Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. denies signs of deadly November (Reuters)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-03 04:37 PM
Original message
U.S. denies signs of deadly November (Reuters)
<snip>

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - The top military commander in Iraq says attacks against U.S. forces have fallen sharply in recent weeks, despite
figures showing November to be the deadliest month for U.S. troops since the war began.

Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez said anti-American insurgents had struck fewer times in the past seven days than in the previous
week and put the reduction down to the more aggressive tactics used by U.S. forces. He also said the military was in the process of reshaping its forces in Iraq to rotate in more mobile units and ship out heavy armour such as tanks and Bradley fighting vehicles.

"In the past 14 days, we have seen the daily average of engagements throughout the country decline by over 30 percent," Sanchez told a
news conference in Baghdad. "And over the last seven-day period, we're down to an average of 22 engagements a day," he said, against as many as 50 a day just a couple of weeks ago. "This decline has been most significant where we have taken the fight to the enemy."

Despite the decline, however, figures from U.S. military officials show at least 72 U.S. soldiers died in action in November, according to a count by Reuters.

<snip>

Link: http://www.swisspolitics.org/en/news/index.php?section=int&page=news_inhalt&news_id=4501483

Wow, I didn't know they had classes in 'Spin' at West Point!!!

:wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-03 04:40 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only 72? Y'know, it coulda been a hunnert!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-03 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fewer attacks, maybe...
but much more deadly. IMO, this isn't a good thing. It means the resistance to the occupation is becoming more careful, organized and focused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-03 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. sure. you scare them, and they get more careful and attack with more
efficiency because they take more time to plan. makes sense.

we may learn some lessons about how to fight guerillas this time around, because we have to win this thing and we have to win it quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-03 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Dupe... locking
Please continue discussion within the original LBN thread on this topic, which can be found here:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=244830

WillyT, your link to the Reuters/SwissPolitics.org link would be helpful within the original thread.

Thanks!
VolcanoJen
DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-29-03 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. The recent counter-attacks by the U.S. have probably reduced
the number of attacks but all it means are that the guerillas are lying low and waiting for their opportunities.

I'm sure we'll see another spike in attacks soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC