Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Sip Of Beer In N.Y. Now Worthy Of Intoxication

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
ECH1969 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:20 PM
Original message
A Sip Of Beer In N.Y. Now Worthy Of Intoxication
Drinking a shot of beer in New York could get you arrested for drunken driving. At least that's the way the state law reads.

Lawmakers this year approved a bill that sets the standard for driving while intoxicated at 0.18 grams of alcohol in a person's blood.

A person's body might produce that much alcohol naturally, said Ed Fiandach, a DWI lawyer in Rochester.

Gov. George Pataki signed the bill into law in September. Fiandach said he was told by Pataki's office the governor was aware of the error but figured the Legislature would correct it with an amendment.

http://wcbstv.com/topstories/local_story_310155149.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. .18 grams? That's ridiculous...should be .18% I'd think.
Sounds like a typo error in the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susanna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. I think Michigan went to the .08 standard...
I wonder if that's what they were going for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Its not only ridiculous, it's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't disagree with this
If you're driving, don't drink. Not even one drop. That's the safest way, for you, and everybody else. No calculations of hours, to drinks, to body mass, or all the other rationalizing stupidity people get into: Driving? No drink, period. End of story. I'm down with that. Good.

And I am a drinker. Love it, even. Love beer.
And I smoke.

And I do not, under any circumstances, drink and drive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well, if you drink on Saturday night and drive on Monday
YOU could have .18 grams of alcohol in your blood stream. THINK ABOUT THAT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Or if you drank some orange juice
Most fruit juice and lots of other things have up to about 0.5% alcohol content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NOLADEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. You should disagree with this
It results in people who have not been drinking going to jail, hiring a lawyer, losing their license, paying restitution and court costs, and paying higher insurance ALL because the threshold set by some moron is BELOW WHAT YOUR BODY PRODUCES NATURALLY.

HOW could you agree with this? You want people getting arrested for DWI because they are producing alcohol naturally?

Just because an alcohol impairment threshold is a good idea doesn't automatically mean that a lower threshold is a better, safer idea. In fact, it creates more victims than it prevents.

Let's arrest anyone with a child in their lap because it COULD mean his intent is to molest.
Let's arrest anyone with a durable good in their possession because it COULD be stolen.

Jeez. Lighten up. Draconian laws are ALWAYS more trouble than they prevent. People who drink and drive will do so regardless of the law. Creating a stronger law doesn't prevent that, it only ensnares people who, like all people, produce alcohol in their bloodstream naturally.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I disagree with it.
Every adult should be consuming a glass of alcohol per day.

0.18 grams? That's less than mouthwash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lurking Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hell a diabetic
could register that at any given moment, depending on their blood glucose. So could people on the Atkins diet who are producing ketones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. It was a typo in the law according to the story
They meant to say 0.18% blood alcohol, a limit at which prosecutors could not reduce a dwi to a lesser charge of driving while impaired. BTW, 0.18% is a pretty hefty reading, more than double the .08% limit in most states, and anyone reaching that number would be obviously intoxicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Bloode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Yeah to be honest if it's .18% thats a pretty good buzz.
Edited on Mon Nov-06-06 06:03 PM by William Bloode
Closest i ever came to a dwi i blew .10, then .09. I was pretty buzzin' at that level. I lucked out because you have to blow twice, and they take the lowest. Our limit at the time was .10, since lowered to .08. the cop was soooo mad it was unreal. he actually grabbed my collar and tried to make me blow again lol!

People i have seen who blow .20 or so were very drunk, and i thought like .25 or so was near critical? Has to be lower than .18 , thats pretty fried.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Your experiences regarding breath analysis are formidable.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
William Bloode Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Come a little closer when you say that.
:rofl:

:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jersey Devil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Highest I ever saw was a .41
The guy was found unconscious with the front end of his car up a tree in someone's back yard. By all rights he should have been dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringrepublican Donating Member (779 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
18. I have a friend who was still conscious at that level!
she was in the hospital. The entire staff was just shocked that she was talking. Her mom did say that they staff kept telling her to breathe. She was 16-years-old and 115lbs at the time!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
11. Don't eat at a French Restaurant
They use a lot of wine in their cooking. Coq au Vin? Forget it.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrPrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-06-06 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
12. Eat a Rumball...go to jail? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
17. So even knowing the figures are wrong, Pataki signs the bill anyway
Edited on Tue Nov-07-06 12:07 AM by Art_from_Ark
If the figures are wrong, send the bill back to the legislature for revision before signing it. What's so hard about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. That would require gonads, of which Pataki is distinctly lacking
Apparently.

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Election year ploy...
Normally I would suspect this would be the sort of think a repuke would do, but I've become so accustomed to looking at normal mistakes as political gamesmanship over the last few months, that the first thought that came to mind was that this was done intentionally. Send Pataki a bill that is intentionally wrong and ridiculous, make him veto it or at least return it, and then run an ad about how the repukes are soft on drunk driving. Reading the article, I don't think that's the case, but I have to admit that's the first thing I thought of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mizmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
21. In my NY county they seize DWI's cars
they hold the car until the trial and if found guilty they keep it and sell it. They county keeps the money. BTW, the county has a $26 million deficit.

I know it was a typo but this could be a very profitable windfall for my county. I don't like DWIs, but I like theiving county officials even less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-07-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
22. just using an asthma inhaler could put you in jail...
... under this standard.

The new ozone-friendly pMDIs use a new class of propellants called hydrofuoroalkanes (HFA). HFA albuterol (aka salbutamol) inhalers are typically formulated with a certain amount of ethanol. Even the old-fashioned CFC-propelled epinephrine inhalers that you can buy over the counter contain alcohol; in fact, at almost 35% ethanol by weight, good old Primatene Mist is 70 proof!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC