Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Europe Aims for Endless Energy (£6 Billion for Fusion)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 10:59 AM
Original message
Europe Aims for Endless Energy (£6 Billion for Fusion)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/renewable/Story/0,2763,1094164,00.html




Europe's scientists hope to mimic the power of
the sun and create limitless energy on Earth with
the help of a £6bn experiment in the south of
France.

Ministers in Brussels gave the go-ahead yesterday
for Iter, the world's biggest and most ambitious
fusion reactor, at Cadarache near
Aix-en-Provence. It will be 10 years in the making
and, in its 20-year operating life, researchers will
experiment with a kind of slow hydrogen bomb in
the hope of extracting vast amounts of clean
energy from tiny amounts of heavy water.

Iter will replace Jet, the current joint European
fusion research project, based at Culham,
Oxfordshire.

Sir Chris Llewellyn-Smith, head of the UK fusion
programme, said yesterday: "The Iter project will
allow a major step towards an inexhaustible
source of environmentally friendly power."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. The joke among physicists is that fusion is the energy of the future...
... and always will be. Fusion power is a great idea in principle, but the engineering problems to get to economic viability are vast and difficult. I hope this project helps to achieve the goal of a commercially viable fusion reactor, but I have my doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The joke among US citizens is a century of energy policy scams
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. The scientists I know don't think it's a joke
several have great hopes that cold fusion will be the discovery that saves our future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Did not mean to imply that it is not worth spending money on research
but if scientists are telling you that cold fusion is worth spending money on, they are badly misinformed. Cold fusion was disproved long ago and was a good example of how not to do science (science via press conference before being peer reviewed).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ernesto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
8. Do these "phyicists"
work for US oil corporations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Look
I (and I dare say most physicists) are in favor of fusion research. I have sent students on to graduate school to study plasma physics. All I am saying is that we have to be realistic about the prospects of success in the near term. Thirty years ago, people were saying it would take 30 years to come up with a viable fusion method. We are still saying it will take 30 years. In the mean time, we need to learn how to conserve energy in this country and to work on alternatives to the internal combustion engine (like hydrogen cars). Physicists should not oversell technology. Certain physicists in the fission power field predicted years ago that power from nuclear power plants would be too cheap to bother to meter. I don't think their predictions have been born out in the real world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. No, you look...
...if it was in the vested self-interest of the energy corporations to pursue the development of fusion, it would have been accomplished by now. Do you, or do you not, agree with that point of view?

You should know that the energy corporations are going to exhaust all remaining fossil fuels and extract every last cent before they move to any other energy sources. Just in case you've forgotten, that's the real reason why we have thousands of troops in the Middle East.

You should also know that the energy corporations were very creative in ensuring that the cost of energy produced by nuclear power plants was just as expensive as energy produced by other means. They weren't about to lose ANY profits for ANY reasons.

You should also know that the energy corporations will undoubtedly figure out a way to make fusion just as expensive, if not more so, than our current forms of energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Kind of silly, isn't it?


The US invades Iraq to partially secure it's future energy stakes at a cost of $100 of billions of dollars.

For the cost of a could weeks in Iraq we could be well on the way to producing practical fusion reactors and space elevators.

Bush has taken our future and spent it on Halliburton & friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Way more than $100 billion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozola Donating Member (992 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes, I know, but


you've got to START seriously funding these projects.

Current federal funding is a joke and has been for twenty years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Sorry, I misread your reply.
I thought you were saying Iraq only cost $100 Billlion, but rereading

it I noticed you pluralized billion(s)

I'd love to see hundreds of billions invested in alternative energies

It has to happen sooner or later and we need the jobs now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. That would be great
Right now the budget for basic research for the National Science Foundation (NSF) across all disciplines is about $5 B. The Department of Energy (DOE) basic energy sciences research budget is about $1 B.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vitruvius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. Total US Gov't funding for fusion , 1950 to present: less than $9 billion.
Edited on Thu Nov-27-03 03:47 PM by Vitruvius
But stealing Iraq's oil -- at an ultimate cost of several hundred billion -- is so much more important. NOT.

P.S: Also note that the $9 billion is roughly comparable with what the Europeans will spend on ITER in the next few years alone. And this does not include funding for other projects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well.....It is about time humanity looks for other resourses.
We all live on the same boat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
13. It should be pointed out that this project
is a real international collaboration (unlike the Iraq war) among many countries:

Although the Cadarache site has Brussels' backing, the decision has yet to be confirmed by the other partners in the project. These include Canada, the US, Russia, Japan, South Korea and China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Yes, they're all making sure that the project proceeds slowly enough...
...to exhaust all other forms of energy first.

You do realize that this group represents the largest producers (except OPEC) and consumers of fossil fuels, don't you?

You do realize that they all have vested interests in ensuring that certain fossil-fuel profit streams remain unbroken for as long as possible, don't you?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. thank you for that point. it clarified a lot for me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemExpat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. This is exciting news!
A little ray of light in all the darkness....

DemEx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC