Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pincus: Senate Opens Inquiry into Leaked Memos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
kskiska Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:41 PM
Original message
Pincus: Senate Opens Inquiry into Leaked Memos
Computer Files Discussed Democrats' Strategy on Bush Judicial Nominations
By Walter Pincus

(snip)

Frist spokeswoman Amy Call said the office was cooperating with the investigation but would have no further comment

Five committee Republicans have objected to Sergeant-at-Arms William Pickle allowing anyone to read their backup tapes without their consent. They also want the inquiry to be limited to examining the "memoranda in question and no other files."

Three days after the Wall Street Journal article appeared, Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), ranking Democrat on the Judiciary committee along with Kennedy and Durbin, requested that Pickle hire security experts to determine who retrieved the documents.

They also asked for an audit of logs to determine who may have been trying to access the files or directories from which the memos had been copied. Two days later, the senators complained to Hatch that he had not yet given consent for the committee hard drives to be turned over to Pickle.

(snip)

That same day, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.), a Judiciary committee member who asked Pickle to get his permission before accessing his computer files, took the Senate floor to discuss the memos.

After saying he awaited the outcome of the investigation to see how the memos were obtained, he said that now they have "entered into the public domain, and I think it is important that we address these memos and what, in fact, they confirm about the obstruction and destructive politics that have taken hold of the judicial confirmation process and which have left me concerned that there is no foreseeable end to the current gridlock."

more…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17502-2003Nov27.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
qanda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. All I can say is...
Bizarro World
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Right Johnny
You turn over all your work product, lay everything on the table and THEN we'll talk, you crook.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-03 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yah....bring it on SENATE!!!!
Let's see if your branch has any REAL power left
to prove a damn thing.

Ah....remember the Executive Branch has you putzes
wrapped around their little finger.

So go investigate and show how really friggin weak y'all are!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buycitgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-03 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. that's it? nothing more on this story?
Edited on Fri Nov-28-03 05:30 PM by buycitgo
how about the part where the IWF jumped the gun, releasing a summary of TWO YEARS' worth of memos (attributed to Frist's counsel, Manuel Miranda)? two YEARS!!! that was ten days ago, and I haven't heard any mention of that til today.

anyone else?

they then had to backtrack, because it brought into play Frist's mouthpiece, Miranda (formerly of the Sen. judiciary committee and PRIME candidate for accessing these memos==>my interp there), who, when questioned about his role in this fiasco, said that

1) he "can't comment" on investigations being conducted

and (2) that he "had not met with" any of Hatch's investigators.

so isn't it typical how they try to weasel and squirm, when their cockroach carapaces get caught in the spotlight.

add to this the distraught response of the Scaife-funded, laughably titled "Independent" Women's Forum, when they realized the hot water into which Miranda has been plunged:

they said in the press release that Miranda CIRCULATED THE ACTUAL MEMOS, then, recanting, said he only gave them the WSJ journal article which referenced said memos.

OK, which one of those statements is a big, hue, gigantic LIE?

and why has there been no discussion of this at all in the media, beyond the Post story? is the "in like a coward, out like a thief" Baghdad Airport Layover going to push this off the front page forever?

can't believe this is just going to die aborning.

oh, wait; can you say Valerie Plame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Democat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-03 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's see if the wimpy Dems actually make this into a real issue
Or will they give up on it after a week like they do with every other potential Republican scandal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-03 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. I find this part interesting:
"Five committee Republicans have objected to Sergeant-at-Arms William Pickle allowing anyone to read their backup tapes without their consent. They also want the inquiry to be limited to examining the "memoranda in question and no other files."


Gee, I wonder why. Could it be that there might be MORE "memoranda" found on some Republican computers, say something that might have something to do with the Senate Intelligence Committee and Rockefeller's office? Hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC