Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Only 50 years left' for sea fish

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:29 PM
Original message
'Only 50 years left' for sea fish
There will be virtually nothing left to fish from the seas by the middle of the century if current trends continue, according to a major scientific study.

Stocks have collapsed in nearly one-third of sea fisheries, and the rate of decline is accelerating.

Writing in the journal Science, the international team of researchers says fisheries decline is closely tied to a broader loss of marine biodiversity.

But a greater use of protected areas could safeguard existing stocks.

"The way we use the oceans is that we hope and assume there will always be another species to exploit after we've completely gone through the last one," said research leader Boris Worm from Dalhousie University in Canada.

"What we're highlighting is there is a finite number of stocks; we have gone through one-third, and we are going to get through the rest," he told the BBC News website.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/6108414.stm

About 20 years ago I read "Sea of Slaughter" by Farley Mowhat. He went into great detail about the overfishing and collapse of fish stocks and marine mammals. Tragic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hate my species
I just can't say it enough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Yes we need to outlaw birth control
More children for all

Maybe they will eat each other in 200 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #21
77. Soilent Green. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #77
93. Soylent green is people!!
IT'S PEOPLE!!!! :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. The human race grossly overrates it's intelligence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #26
47. Ain't that the fuckin' truth!
Holy shit, the pride we take in our "superior intelligence" as we trash the world that supports us. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #26
82. Great Pun!
Unless you didn't mean to slip in that extraneous apostrophe into "it's".

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. I agree. We're destroying our world
because we're individually too greedy to act collectively for the greater good. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #29
73. Exactly
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 09:15 AM by shadowknows69
in a sane intelligent world such news would cause the immediate cessation of all commercial fishing. If the fish are all dead in fifty years then we are all gone probably about 20 later and that's being generous. The food chain will collapse when a link is completely removed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
89. Me too! Mankind will destroy Mankind!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
95. It's only forty years. The report says collapse will be by 2048.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. But, but, we need more omega-3!!!
If everyone in China decides to eat seafood everyday, we're done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hashibabba Donating Member (894 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. We shouldn't eat too much seafood anyway (although
a bit of it is good for you), its loaded with things like mercury!! I love fish, but rely more on my fish oil caps every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Astrad Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Ummm...where do you think that fish oil comes from? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. I don't do the fishoil. Instead, I do flaxseed. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
populistdriven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
43. flaxseed oil is great for popcorn - try it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
37. LOL... maybe they harvest the oil without killing the fish....?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. They'll just start doing more Fish Farming
and we'll be stuck with Fish that has added homones and colorings blech!:puke:

And since the Fish-Farmers grind up other Fish and press into pellets and feed the farmed Fish
those pellets maybe a new Mad Fish Disease will develope! :sarcasm:
So all the way around we're fucked by our own species. :hurts:

Looking grim.........

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. mad fish disease
I think I saw that movie on SciFi

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #28
71. Those salmon farm freaks are vacuuming up all the krill they can find....
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 12:15 AM by pinniped
to feed their stupid farmed crap salmon. I guess they're getting tired of placing those "Color Added" labels on the packages.

There goes the main food source for the whales and many other species of marine life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markam Donating Member (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
92. I bet you didn't know
that the good old omega-3 oil mostly comes from Omega Protein

http://www.omegaproteininc.com/

Omega protein is an operating unit for Zapata Corporation

http://www.zapatacorp.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=118763&p=irol-irhome

Zapata just happens to be Zapata Petroleum Corporation, founded by George H.W. Bush.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zapata_Corporation#Omega_Protein_Corporation.2C_subsidiary

Buy fish oil pills and you are contributing the the destruction of the ocean, and as an added bonus, supporting the Bush family. You couldn't ask for a better twofor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. the earth will purge itself of humans if it is smart and it is nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arewenotdemo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
70. and viruses may just turn out to be the Earth's guardians
in that sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkcc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. This doesn't really come as a surprise.
I'm only in my early 30s, but I can remember that when I was a child, there wasn't nearly such a big selection of food products at the grocery store. As our society's tastes have grown more and more diverse, so has our demand for new, exotic foods.

Years ago, the fish counter in our local grocery store (in upstate NY) had a handful of different local fish from which to choose. Now, you can get just about anything you can imagine, no matter where you live. That has to be putting a strain on the ecosystem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Which came first
"As our society's tastes have grown more and more diverse"

"Now, you can get just about anything you can imagine, no matter where you live."

the chicken or the egg?

I don't think our tastes have done anything. It's all about availability. We(mass society) simply want to consume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkcc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. I both agree and disagree.
30 years ago, there wasn't a huge demand for something like sushi. Then, it started catching on in big U.S. cities, then slowly made its way into the suburbs. Suddenly, restaurants and grocers had to cater to everyone who wanted the stuff.

And look at something like Angus beef. Years ago, that was a delicacy that you would only get in very good steakhouses. Now, you can get burgers made from the stuff at chain restaurants.

So yes, we want to consume, but I think that marketers tell the masses what they should consume and the consumers follow suit.

Chicken or the egg, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. How about some Wolf Fish?
As Farley Mowhat explains, as well as in the above article, we move on to the next species after the present species population collapses. Mowhat explains the phenomenonon of the Wolf Fish showing up in fish markets, but often with a more palatable name. Ocean catfish sounds much nicer, don't you think?

What was once considered a trash species, e.g., the huge codfish of the North Atlantic a few hundred years ago, became highly sought after, when the more highly esteemed species (e.g. Halibut) had declined. Eventually, there are no more left.


Wolffish

a.k.a.: Ocean catfish, seacat

Waters:Northern Atlantic and Pacific Oceans



Description (in water): Most of these long, gray-blue or greenish fish weigh under ten pounds, but 30- and 40-lb. specimens have been caught. This is a ferocious-looking fish with long, sharp front teeth and a set of back teeth that's built for crushing tough-shelled prey like clams, crabs, and sea urchins.

Description (in market): The lean, pearly white flesh has a firm texture and a mild, sweet flavor. The s kin is edible.

Sold as: Whole, fillets

Best cooking: Wolffish is perhaps best cooked whole, lightly flour-dredged and sautéed. It can also be broiled, roasted, or grilled (use a grill basket). Fillets are delicious pan-fried.

Buying tips: Look for unmarred skin and red, alive-looking gills on whole fish. Fillets should be white and moist, with no browning, graying, or gaping. The fish should smell of seawater.

Substitutes: Blackfish, cod, dogfish, flatfish, ocean perch, pollock, red snapper, turbot


http://www.gortons.com/cookbook/gl_we_wo.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katzenjammer Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #19
63. Seeing wolffish in a sea aquarium was a scary experience
Those huge, snaggly teeth were more frightening, somehow, than the sharks' even, neat rows. And shark teeth are much sharper, too. But these fish look like they mugged dragons for their dentures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #63
64. They're a reef fish. We should just let them be.
When we decimate the ocean fish that travel in large schools, we go after even reef fish that live in the depths (100m - 300m).


Identification:

Breeding:
Wintertime, laying large clumps of eggs amongst stones and seaweed on sea floor.

Habitat:
Offshore, usually at depths of 100 to 300m over rocky substrates

Food:
Mainly shellfish such as crabs, molluscs and echinoderms

Range:
A North Atlantic species found from British Isles in the east to the coast of Maine in the west.

Additional Notes:
commercially fished for in Norway

The head is large and square with a large toothsome mouth, and eyes that are set well forward. The body is laterally compressed and tapers to the small fan-like tail. The dorsal is long, stretching from the head to the caudal peduncle, and the anal fin stretches from the anus to the caudal peduncle. Pectoral fins are large and the pelvic fins are absent. Its back is a blue/grey colour with numerous broad stripes.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Katzenjammer Donating Member (541 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. I agree, we should let them alone. Even though I found them scary to look at,
I also felt a kind of connection because they came right up to the glass and looked out at me. They were off at the other side of the tank until I walked up to look in, and then 2 or 3 of them came over, bumped against the glass, and hovered there looking out at me. That's something that I'd never seen fish do before, and it felt a little charming somehow. Later I figured out that it was probably only that I represented a possible lunch, but at the time it felt more benign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. And with it going to the world market, how many millions of tons
of these imported fish, veggies, meats etc. wind up getting thrown out, unused, because of expiration dates, or because shipping tie-ups cause it to rot on the docks? How much actually makes it to our plates, but because of super-sizing our portions, a third is left uneaten?

We are destroying our world for our gluttony.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkcc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Amen.
Exactly my point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is a problem of affluence
The first thing you want when you have any wealth is some protein in your diet then a TV. The world poverty rate is declining as population goes up so more need for protein from the sea.

Americans eat a lot of fish and seafood but other peoples on earth eat a lot more. I think the only way out of this is tissue cultures (if they can find a way to get the proper ratio of fat to muscle).

Or soylent green.

There are very good metrics on the deteriorating fish stock - for example fish size is reducing. I think many things in the environmental movement is nonsense but this is not one of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. Or farm fishing
And it doesn't have to be a nightmare to the environment to work
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. There are problems with farm fishing
Much of the feed consists of junk fish caught alongside other fish in the wild (I think -- I am by no means an expert on these matters). Again if we could culture tissue then give it to farmed fish then this is one way technology may help us out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taverner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
41. Yes there are a number of problems with farm fishing however...
It beats the alternative...and there are operations which do a sustainable, enviro-friendly practice.

Seaweed and sea kelp are often used as feed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. It is a problem of WORLD OVERPOPULATION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theHandpuppet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
62. THANK YOU!
That's the bottom line, simply stated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. good.
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 02:46 PM by Teaser
Fish just take up valuable water anyway.

They are our most ancient enemy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
8. A natural or man-made '535 A.D. event' will straighten out.........
the overpopulation problem so that the earth can heal itself. Man and humankind's obscene and uncontrollable greed will be its own demise before the end of THIS century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. What happened in 535 A.D.?
I think the Western Roman Empire was already disbanded by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Here you go.........
535 AD - Volcano Krakatoa Explodes - The Dark Ages Start - Science is put on hold.:

http://www.hbci.com/~wenonah/history/535ad.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. Did you watch PBS special? The second part aired this week. Fascinating.
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 04:09 PM by glitch
Oh, I guess you did. Just clicked your link to the PBS special. Good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Great PBS special, I really enjoyed the history, science and economics.........
ONLY a matter of time till a similar event occurs and 'WE' won't be prepared for IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Realityhack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
46. The thing that they left unsaid was...
that while the problems after 535 where caused by a volcano any global crisis/environmental change could cause similar long term impact. It could just as well be man made. Depletion of a global food source (fish for example), running short on oil, global climate change due to man, volcano, astroid, etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #46
76. I agree. Said similar in my post #8 of this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
68. There was also a major epidemic in Europe that decade.
The Plauge of Justinian. It is hypothesized that one of the reasons the Saxons overan the Celtic Britons so easily was that the plauge depopulated large parts of the British countryside
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #22
69.  Interesting....
535 AD

* The nobles were returning from the middle east "HOLY WARS".
* Pope John II died.
* There were days of darkness.
* The plague swept around the world three times in about ten years.
* There were seven years of crop failures.
* Nations changed their religions.
* Empires Fell.
* In places great drought destroyed the land.
* In other places floods brought chaos.
* Tree rings didn't show normal growth for fifteen years.

Imagine if Toba blows - it would make Krakatoa look like Mt. St. Helens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. "I know the human being and fish can coexist peacefully." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. possibly THE most crucial environmental news . . . kicked/recommended . . . n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. oops -- this is going to hurt
"peak oil" ain't got nothing on this calamity. When the fish go, that's the End Of The Line for the biosphere as you knew it, folks.

It's time to start asking, "What is life going to be like on the backside of the Hubbert curve?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. Why do those fish hate America so much?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
18. Let's hope we get more participation among citizens...
to elect more responsible governors.

Otherwise, it's carte blanche for commercial fishing operations. You know how that'll go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
civildisoBDence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
24. Dr. Seuss was a visiony...
"One fish two fish, red fish blue fish."

That'll be it.

Newsprism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
30. Not to worry. The Lord moves in mysterious ways.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
32. Support Zero Population Growth
There are too many people on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:18 PM
Response to Reply #32
35. We have an unsustainable population
at least in view of our present consumption habits. There is no need to have more than six billion people. We've been fruitful and have multiplied enough already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Red Donating Member (52 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #32
94. That's a good place to start,
but we are going to have to start discussing Negative Population Growth (NPG) soon...if Mother Nature doesn't do it for us. All of our major global problems are a direct result of an unsustainable human population. That's the real elephant in the room! Ironically, the last American president to bring up the issue was...(wait for it)...RICHARD NIXON.:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
36. a handy list to take to restaurants ...
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 04:20 PM by Lisa
A Canadian environmental group has compiled information on which species of seafood are under the most threat, or associated with serious impacts (e.g. unsustainable fish-farming). They have cards you can print out from their website, which can be distributed as a guide (and also used to lobby restaurants to take certain items off the menu, to reduce the pressure on stocks).

http://www.seachoice.org/page/news


Particularly vulnerable species (should be avoided)
http://www.seachoice.org/profile/result?rating=3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:22 AM
Response to Reply #36
72. And one from the Monterey Bay Aquarium:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. A new study shows that animal muscle power largely drives ocean convection
Marine Life Stirs Ocean Enough To Affect Climate, Study Says
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/10/061013202025.htm

Kill the fish, and the thermohaline circulation system will slow or fail. And global climate will go haywire.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. wow! neat study!
So there is some truth to that "butterfly flapping its wings" analogy (only this is underwater of course). Thanks for posting! (Forwarding it to my boss, who studies climate change but started out in ecological energetics.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #38
48. Amazing!
I would not have guessed that this effect was so significant.

We should respect biodiversity, not because without it we may be facing extinction ourselves, but because we don't have the right to destroy nature. We are part of nature, just another animal, but the most dangerous one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
file83 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #38
78. That deserves its own post! That is amazing, and scary....
...because if ocean life begins to die off...what does that do to our climate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'm doing my part
I haven't eaten any seafood that wasn't shrimp for decades, since my mother last forced it on me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
40. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YankeyMCC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
44. "Requires a fundamental change..."
The most important statement in this piece. Continual expansion is no longer a viable source of benefit to humanity. We need to move on from our childhood into at least the first stage of maturity and actually manage our environment not just exploit it.

And if you just look to our political leaders there is just no way that's going to happen. It has to be a grass roots change in how everyone acts and thinks about the world (the Single, Finite World) in which we live.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
49. Ocean study predicts the collapse of all seafood fisheries by 2050
original-Stanford Report

Stanford Report, November 2, 2006
Ocean study predicts the collapse of all seafood fisheries by 2050

All species of wild seafood will collapse within 50 years, according to a new study by an international team of ecologists and economists. Writing in the Nov. 3 issue of the journal Science, the researchers conclude that the loss of marine biodiversity worldwide is profoundly reducing the ocean's ability to produce seafood, resist diseases, filter pollutants and rebound from stresses, such as climate change and overfishing.

"Unless we fundamentally change the way we manage all the ocean species together as working ecosystems, then this century is the last century of wild seafood," said study co-author Stephen Palumbi, professor of biological sciences at Stanford's Hopkins Marine Station.

Palumbi and Stanford colleague Fiorenza Micheli, assistant professor of biological sciences at Hopkins, are two of 14 co-authors of the Science study, the first major analysis of all existing datasets—historical, experimental, fisheries and observational—on ocean species and ecosystems.

Based on current global trends, the authors predicted that every species of wild-caught seafood—from tuna to sardines—will collapse by the year 2050. "Collapse" was defined as a 90 percent depletion of the species' baseline abundance.

"Whether we looked at tidepools or studies over the entire world's ocean, we saw the same picture emerging," said lead author Boris Worm of Dalhousie University. "In losing species we lose the productivity and stability of entire ecosystems. I was shocked and disturbed by how consistent these trends are—beyond anything we suspected."

The impacts of species loss go beyond declines in seafood, the authors said, noting that human health risks also emerge as depleted coastal ecosystems become vulnerable to invasive species, disease outbreaks and noxious algal blooms.
~snip~
.
.
.
complete articlehere
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. I think it's time for me to become a vegetarian.......
Maybe occasional farmed salmon or catfish or shimp (they farm shrimp, right?). But it's time to say goodbye to wild-caught fish.

:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. Just one more reason I am glad...
I am a vegetarian -- I don't contribute to this terrible problem. :cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brokensymmetry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
52. I suspect the study is overly optimistic.
As growing population, climate change, and higher
energy costs strike land crops, people will turn
to the sea. Mankind will grab every minnow in
the oceans. Forget collapse - think mass extinction.

A few days ago, I posted a restaurant menu over in
the lounge - a pretty fancy restaurant a friend
works at. One of the items was a fish. It used to
be a so-called trash fish - one that fishers would
just dump on the shore. Now, it's featured.

I can remember less than 50 years ago when you'd
see Icelandic cod, haddock, and halibut in TV dinners.
The portions were large, the quality high - in a TV
dinner! Try getting such fare at a restaurant!

It's sad. The youth of today will inherit a burned-out
husk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiviaOlivia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #49
53. Seafood Population Depleted by 2048, Study Finds
Seafood Population Depleted by 2048, Study Finds

By Juliet Eilperin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, November 2, 2006; 2:28 PM

The world will run out of seafood by 2048 if steep declines in marine species continue at current rates, according to a study released today by an international group of ecologists and economists.

The paper, published in the journal Science, concludes that overfishing, pollution, and other environmental factors are wiping out important species across the globe, hampering the ocean's ability to produce seafood, filter nutrients and resist the spread of disease.

"We really see the end of the line now," said lead author Boris Worm, a marine biologist at Canada's Dalhousie University. "It's within our lifetime. Our children will see a world without seafood if we don't change things."

The 14 researchers from Canada, Panama, Sweden and the United States spent four years analyzing all the available data on fish populations and ocean ecosystems to reach their conclusion. They found that by 2003 -- the last year for which data on global commercial fish catches is available -- 29 percent of all fished species had collapsed, and that the rate of population collapses has accelerated in recent years.

~snip~

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/02/AR2006110200913.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #53
54. This has a thread right down the page
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #53
55. I love how the synonym for 'marine life' the author uses is SEAFOOD
as though the only purpose of life in the seas were to make fishsticks for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. My thought exactly. "World without seafood" sounds less horrifying than...
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 04:58 PM by Barrett808
..."world without marine life."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Life adapts
when you selectively deplete the ocean of edible species, what remains, necessarily, will not be seafood.

Good for them, not so good for us, perhaps best for all, overall...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #56
61. On the other hand,
in the case of morans of the world who really couldn't care less about species extinction, referring to sea life as "seafood" might have an impact on their limited sensibilities.

No more lobster dinners. No more clam chowder or crab feasts. No more Uncle Fred's Seafood restaurant. No more Mrs Pauls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. Referring to it as "sea life"
Edited on Thu Nov-02-06 04:53 PM by meganmonkey
instead of "seafood" would probably be a good start...

:shrug:

on edit: i am clearly not the first or only person to notice that :dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. So....Who Cares......As King george Would Say...We'll Be Dead By Then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #58
65. Or "Raptured" by then.
LOL yeah right. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #53
60. But doctor-murdering Ben Stein says, "Grab a fork, there's a lot more out there."
Why shouldn't we listen to Ben Stain... I mean Stein?

Anyone?

Anyone?

Slepian?

Slepian?


See:

Wild Alaska Seafood, ‘Wild Ben’ Stein and The Food Network Cast a Wide Net with High Impact Ad Campaign”
The Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute Takes Sustainability Message to the Airwaves

Seattle, Washington, September 25, 2006 – The Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute (ASMI) will launch a consumer television advertising campaign on The Food Network beginning September 25, 2006. The campaign is designed to promote wild and abundant Alaska seafood and prompt consumers to “Ask for Alaska” the next time they visit their favorite restaurants and grocery stores. ASMI is reaching out to foodservice and retail customers like never before; and has contracted with television/movie actor and comedian, Ben Stein, to deliver its sustainable message and promote the benefits of wild Alaska seafood. To view these spots please go to www.alaskaseafood.org/tv_ad <http://www.alaskaseafood.org/tv_ad> .

ASMI has a long history of providing its foodservice and retail customers with strong merchandising programs to drive sales of wild Alaska seafood. These efforts have been and will continue to be strengthened through highly compelling consumer print advertising campaigns. Now ASMI casts an even wider net by fortifying these efforts with this series of commercial spots airing on The Food Network. These spots are designed to inform, educate and entertain…and “Wild Ben’s” deadpan humor entertains with just the right amount levity when he reminds us to, “Grab a fork, there’s a lot more out there.”

In an effort to keep messages consistent across all consumer, foodservice and retail markets, ASMI has created 30- and 15-second versions of three spots: All-Species, Salmon and Crab. These spots will air from September 25 through November 27, 2006 and will coincide with the fall and winter/holiday season. The media buy has been finely targeted and coverage includes prime time, prime access, daytime, early fringe and weekends.

<snip>

“Grab a Fork” crab posters are also available to foodservice establishments and retail seafood counters for the upcoming holiday crab season.

More:
http://foodservice.chef2chef.net/foodservice-news/read_new1785.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judaspriestess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-02-06 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
66. why do humans hate planet earth?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #66
75. We have a species-wide death wish. I wish I were joking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
74. And the media is obsessing over botched jokes and who's in the closet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
79. As a long time
offshore Tuna fisherperson, I think its even worse than what we are being told. Last year-no fish for 200 nm's offshore, this year we had fish but still further offshore than usual. Taking into account the "dead zones" off our coast (Oregon), looks like I will put the boat on the hard and call it a day soon.
The Mother Ocean is not well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ozone_man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #79
81. It's good to hear from a fisherman.
So am I, but of the very casual variety. Welcome to DU!

There have been fisheries that have rebounded and are now thriving, such as the lobster and striped bass fishing in the North East, but we need to take action before it's too late. There is a way for sustainable harvesting of fish. But it requires careful monitoring and limits. These ocean draggers take everything of the sea floor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
here_is_to_hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #81
83. Thanks!
Long time (4 years) lurker, the coming regime change finally got me to register...:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough already Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
80. Too many people on the planet
That will be taken care of when we run out of food.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
humbled_opinion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
84. Damn I love Alaskan King Crab... Its already so expensive...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sapper Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
85. And you really believe this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #85
86. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #85
87. Those silly scientists.
Don't they know that God would never allow one of his creatures to become extinct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 07:25 PM
Response to Reply #87
98. Yes- with their elitist "tests", "experiments" and "facts"-who do they think they are??
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #85
97. As opposed Rush, Fox news and anti-science Haggard types?
I'll go with the scientists as opposed to proven liars & meth heads on this one, thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Felix Mala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
88. "Homey, are you going to eat that and be responsible for extinguishing an entire species?"
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 03:53 PM by Feles Mala
"But Marge.... they're so tasty and grrr---rlph--chomp chomp, brrrrrp... mmm...mmm extinct species..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ItNerd4life Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
90. Another scare tactic?
According to scientists from 30 years ago:
We are supposed to be entering an ice age.
We are supposed to be so over populated that everybody will be starving.
We are supposed to have so much pollution that nothing could survive.

Yet, we have global warming, less pollution, and we have an increasing population (which means there's food somewhere).

This country's food production has nearly doubled in the last 30 years because of improved farming methods. Maybe the same thing will occur with seafood.

Don't get me wrong, I think we need to take better care of the environment. But I think these scare tactics are starting to sound like Republicans tactics when it comes to terrorism alerts.

I think I better start eating more fish so I get my fair share! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Peer-reviewed scienctific papers are scare tactics?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-03-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #90
96. The warnings from 30 years ago were heeded to an extent.
Edited on Fri Nov-03-06 07:19 PM by Dr Fate
Predictions are meant to be warnings- not fate engraved in stone.

Scientists warned us that *if* we did not adjust some things, then the disaters you listed might happen.

Just imagine what would have happened had we never been warned and had Liberals not fought to have those warnings heeded to an extent.

BTW- rapid global climate change is still a fact, one way or the other.

I think your approach is bass-ackwards.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC