Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tapes Provide First Glimpse of Secret Gitmo Panels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 07:33 PM
Original message
Tapes Provide First Glimpse of Secret Gitmo Panels
This is a really sickening story that I heard this morning on NPR. My apologies if this is a dupe or not considered LBN.

"Tapes Provide First Glimpse of Secret Gitmo Panels"
by Jackie Northam Morning Edition, November 21, 2006.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=6514923

Audio recordings obtained by NPR provide the outside world with its first window into the secret world of military tribunals at the U.S. prison camp for terrorism suspects at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

The recordings, made by the U.S. military, are of tribunals held in the fall of 2004 to review the "enemy combatant" status of six detainees who were arrested in Bosnia in late 2001. Lawyers for the men obtained the tapes under the Freedom of Information Act and provided NPR with copies of the recordings.

(snip)

Lawyers at Seton Hall University recently evaluated the records and transcripts for nearly 400 similar military hearings at Guantanamo. In most cases, they found, the government did not produce any witnesses at the tribunals, and detainees were only allowed to use other detainees at witnesses.

"Ninety-six percent of the time, {the government} produced no evidence of any sort," Seton Hall law professor Mark Denbeaux told NPR's Robert Siegel. Denbeaux represents two detainees and co-authored the report.

"They relied instead on secret evidence that was classified," Denbeaux says. "And the government's procedure was, anything in that secret evidence was presumed to be valuable and valid. And then the detainee was given the opportunity to rebut the secret evidence. But he was never told what the secret evidence was."

.................
The recordings are at the link and the proceedings are utterly farcical. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is SO wrong.
notice, this is BEFORE the detainee bill was even mentioned in congress. imagine how grim it is now. god help them. and us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. That's a really good point.
Yeah the tapes I heard were from two 2004 trials and what do you know, both guys were re-certified as "enemy combatants" and are still rotting away in Gitmo two years later, and still have not been charged with anything!

It's so unbelievably twisted. The saddest part is that they were both apologizing to the kangaroo court and wondering why the witnesses they'd requested hadn't shown up. Nobody told them they hadn't even been contacted. :cry:


Hadj Boudella (left) and Mustafa Ait Idir were arrested in Bosnia on suspicion of plotting to bomb the U.S. and British embassies in Sarajevo. After their acquittal by a Bosnian court, they were taken into custody by U.S. officials and sent to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Family photos
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joemurphy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. This is would be laughable if real human lives weren't at stake.
But they are. Anyone who values due process and civil liberties should be outraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's utterly unbelievable.
What's worse is that thanks to the detainee bill, this is their one and only chance to get their case reviewed. After this, nothing, they're stuck there until they die, literally.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. more people need to know about this.
why are the lawyers not screaming bloody murder?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I wish I knew.
I just heard a Pacifica interview with the lawyer who requested the tapes, Mark Denbeaux, and he says it's even worse than it sounds -- on the few occasions a tribunal releases a detainee, they're simply tried and retried until a second or third panel recertifies them as enemy combatants.

Is that straight out of Kafka or what?

p.s. here's a link to his report that he gave on the radio:

"Latest GUANTÁNAMO REPORT: No-Hearing Hearings"
http://law.shu.edu/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Oh my god.
From the article:

In three of the 102 CSRT returns reviewed, the Tribunal found the detainee to
be not/no-longer an enemy combatant. In each case, the Defense Department
ordered a new Tribunal convened, and the detainee was then found to be an
enemy combatant. In one instance, a detainee was found to no longer be an
enemy combatant by two Tribunals, before a third Tribunal was convened
which then found the detainee to be an enemy combatant.


I don't know how Kafka-esque this is (I'm not as familiar with his work as our well-read Great Leader) but this is the sort of thing that makes me lay awake at night.

Disturbing, absolutely f**king disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Disturbing is right.
What in hell do they think they're going to do with these guys, anyway? Do they really think their families are going to just forget about them, or let the rest of the world forget about them? It's insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. If you're talking about the Bush clan...
they probably don't think about things like that - don't want to dirty their beautiful minds with such rot. The rest of the conspirators, I don't know. I guess if you've already convinced yourself that these people are truly "threats" then it isn't that far of a jump to dehumanizing them to where they don't have families (at least as far as the jailors are concerned).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dammit Ann Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. i just listened to most of this.
i am appalled, ashamed and dismayed. we are not america if this is happening. war is crime, this is shameful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveG Donating Member (833 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. can we say "Kangaroo Courts?"
that's what these travesties amount to. They are complete shams, and mock everything that our founding fathers stood for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Exactly.
It's like they're trying to add insult to injury, and knowing these clowns, they probably are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-21-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. Gitmo isn't a gulag, it's the repukes version of the Inquisition. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
14. Who knew Kafka was an American writer?
Talk about metamorphosis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. I was just thinking how Kafkaesque this was
And just as in The Trial, their punishment is meted out without their ever knowing why they were punished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
15. You have to ask yourself
in circumstances like that, why go through the motions at all? Sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-22-06 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
16. Ninety-six percent of the time, {the government} produced no evidence of any sort
Then the government obviously has no case. The detainee should be released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC