Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN/AP: Gonzales attacks court ruling against domestic spying: Critics "grave threat" to security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:49 PM
Original message
CNN/AP: Gonzales attacks court ruling against domestic spying: Critics "grave threat" to security
Gonzales attacks ruling against domestic spying
November 18, 2006

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Attorney General Alberto Gonzales contended Saturday that some critics of the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program were defining freedom in a way that presents a "grave threat" to U.S. security.

Gonzales was the second administration official in two days to attack a federal judge's ruling last August that the program was unconstitutional. Vice President Dick Cheney on Friday called the decision "an indefensible act of judicial overreaching."

Gonzales, in remarks prepared for delivery at the U.S. Air Force Academy in Colorado Springs, Colorado, said that some see the program as on the verge of stifling freedom rather that protecting the country.

"But this view is shortsighted," he said. "Its definition of freedom -- one utterly divorced from civic responsibility -- is superficial and is itself a grave threat to the liberty and security of the American people."

Gonzales and Cheney's attacks on the court order came as the administration was urging the lame-duck Congress to approve legislation authorizing the warrantless surveillance. The bill's chances are in doubt, however, because of Democratic opposition in the Senate, where 60 votes are required to end debate and vote....

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/11/18/gonzales.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. So he wants to save America from excess amounts of freedom
Sounds about *!^@ing right to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Gonzales would have found himself at home as a judge in the Third Reich
This man is a threat to our freedoms and to the Republic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. "grave threat"........(takes one to know one)..
Mutherfucker!

He and the rest of the BushCo thugs are the real threat to our security.

The Torture Czar needs a war crimes trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boston Critic Donating Member (606 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Positively Orwellian
They've apparently learned nothing from the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. THUG and CRIMINAL Alberto Gonzales follows NEOCON orders to the letter
And he doesn't even need 20 pieces of silver
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. See you in The Hague, Al! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fuck Gonzalas
His ass will be in prison soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Straight Shooter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. Can they please stop using the phrase "divorced from"?
I was never married to the idea that civl liberties should be sacrificed simply because the people in charge have no clue as to how to responsibly provide security.

Gonzales is sounding shrill. How long until he becomes utterly hysterical? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
7. We're not against domestic spying--we're against ILLEGAL domestic spying!
GET A FREAKING WARRANT! YOU'VE GOT 72 HOURS IN WHICH TO DO THE FREAKING PAPERWORK! GET A FREAKING WARRANT!!!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
okoboji Donating Member (510 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
30. but they won't
these bastards know that most of their requests for warrants would be turned down, because they would be getting them for "normal" people having nothing to do with terrorist, like grannies for the end to the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niceypoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Freedom is a grave threat to US security?
Um, as of November 7th that crap doesn't wash anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
9. This should prove to all that grave threat to democracy...
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 08:37 PM by davekriss
...persists in the form of the Bush regime, still entrenched in the executive branch. They gotta' go!

Gonzales is going to go down in history as one of the most disgusting scourges against democracy. He has been providing the Bush Regime cover for awhile, gives them "plausible deniability" in the form of faux legal/constitutional opinion. Gonzo must know the errors inherent in his opinions and thus is an opportunistic leach attaching himself to the coat-tails of rising fascism -- or he got his legal degree from the back of a matchbook cover, which with his case is certainly plausible!

First of all, Gonzo (you idiot), this is not about a "superficial" definition of freedom, it is about our self-given (as in "We the People") constitutional right to privacy. And it is also about maintaining checks-and-balances on any current or future rogue executive who would like to trample all over these rights and principles to further personal aims.

This man, Alberto Gonzales, truly disgusts me; every patriotic American should be very concerned that someone so diminished in his capacity to know what the United States is supposed to be about serves as Attorney General. This, too, must change.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gonzales threatens the Supreme Court & World court
Who is this guy??? Attorney General is not an elected official and HE SERVES the Constitution and America ....Not King Bush


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
12. Does anyone else find it more than interesting...
That he gave this bon mot at the ultimate prep school for the Fundadelic Shock Troopen, The Air Farce Academy?

If the facist crackdown comes, these guys are gonna be at the forefront. Dobson all but pwns the place.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. He's a Fucking Liar and a Criminal!
Place the man in an orange jumpsuit already... he makes me sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
14. I think we have to presume that they're spying on Nancy Pelosi and other
members of Congress, on anyone who could get in their way--judges, governors, secretaries of state, presidential candidates, political organizers, and potential whistleblowers regarding their many, many crimes--and are trying to gather blackmail and other information with which to threaten and intimidate people. That's the only reason they could be defending warrantless wiretapping, when the warrant can be obtained 72 hours AFTER the spying. This provision of the law eliminates any bar to spying activity in an emergency situation. If the spying is justified, it will be approved in retrospect by one of these special insider judges. Clearly, they don't want to have--and cannot bear--ANY scrutiny of their spying activities. As with torture--a crime they have also insisted on committing, against all reason, common sense, ethics and the advice of military and intelligence professionals--I think we can be sure that what they are doing has nothing to do with our safety, and everything to do with covering up crimes and silencing opposition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. They don't need wiretaps, they've got James Carville!
I kid, I kid!

*uck Gonzales and Cheney and AT&T, too!

These wiretaps are a CLEAR violation of our 4th amendment rights.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Me: Alberto Gonzales "grave threat" to the Constitution and civil liberties
Just ask Ben Franklin, you soulless dick:

"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. Jeepers! For a second there I though you posted
a picture of our dog! Looks just like our wonderful mutt. I love that great quote from Ben Franklin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Is your dog a shepherd mix?
Thanks for your nice comment -- she's an Australian Shepherd, so perhaps yours is part Aussie?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yes, mostly Aussie , as far as I know. He has the same
spots over the eyes and coloration. He has that shepherding instinct, intelligent, so sensitive and social. He is my favorite dog of all time; getting on in age, darn it, just like me. We have a chow/shepherd mix with the similar markings and colors. She is a sweet dog, very motherly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes, that's such a great description of Aussies: intelligent, sensitive, and social
I've had several of them, and I just love the breed. But it is so sad when they start getting old; almost all of mine have lived to a ripe old age, however, so I hope you will have him for a good long while yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. so it's either protect the country or having freedom
interesting though

NOT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
19. It is a dark, dark day for America
that this man is the Chief Law Officer of the Nation. The Founding Fathers are hanging their heads in shame and disgust.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubykc Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
23. The only threat to freedom and security is the...
freedom and security of not being illegally spied on by our government. I'm just waiting for all of these souless bastards to be fitted for orange jump-suits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
25. They're scared. Good.
Let's KEEP 'em scared.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FernBell Donating Member (233 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
26. The neocons know the tide has turned against them.
This amounts to a cry of defeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
27. Don't Tread on Me, Al
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 09:10 AM
Response to Original message
28. So we should sacrifice liberty for security, huh Albert?
It doesn't matter. Don Alberto will eventually be put on trial for war crimes somewhere in the EU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
minnesota_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
29. Gonzales has no legal basis for objecting to the ruling, so he's
Edited on Sun Nov-19-06 09:49 AM by minnesota_liberal
... criticizing it with rhetoric - something you really want to see in an Attorney General.

Cast those in the right as shortsighted and unpatriotic. Do a little fearmongering. Label any judge who sides with the Constitution as a radical who's guilty of either overreaching or legislating from the bench. And wave the flag, conveniently ignoring that it symbolizes the very freedoms you are trying to quash.

Gonzales is just another cog in the Bush2 neo-Fascist machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jazzjunkysue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-19-06 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Here come the judge." n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Original message
32. AG Gonzales: warrantless surveillance needed
By Associated Press
November 19, 2006
AIR FORCE ACADEMY, Colo. _ Attorney General Alberto Gonzales contended Saturday that some critics of the Bush administration's warrantless surveillance program were defining freedom in a way that presents a ''grave threat'' to U.S. security.

Gonzales was the second administration official in two days to attack a federal judge's ruling last August that the program was unconstitutional. Vice President Dick Cheney on Friday called the decision ''an indefensible act of judicial overreaching.''

Gonzales, told about 400 cadets from the academy's political science and law classes, that some see the program as on the verge of stifling freedom rather that protecting the country.

''But this view is shortsighted,'' he said. ''Its definition of freedom _ one utterly divorced from civic responsibility _ is superficial and is itself a grave threat to the liberty and security of the American people.''
~snip~

more:http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_5156132,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. The Only People Who Desperately Need Surveillance Are
Members of the Bush Administration. Keep an eye on each and every one of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. New Attorney General needed
Preferably one with an understanding of the Bill of Rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
35. Alberto F&cking Gonzales, the Torture Guy, presents a "severe threat."
What an absolute travesty... Another totally unqualified Bush stooge, a real estate lawyer from Texas who's never paid any attention to the Constitution except to use it to wipe his ass with...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeighAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #35
47. That's well put
Hear hear
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
36. it's an indefenseible act all right, Cheney just misspoke
Edited on Sun Nov-19-06 01:50 PM by notadmblnd
what it is..... is an indefensible act of Executive overreaching. Wasn't he named along with Rumsfeld and Yoo in that war crimes briefing the German prosecutor was to file? Yeah, Bertie.. keep talking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. What part of "Bill of Rights" is Gonzales too stupid to comprehend? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
38. Can you believe the gaul of this Administration? However, they'll keep
violating until Nancy Pelosi, Harry "Bipartisan" Reid and other leaders, along with an angry America population tell them to go straight to hell.

When will people realize the only way to stop bullies is to STOP THEM.

There is no diplomacy or logic with bullies.

Only tough brute force given in full right back. That seems to be the only language they understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. Exactly why does the Busholini Regime need Warrentless
Spying? Tapping can occur without a Warrent for three days. Then a Warrent must be sought from a FISA Judge. That is the Law. If the spying is legit there shouldn't be a problem to obtain further permission. I suspect that more is going on than spying upon "Terrorists, "Enemy Combatents" &/or anyone assisting "Enemies of the State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow2u3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #39
41. They have to snoop on the Democrats
in order to intimidate the 110th Congress from doing their jobs as representatives for the American people. Does this answer your question?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
40. What bullshit
Why the hell did the country set up FISA courts in the first place? It's not as though they didn't allow for any flexibility. There was plenty - and allowed for some three days of wiretapping before acquiring the warrant.

And FISA wiretap warrants have rarely, if ever been denied and are secretly given.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
42. Somebody wake Gonzo up and tell him the bogeyman left the
building. We're no longer allowing them to scare the bejesus out of us on a daily basis. With the 72 hour rule, there's no reason not to get a warrant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Az_lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
43. How come Gonzo don't like our freedom?
by W's definition doesn't that make him a terrorist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #43
45. Good point
Edited on Sun Nov-19-06 10:43 PM by Art_from_Ark
I would love to hear Duhbyuh's circular logic in trying to explain that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
44. Warrants needed
for surveillance. It's really not that hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihelpu2see Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-20-06 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #32
46. How do we dis-bar this moron?? I figure if we take his law license away
he can no longer be AG... Right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat Apr 20th 2024, 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC