nephew into a quadraplegic will NOT get my vote, and that includes Limp Dick, Wimpy Kerry, Edwards and Looneyman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Hear, hear!
I will never support the four Bush enablers, Dickless Gephardt among them.

I support the antiwar candidates: Clark, Dean, Kucinich, Mosley-Braun.

Sharpton struck out long ago during the Tawana Brawley case, but at least he didn't support the invasion of Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leovigild Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Of course the kamikaze left won't support Gephardt
Democratic voters aren't interested in noble failure. They aren't interested in a candidate who can only carry Manhattan, West Hollywood, college towns, and inner cities. They want one who can actually win.

Vote green if you like. But blacks have no use for romantic failure. Blacks understand that 50% of something is better than 100% of nothing.

The key thing is to rebuild as much as possible of the New Deal coalition. This can be done on economic issues using the anger against free trade that is surging across people who normally vote Republican (peek over at the 100+ angry responses on any free trade, or free traitor as they would put it, thread on FR). A strong Gephardt economic message, avoiding the pitfal of cultural issues, can bring back southern voters. Never forget that the religious right voter is the grandchild of a New Deal Democrat and the great great grandchild of a William Jennings Bryan Populist. It can be done on health care. It cannot be done on gay rights or Iraq because culture war issues favor conservatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crowdance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. He also did nothing to stop the abortion ban
He couldn't be bothered showing up for the house vote on the abortion ban, and is officially recorded as not present. I refuse to support any candidate who won't support my daughers' right to bodily sovereignty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born Free Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
21. Part of the good ol boy network
Edited on Sat Nov-22-03 08:12 PM by Born Free
This guy has been around a while and many old time union leaders don't like any change, they sure don't want to risk anything on someone outside their perception of the "mainstream" democrat. Unfortunately, Gephart is a loser, he had his chance many times over to stand up for America but chose to follow. Democrats need a leader, someone that is willing to speak out, someone that is not afraid to say things that might offend a few people that prefer the status quo. Republicans would love to see gephardt win the democratic nomination. The three names I watch for are Clark, Dean and Gore. If Gore responds to the "draft" he could shake things up a bit. If either two of the three combine, democrats have a strong team. Unfortunately, Will Rogers best described democrats many years ago when he send something like " I don't belong to any organised political party - I'm a demcrat"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
25. Check history
There has not been a Democratic congressman that has been elected President since at least 1850.

They have either been a Vice-President, a Senator, a Governor, or a war hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-22-03 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
27. Gephardt and Lieberman are at the bottom of my list for...
the Democratic Nomminee!

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 04:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC