Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Reserve battling an exodus

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 04:35 AM
Original message
Army Reserve battling an exodus
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2003/11/23/army_reserve_battling_an_exodus/

WASHINGTON -- The US Army Reserve fell short of its reenlistment goals this fiscal year, underscoring Pentagon fears that the protracted conflict in Iraq could cause a crippling exodus from the armed services.

The Army Reserve has missed its retention goal by 6.7 percent, the second shortfall since fiscal 1997. It was largely the result of a larger than expected exodus of career reservists, a loss of valuable skills because such staff members are responsible for training junior officers and operating complex weapons systems.

"The Army has invested an enormous amount of money in training these people, and they're very hard to replace," said John Pike of globalsecurity.org, an independent research group in Washington.

With extended deployments and increasingly deadly attacks by Iraqi guerrillas, Defense Department officials are scrambling to combat a broader downturn in retention and recruitment that they fear is on the horizon.
<snip>

Close the window, I feel a draft coming on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CRYINGWOLFOWITZ Donating Member (246 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. it isn't quite that simple
The days when 18 year olds could be drafted, given 2 months of training, a rifle and sent to some god forsaken place are long gone. We have a largely professional military, one in which training can take years. Not to mention it would be political suicide and Rove wouldn't approve it even if the Chinese invaded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Have you net seen all the requests for draft board volunteers?
The reserves are starting to dry up already. I'm to old for this one, but I remeber the chill of discovering my draft number was 12 back in '71.

I've had some of the people who are in the reserves working for me in the past that could barely read. I also have friends that are full bird Colonels. There's plenty of room for grunts in today's military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Bush's great refuge from the consequences of his war adventures
was the fact most Americans didn't feel personally involved.

Feels pretty drafty here in the Midwest, Billy_Pilgrim.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. afraid not....
The draft will happen if the lying chimpass* is reselected. Do you honestly believe they need "smart" people for cannon fodder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patriot_Spear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. I apologize in advance: you don't know what you're talking about
Edited on Sun Nov-23-03 07:25 AM by Patriot_Spear
I'm not trying to be harsh, but clearly you've never been in the military.

After I got out of the regular Army, I spent a few years in the Reserves. My unit's mission was simple- After activation we would pick up a batch of trainees and spend three months in OSUT (One Station Unit Training), whereupon we would then ship out as a filled out combat arms unit.

This type of mission is the principal behind the reserves; a core leadership to train raw recruits who then step up in to regular Army roles. Units rotated out of the line would then serve as a training cadre.

Get your facts straight- do you really think in a time of war our nation could wait YEARS for Soldiers to emerge from training?

SS has made it a goal, by next summer, to have their draft boards filled out and fully functioning, inducting civilians, in under two months, - Bush* has committed 28 million to this goal. There is definately movement right now in DC in the direction of bringing back the draft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. Chinese invaded? We are going to spend out selfs into a....
bloodless take over. They, the Chinese, are already holding alot of our debt. Wait to they start calling it in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 09:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. It never was just 2 months training.
It was basic training then you were sent to many more months of training in you MOS. For me it was a year at Ft Monmonth signal school.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nlighten1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. Political Suicide?
I am convinced that this President could sacrifice a baby on national TV and not get in one iota of political trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
23. You're kidding, right?? Legislation CURRENTLY in committee...
"Political suicide"? Only if the draft is actually enacted before the 2004 elections...after 2004 the Bushies will care even less what anyone thinks about their actions. But suppose a major terrorist event occurs anytime BEFORE the 2004 elections? Would it not be in keeping with the Junta to declare martial law and to cancel the elections?

The following two congressional bills are CURRENTLY in committee waiting for the green light to proceed to the voting process. Please note that these bills DO NOT allow deferments of any kind.

Additionally, please note that the last link is to the Selective Service System website...read carefully and you will find the authorization for $28 million to get the system ready for operation in mid-2005.

=========================================

H. R. 163:

To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons
in the United States, including women, perform a period of military
service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.

Mr. Rangel (for himself, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Lewis of
Georgia, Mr. Stark, and Mr. Abercrombie) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/useftp.cgi?IPaddress=162.140.64.21&filename=h163ih.txt&directory=/diskb/wais/data/108_cong_bills>

==========================================

S. 89:

To provide for the common defense by requiring that all young persons
in the United States, including women, perform a period of military
service or a period of civilian service in furtherance of the national defense and homeland security, and for other purposes.

Mr. Hollings introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

<http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/useftp.cgi?IPaddress=162.140.64.21&filename=s89is.txt&directory=/diskb/wais/data/108_cong_bills>

==========================================
SELECTIVE SERVICE SYSTEM
<http://www.sss.gov/perfplan_fy2004.html>

Excerpts:

"Strategic Goal 1: Increase the effectiveness and efficiency of the Manpower Delivery Systems (Projected allocation for FY 2004 – $7,942,000)"

...snip...

"Strategic Goal 2: Improve overall Registration Compliance and Service to the Public (Projected allocation FY 2004 – $8,769,000)"

...snip...

"Strategic Goal 3: Enhance external and internal customer service
(Projected allocation for FY 2004 – $10,624,000)"

...snip...

"Strategic Goal 4: Enhance the system which guarantees that each conscientious objector is properly classified, placed, and monitored.(Projected allocation for FY 2004 – $955,000)"

====================================







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. Isn't it set to begin in January 2005? It HAS to happen. There is no
other way for the Bush Crime Family to continue their murdering and pillaging without it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Is anyone paying attention or am I information overloaded? Didn't we just
see a post that a some Major Whore Media Crime Family just ran a story that recruitment was doing just fine!

Maybe it was I who posted it? LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 05:31 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Saw that. Kinda hard to keep a lie going with so many people
involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hadrons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. dArKeR, I think that was the reg. Army ....
Edited on Sun Nov-23-03 06:35 AM by hadrons
of course, they made their target of reenlistments of how many they NEEDED to keep AFTER dropping their stated goal of how many they WANTED to keep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I think they dropped their goal not once but TWICE as I remember
And as in Viet Nam the troops are finding out there are no SAFE areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MaineDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. It's easy to make your goal when the bar is always lowered
I remember reading that their goal was lowered a few times.

Spin, spin, spin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. OK, I'm mixed up as usual! Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yep, the Regular Army exceeded its recruitment goals last FY
What the story failed to tell was the fact that those recruitment goals were actually lowered TWICE because there was no way in hell they were going to make the original goal, then they saw they were falling short of the reduced number!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlabamaYankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. I believe they've also lowered the education requirement
For a while, I thought, the recriters weren't taking anybody without a high school diploma or GED. Then they lowered it to "c'mon in and we'll help you get your GED". Now, do they even worry about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. Army and recruits grapple with Iraq - MSGOP
Edited on Sun Nov-23-03 09:09 AM by dArKeR
For Robert, joining the Army last May was a no-brainer. With the job market stagnant and his hopes for a college education hanging in the balance, the Army’s promise to trade tuition for a three-year stint seemed like a good bet, especially since he was able to defer his enlistment for six months. Now, as his December induction date approaches, Robert is having second thoughts, like many other recruits who deferred enlistment.

http://www.msnbc.com/news/995062.asp

Do you think this is a government plan/conspiracy to force our poor children into the military? It's the only way millions of cildren can get medical insurance or a college eduction.

What a disgrace our country is! blackmailing our own children's lives. What would the military recruitment be if the US had universal medical coverage, a job for children in the private sector, and/or the ability to go to college without being blackmailed by our Federal Government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. The spanish speaking channels on cable
...in my area are loaded with Army recruitment commercials. I rarely see them on the english speaking channels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. See that here too.
Happy latinos wearing uniforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdove Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
19. We have to have draft
Otherwise only poor people will fight for the rich people.
I suggest draft Bush twins as a good example, then he will think more carefully before starting war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. Guess what? There is already a program under discussion that will...
...allow people with certain skills/education to join organizations that will count the same as military service.

Guess what level of people will qualify for working in such organizations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ConcernedCanuk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
20. Hmmmm ! Betcha Canada could "use' some of that "trained" personnel

. . They ARE talking of "beefing" up our Military - -

nah,

- it get's cold up here, most of our beer is stronger,

(OUR Budweiser is 5% and we got other beers up to 6.5% if ur in a hurry!!)

and what would ya do with that extra $$ y'all don't have spend on healthcare !

oh yah

- the other thing

we don't go to war much -

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
22. Look for a draft if * reSelected.
Look for U.S. troops coming home and U.N. and/or NATO taking over if * rightfully booted onto junk heap of history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
26. I am skeptical that they can wait until after the reSelection. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Noordam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-23-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Right EIGHT MONTHS
in VN time, it was normally 8 months from I DO to arrival in Nam.

3 months Basic Training
3 months Advance Ind. Training.
and around two months leave and slop between basic and ait going over.

So if they started TODAY passed a draft and starting drafting it would take 10-12 months before the draft placed people in Iraq.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC