Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge Bars N.Y. Times in Libel Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:06 PM
Original message
Judge Bars N.Y. Times in Libel Defense
November 18, 2006

ALEXANDRIA, Va. -- A federal judge has ruled The New York Times may not rely on information from a columnist's confidential sources in its defense against a libel lawsuit filed over the newspaper's coverage of the 2001 anthrax attacks.

Former Army scientist Steven Hatfill, once identified by authorities as a "person of interest" in the anthrax mailings that killed five people in late 2001, is suing the Times for libel for a series of articles written by columnist Nicholas Kristof.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Liam O'Grady issued the ruling Friday as a sanction against the newspaper for refusing to disclose the identities of two confidential FBI sources used by Kristof. O'Grady had earlier ruled that Hatfill needed "an opportunity to question the confidential sources and determine if Mr. Kristof accurately reported information the sources provided."

The Times had cited FBI sources in reporting Hatfill was one of a limited number of people with the access and technical expertise to manufacture the anthrax and that he failed lie-detector tests. Hatfill was a physician and bioterrorism expert who worked at the Army's infectious disease laboratory at Fort Detrick, Md., in the late 1990s.

http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-anthrax-hatfill,0,4152323.story?coll=sns-ap-nation-headlines

If you're going to accuse someone of committing serious crimes, your sources better be willing to give up their anonymity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
William769 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope the judge keeps the N.Y. Times feet to the fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. but this was a smear campaign in collusion with the government.
Edited on Sat Nov-18-06 09:14 PM by bullimiami
the nyt knew what they were doing just like when they let judy beat the lying drums of war on their front pages.

i hope it costs them a bundle. the only thing they care about is money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'd like to know who their FBI sources were
that smeared Hatfield. I wouldn't be surprised if Hatfield's 'friend' Jerome Hauer was in the middle of this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good.... Serves Them Right for Peddling Judith Miller's War Propaganda
that was criminal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-18-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. turn, turn, turn.....
"You went into jail in the summer. It is fall now. You will have stories to cover--Iraqi elections and suicide bombers, biological threats and the Iranian nuclear program. Out West, where you vacation, the aspens will already be turning. They turn in clusters, because their roots connect them. Come back to work---and life. Until then, you will remain in my thoughts and prayers."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC