Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Murtha Calls Ethics Bill ‘Total Crap’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
MarkTwain Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:24 PM
Original message
Murtha Calls Ethics Bill ‘Total Crap’
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 02:26 PM by MarkTwain
Murtha Calls Ethics Bill ‘Total Crap’
By John Bresnahan
Roll Call Staff
Wednesday, Nov. 15; 1:18 pm

Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) told a group of Democratic moderates on Tuesday that an ethics and lobbying reform bill being pushed by party leaders was “total crap,” but said that he would work to enact the legislation because Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) supports it.

http://www.rollcall.com/issues/1_1/breakingnews/16030-1.html


Further attribution:

Murtha: Dem Ethics Reform Is "Total Crap"
By Justin Rood - November 15, 2006, 1:36 PM
Roll Call (sub. req.) reports this breaking news:

Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.) told a group of Democratic moderates on Tuesday that an ethics and lobbying reform bill being pushed by party leaders was “total crap,” but said that he would work to enact the legislation because Speaker-to-be Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) supports it.
Murtha and Rep. Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) are locked in a battle for the House Majority Leader post, and both men made presentations for to the Blue Dog Coalition on Tuesday in a bid for their votes.

“Even though I think it’s total crap, I’ll vote for it and pass it because that’s what Nancy wants,” Murtha told the Blue Dogs, according to three sources who were at the meeting. . . .

http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/001995.php

... what's that old saying about enough rope and the art of hanging oneself?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for him!
I'd rather have one or two very LOUD Dems voicing their concerns than a group following in lockstep like the Republicans do.

Give em hell Jack!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meganmonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I would much prefer that they not only voice, but also
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 02:35 PM by meganmonkey
vote their concerns :shrug:

on edit: seems that the context of his comment is in question. If it is being misinterpreted then my comment may not apply - but in general, I still stand by it :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occulus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
26. EVERYONE PLEASE READ THE WHOLE THREAD AND FOLLOW THE LINKS BEFORE POSTING
Had to shout because not everyone reading this thread will "get it". In fact, there are probably people reading as I post this who are becoming outraged at Murtha.

He didn't call the bill 'crap'.

He called the NEED for the bill 'crap'.

This is another way to swiftboat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
30. Murtha is NOT being 'swiftboated' cause Congress can NOT police itself
It never has and it never will.

Murtha knows this, he just doesn't want anything to cramp his pork procurement style.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Sure. That's it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamin lib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Murtha's office offered a clarification saying that
the entire context of Murtha's comment was that it's total crap to have to pass an ethics rule and we (the House) should police ourselves without it.

Do I believe it? It's as good as any other "clarification" I've heard form anyone else . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HaggardsMethDealer Donating Member (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. haha...
Yeah, because that has obviously been working out great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Considering how the republicans acted for the last 6 years
They DO need a rock solid ethics bill. Again the Dems are going to have to clean up the mess - and ethics RULES will make the psycho-childen of the republican party responsible (we hope).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. That works about as well as it does when corporations are asked to
"voluntarily" put caps on pollution, or create their own health and safety standards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
20. Yes! This is what he said. I heard it from his own mouth on KO
last evening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
torrentprime Donating Member (212 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow
God, I hope he loses the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sallyseven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. God forbid he loses.
Maybe you should spend some time outside of this forum and read what is really being said. Murtha said that it is not right that grown up people should have to be told how to behave. They should know how to do so. Really logical to me. If your getting this from the media you know they are skewing this to make the dems look bad. I heard him on Hardball and it was completely different than what the rest of the media was saying. Deney Hoyer does not like Nancy Pelosi. Wants her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
31. Right, because everyone in Congress is Oh, so ethical. He's just sorry his pork
might have to follow stricter guidelines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Murtha continues to do his best to destroy his chances as majortiy leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Dunham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I think that Murtha is now finished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #7
19. So does the entire Lieberman wing of the Democratic party. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #19
27. It's more like a "remote annex" isn't it, a "satellite party", a splinter group?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Please see this thread:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
11. weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
louis-t Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. Can you say "mis-quote"?
I knew you could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. Is it crap because he is possibly guilty of ethics violations?
Is this the kind of leadership we want? Sheesh! Sounds as idiotic as the Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 05:37 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. He is not! Why are you trashing a dem like Murtha? Show
me where he's guilty of violations of any 'crap' and then talk this 'crap'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #21
24. He dodged a bullet in 1980 by turning down a $50K bribe in an FBI sting
But left the door open to "doing business together" later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rcdean Donating Member (229 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. That accusation against him is total crap
If I were an ethical politician and somebody offered me a bribe, I would turn it down, but leave the door open, too. I would then be prepared to contact the FBI if there should be further attempts.

The fact is--the important, key, overriding fact is--that he turned it down. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
33. I would have told them to pound sand
And called the FBI on the first attempt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msmcghee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. This is troubling . .
He's caught almost accepting a bribe, not turning the briber over to the FBI - and now he thinks that congress-critters don't need any ethics rules. Well, this voter thinks they do - and he works for me, not the other way around.

Are we going to forget about ethics that fast now that we have control of congress. This makes me very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 05:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. He was exonerated of any guilt whatsoever back in the day and
now you want to retry him 10 elections later! CRAP I SAY! CRAP!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #15
35. He was "caught almost accepting a bribe"?
Don't you mean that he not caught because he refused to accept a bribe?

War is Peace. Ignorance is Strength. Refusing a bribe is not ethical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm Curious About this Bill Being "Crap" (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-15-06 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think I am most disturbed ....
Edited on Wed Nov-15-06 11:35 PM by Trajan
by one DUer's obvious vendetta against Rep Murtha ...

How many ANTI-Murtha threads does this make for you ?

The one's I have read have had murky and unsubstantiated assertions that have been shown to be false .... Wassup with that ?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. why nancy why????
are you supporting this person??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #18
23. Because she is an intelligent woman who knows from experience
this man's unblemished character. Are you a swiftboater wannabe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #23
34. don't insult me
why are you taking this personally? i just don't think either of her "choices" are good ones. that doesn't make me a swiftboater! :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarkTwain Donating Member (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #18
32. Because she has, in less than a week...
.. proven herself beholden to the same old, same old way of doing business in the Old Boys Club.

Plain and simple: she doesn't want them to pull the rope-stairs up the tree so she is excluded from the clubhouse.

Otherwise, why would she bend over so quickly by supporting a severely challenged and comprimised, both legally and ethically, man for Majority Leader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. It's the DLC's way or the highway. Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
25. The ethics bill isn't total crap. It is so weak and watered down
it is not even strong enough to be labeled crap, it should be labelled pee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
29. Murtha isn't being swiftboated. The chance Congress can control themselves
without rules and regulations and punishments being in place is non-existant.

He knows that. And if he doesn't he's a fool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mhatrw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-16-06 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #29
37. It's just like Kerry and Dean. All this emphasis on a single phrase. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 05:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC