Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Feingold closer to decision on presidential run

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 09:54 AM
Original message
Feingold closer to decision on presidential run

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15635494/from/RS.3/

Feingold closer to decision on presidential run
Wis. Democratic senator expects to decide by end of year

WASHINGTON - Sen. Russ Feingold said he's closer to making a decision on a presidential race following this week's congressional elections, but still hasn't decided if the election results have made him more or less likely to run for president.

"It pushes me in both directions, and I'm going to sit down and think about exactly what I want to be doing over the next couple of years," Feingold, D-Wis., said in a telephone interview late Tuesday night, when Democrats took control of the House and made a run for Senate control.

Feingold, who was the first senator to call for a timetable to bring troops back from Iraq, said he was buoyed by the message voters sent on the war. Almost six in 10 voters disapproved of the war in Iraq, and a majority said the U.S. should withdraw some or all of its troops from Iraq, exit polls showed.

"So it gives me the sense that what I've been talking about on this would resonate with the voters of this country, if I decided to run for president," he said.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Wickerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. pretty crowded field
Vilaseck, Obama (if you believe the hype and MSM), Feingold - all recent additions to a field that was already crowded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. I love Feingold to pieces.
BUT (and it's a big one) I doubt he could win a national election - through no fault of his own, mind you - but through the fault of the media in the South and mid-West.

We simply don't have large or many alternative souces of media in the 'red' or 'purple' states (which is why we're those colors to begin with).

I witnessed this, personally, during this lat Senatorial election: Tennessee had the PERFECT candidate in Harold Ford Jr. He was a moderate-to-conservative Democrat. While he was DLC on some issues, he wasn't overly corportist and had plans for education, getting out of Iraq, for universal health care and for other issues that would appeal to Tennesseans. I know much has been made about race on this board regaring the Tennessee decision to go with the rubber-stamping no-idea-having Republican, Bob Corker, but that REALLY had little to do with it.

What it did have to do with was our lack of good media vetting. And, I fear, because Feingold is both a Democrat and a Jewish person, to boot, he will NOT have a fair shake in the Southern and mid-Western media.

My Jewish husband agrees with me tri-fold.

Is America ready for a Jewish or black or female president - SURE! Will it vote for one - probably not.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LilyLibber Donating Member (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. And that's a goddamn crying shame...
...because I firmly believe Feingold would be exactly the kind of President this country needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Feingold Is Too Good To Be President
You're exactly right in your observations. Feingold unfortunately would not have much of a chance in a national election.

It's more pathetic that one of the reasons he has no chance is the fact he's jewish. And you're right, Obama would lose for a similar reason, because he's black.

I suppose we'll see if America can vote for a woman, if Hillary runs, but a black or a jew would be obviously "handicapped."

I also doubt the Democratic party would get behind Feingold enough to carry him past the primaries. My guess is he wouldn't make it past the first couple of cuts in early 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadAsHell Donating Member (571 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. I am not sure I can disagree with you but ...
I do have to observe that Senator Feingold has made no secret of his religious background and he wins in a big way here in Wisconsin. You know, Wisconsin, where we have both kinds of churches ... Catholic and Lutheran ... :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Oooh, the electability meme already.
Damn, that was fast. Kerry was "electable" too as I'm sure Hillary, Biden, Vilsak, Warner, Kerry II, & Obama will all be "electable."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. I personally think that Harold Ford, Jr.
sucked ASS as a candidate.

I would vote for Feingold in a HEARTBEAT.
He has NONE of the drawbacks that beset Ford.
In fact, he is the ANTI-FORD!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlienGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. People thought a Catholic couldn't win, then along came JFK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
4. I would like to see a Feingold/Obama or
Obam/Feingold ticket, but we will see how things sort themselves out. There is time.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Feingold/Richardson ?
Edited on Thu Nov-09-06 05:16 PM by pokercat999
On edit. I just realized it could never happen....names won't fit on a bumper sticker.........:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sebastianj333 Donating Member (67 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
6. Feingold is the best choice
I mean it, especially if he gets a running mate from the south or midwest maybe...
He is a stand up guy....i wonder why the media never mentions his name?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. I would like him to run if he does not give up his seat to take the shot. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dragonlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. He was reelected in 2004
so he wouldn't have to choose between Senate and president. However, he might become a little pressed for time to cover his yearly listening sessions in each Wisconsin county (there are quite a few).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. Then I would like him to run. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. He'd make a great president.
He is one hell of a senator. But I think we need him there to talk some sense into the other senators.

Before the tsunami, I was hoping he'd be our nominee, so that somebody in power would defend or restore our rights. Now I think that his voice will be heard in the Senate, so it's not so critical that he be the president. But he would be a good one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
14. Feingold + John Warner WINNING TEAM
I sure wish Mr. Warner could run. Potential 16 years of prosperity with these two, IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
15. Go, baby, go!
Feingold/Waxman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Whoooo Hoooo!!! Go get em Feingold!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntiRaymi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'd definitely vote for him. n.t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Placebo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-09-06 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
20. I like him, BUT...
he just doesn't "feel" like a president to me. He should stay a senator and become one of the greats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignacio Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-10-06 02:27 AM
Response to Original message
22. I hope he stays a Senator
We only have a bare majority at this point, and I would rather have a candidate who doesn't get unfairly attacked by his opponent for "missing" votes. Also, the fact that he is a twice-divorced, secular-liberal Jew is not going to help his chances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkmoonIkonoklast Donating Member (829 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
23. If he's the nominee, he's got my vote...
   ... after all, the 'pugs might not be running "*", but the Pachys will STILL be running one of the Amerikkan Hezbollah, so I'll be voting "Anybody But {fill in the blank}"!
   But what a wonder if Feingold turned out to be that rarest of all characters -- rarer than unicorns, rarer than beautiful women unafraid to break out of the dumb-closet (there's lots of you here, afer all!), rarer even than men unafraid of women smarter than we are -- a candidate I can actually vote FOR?
   I mean, I've been voting AGAINST since 1980! Once in my life, I'd like to be able to vote FOR someone!!!
   And PLEASE don't try to sell me on Hillary... if she's the nominee, she's got my vote, but it'd be just another "AB{_}" vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:04 AM
Response to Original message
24. He announced last Sunday that he is not runnng for President
Dear Friends and Supporters,

On Sunday, November 12th in Racine, I will hold my 1000th Listening Session with the people of Wisconsin. Before reaching that milestone, I want you to know that I've decided to continue my role as Wisconsin's Junior Senator in the U.S. Senate and not to seek the Democratic nomination for President in 2008.

Like many Americans, I am excited by the results of the November 7th election. My fourteen years in the Senate have been the greatest privilege of my life and I am extremely pleased with what we have accomplished. During so much of that time, however, we Democrats have not only been in the minority but have often been so deeply mired there that my role has often been to block bad ideas or to simply dissent. That is a very important role but I relish the thought that in this new Congress we can start, not only to undo much of the damage that one-party rule has done to America, we can actually advance progressive solutions to such major issues as guaranteed healthcare, dependence on oil, and our unbalanced trade policies. The Senate of the 110th Congress could also well be a place of greater bi-partisan opportunities for change; something I am very proud to have been effective at in both Republican and Democratic Senates.

I hope all of you know how much I have appreciated the incredible response you have given me and the efforts of our Progressive Patriots Fund since January, 2005. In addition to all of our work in Wisconsin and D.C., I have traveled to seventeen states trying to promote the election of progressive Democrats in all states. At every stop from Birmingham, Alabama to Burlington, Vermont, to Ft. Dodge, Iowa, to Las Vegas, Nevada, people have agreed with my view that we need to stand up for a strong, principled Democratic party that is willing to replace timidity with taking the risks of promoting a platform of bold solutions to our nation's problems. Unfailingly, people responded well to my positions: opposition to the Iraq war; calling for a timeline to redeploy our troops from Iraq so we can focus on those who attacked us on September 11th, 2001; my opposition to the flawed provisions of the USA Patriot Act that threaten the freedoms of law-abiding Americans; my call for accountability for the Administration's arrogant disregard for the law especially with regard to illegal wiretapping; fighting for fiscal responsibility including tough common sense budget rules that will help end the reckless policies that have heaped a mountain of debt on our children and grandchildren; as well as my strong belief in guaranteed healthcare for all Americans and substantial investment in alternative energy sources and technologies.

Yet, while I've certainly enjoyed the repeated comments or buttons saying, "Run Russ Run", or "Russ in '08", I often felt that if a piece of Wisconsin swiss cheese had taken the same positions I've taken, it would have elicited the same standing ovations. This is because the hunger for progressive change we feel is obviously not about me but about the desire for a genuinely different Democratic Party that is ready to begin to reverse the 25 years of growing extremism we have endured.

I'm sure a campaign for President would have been a great adventure and helpful in advancing a progressive agenda. At this time, however, I believe I can best advance that progressive agenda as a Senator with significant seniority in the new Senate serving on the Foreign Relations, Intelligence, Judiciary and Budget Committees. Although I have given it a lot of thought, I cannot muster the same enthusiasm for a race for President while I am trying simultaneously to advance our agenda in the Senate. In other words, if I really wanted to run for President, regardless of the odds or other possible candidates, I would do so. However, to put my family and all of my friends and supporters through such a process without having a very strong desire to run, seems inappropriate to me. And, yes, while I would strongly prefer that our nominee in 2008 be someone who had the judgment to oppose the Iraq war from the beginning, I am prepared to work as hard as I can through the Progressive Patriots Fund, and consistent with my duties in the Senate, to maintain or increase our gains from November 7 in the Congress and, of course, to elect a Democrat as President in 2008.

Most important, I want to continue my work as a Senator from this wonderful State of Wisconsin. Our fourteen year ongoing conversation that has taken place in hundreds of communities in Wisconsin in the form of open Listening Sessions is the principal reason I have been perceived as "ahead of the curve" on many key issues. Simply listening to the reasoning and passions of Wisconsinites remains the best source of good ideas and common sense I've ever encountered.

I love this country very much and am so lucky to be able to serve it in the United States Senate. My heartfelt thanks to all of you for your support and encouragement.

Sincerely,

Russ

Russ Feingold
Middleton, Wisconsin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-17-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
25. Locking - not LBN
The article is dated Novemer 9th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC