Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boston Globe: Factual errors cited in cases against detainees

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 07:43 AM
Original message
Boston Globe: Factual errors cited in cases against detainees
Factual errors cited in cases against detainees

Lawyers demand new trial system at Guantanamo

By Farah Stockman, Globe Staff | July 14, 2006

WASHINGTON -- The US military's accusations against detainees at Guantanamo Bay contain
factual errors and some easily disproved assertions, according to declassified records,
raising questions about whether the US military has thoroughly investigated its cases
against the roughly 400 inmates.

For instance, one detainee is accused of belonging to an Al Qaeda cell "circa 1998,"
according to the summary of evidence prepared for his hearing. But Pentagon records show
the detainee was born in 1986, making him 11 or 12 in 1998.

In another case, a detainee stands accused of attending a terrorist training camp in July
2001. But copies of pay stubs show he was a chef in London at the time.

Defense lawyers say the cases underscore the need for new judicial procedures at Guantanamo,
as the Bush administration grapples with a Supreme Court ruling that struck down the system
of military trials at the base.
<snip>

Full article: http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/14/factual_errors_cited_in_cases_against_detainees
(Boston Globe - free reistration may be required)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kutjara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess BushCo never thought they'd ever have...
...to make cases against these people, so they didn't bother going to the trouble of fabricating plausible evidence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-14-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Absolutely shameful. How do they do it?
From the article:
One of the most visible errors became public in 2004, when three British detainees who had been accused of appearing in an Al Qaeda video in Afghanistan were released after the British government proved that they were in London at the time.

Defense lawyers say such errors are more widespread.
(snip)

In another case, military interrogators made significant translation mistakes when they first interrogated Mohamed el Gharani , one of Guantanamo's youngest detainees, according to his lawyer, Clive Stafford Smith .

Gharani, whose name the US military spells ``Qarani," was only 14 when he was arrested in Pakistan in October 2001. He was later interrogated using a translator from Yemen who spoke a different dialect of Arabic than was spoken in his native Saudi Arabia, according to Gharani's lawyer.

``The word `zalata' in Yemen means money, but in his Saudi Arabian dialect, it means tomato," said Smith. ``They asked him, `When you went to Pakistan, where did you get your zalata?' and he tells them all these different shops where you could buy tomatoes in Karachi. They write them all down, thinking that this 14-year-old kid is a big financier who was able to get money from all these different places."
(snip)
I'm sure they remembered to torture this kid, too. Christ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC