Anna Politkovskaja is one among few journos who covers Russias 'anti-terror campaign' in Chechnya in a critial manner. But president Putin don't have room for spirited and investigative journo's in his reinstallment of a migty and proud Russia.
The journalist Anna Politkovskaja works in the Moscow-based paper Novaja Gazeta, and has since summer of 1999 covered Russia's intervention in Chechnya in a critical and fair manner. Politkovskaja refuses to follow the laws adverse to freedom of speech that is implemented for journo's in Chechnya, and won't let Russian officers and generals set the agenda for what's legal to report from the war arena. First and foremost, Anna Politkovskaja wants to get to talk to the civilian population, and see for herself how Russian soldiers behaves in the break out republic.
(...)
During the first conflict in Chechnya (1994-1996) the Russian press was very much against the war started by then president Jeltsin. and the strong critical stance of the media was a major reason Jeltsin withdrew his forces.
After several acts of terror in Moscow in September 1999 and growing unrest in the neighbour republic Dagestan, gave then prime minister Vladimir Putin, which practically ruled Russia, a welcome opportunity to attack Chechnya again.
Chechen terrorists was appointed to be the perpetrators behind the bomb attacks, and Putin 'had to strike back' (There's still no proof Chechens was behind the terror attacks). This fitted well with plans of the Kremlin to get Putin elected as Russias next president half a year later.
The government had learnt from the failed information strategy during the start of the first campaign. The govt. didn't want to get the people and the press against the policies. Subsequently, all communication was sentralized and a vertical stream of information ensured. Before the war the Kremlin had started a press ministery, and the same day the intervention started, a press centre, Rosinformsentr, was started.
This is where the journo's got access to loads of official information. But most important: The government started to arrange press tours into the war areas. The journo's should be invited to write home about what the Russian state considered important, and under the pretext that it was very dangerous to travel the Chechen republic by their own, journo's was refused entrance to Chechnya.
Almost all media was enrolled into the Kremlin media strategy. In a thought-provoking article in Nordic East Forum (nr.2, 2001), the correspondent for Aftenposten, Per Kristian Aale, shows that recognized papers like Izvestija and Nezavisimaja Gazeta almost exclusively used (official) Russian sources in their reporting. Aale also shows that the rethoric used by the government on press conferences and in press briefings was swallowed raw by the media. Chechens was labeled 'bandits', 'terrorists', 'rebels' and 'islamic fundamentalists'. Instead of 'Chechen platoons' the term was 'bandit groups'. The Chechen point of view and unbiased terms are not present at all. Anna Politkovskaja is one of the few who tries to correct this unbalanced picture of the conflict.
(Strange to read a situation so similar to the situation in the US, no? Perspective ...)
(...)
So, what's so special with the reporting Anna Politkovskaja does, and what set's her apart from the most of other Russian journo's?
(...)
The following is picked from an article in November 1999:
- We don't need a Putin threatening to 'crush the terrorists, even if we have to follow them into the loo', but a Putin who would defend the weak. A Putin who would keep an eye on his cabinet. We don't need a Putin who is genuflecting to the power structures, but a Putin who would stand in solidarity with his fellow citizens, with the people who suffers, with those who dies in the bombings or becomes hostage to terrorists who's pressured into a corner.
(...)
The journalist (Politkovskaja) writes in a very Soviet tradition, where subjective point of views and personal experience is very present. The Soviet and Russian press has for a long time been heavily influenced by the New Journalism paradigm, originating in the US in the 60's.
But what makes the strongest impression in Politkovskaja's reporting is her meeting with both Russian and Chechen people, and also this is a marked difference between Politkovskaja and the majority of her colleagues. She let both Russians and Chechens have their say, and tells many tragic tales.
(...)
Politkovskaja has for herself experienced arrests and harrassment from Russian troops. In February 2001 she was taken prisoner inside Chechnya and accused of supporting Chechen rebels. She was released after spending some days in prison, and tells of being accused of supporting terror, threatened with harm to her children, and almost raped. The Russian authorities would probably try to frighten Anna Politkovskaja into silence. But her cry for help has only gotten stronger. Anna Politkovskaja is recognized internationally for her work, but in Russia she's no hero. In an interview with the magazine Journalisten in summer 2001, she told that 70% of the feedback on her work is negative. The Russian people sees her as an enemy of the people, and also her colleagues is giving her a hard time. More than often she's seen as a threat to national security. In autumn 2001 she had to escape to Vienna, when a group of Russian officers printed an ad in a Russian paper where they declared Politkovskaja to be an enemy of Russia. Today, she's always surrounded by bodyguards when she's in her home city of Moscow.
(...)
The Russian authorities does not want a strong and independent fourth state power in their frail democracy, and it seems they've managed to succeed in their project to guard the population from journalism critical towards the power of state. In March 2002, Politkovskaja's paper Novaja Gazeta was fined 1,5 million USD for having printed incorrect claims about corruption inside the state apparatus. It is very visible how this paper was singled out for investigation from authorities, says Russian and international campaigners for free speech.
The Russian authorities has time after time shown that if a paper or TV-channel trangresses the limit for what they see as justified criticism, economic sanctions are applied. The accuses is tried for a court that is many cases are corrupt and biased. This form of 'hidden censorship' is proven in many times in today's Russia. In Easter 2001, the system-criticizing TV-channel NTV was taken over by the state, just to mention some cases that, after all, has been mentioned in the Western press.
Now they want to erase Politkovskaja's pen as well.
----------------------------------------------------
This is a quick translation from a Norwegian article from the Oslo university, Media faculty, by Arne Vestbø:
http://www.media.uio.no/mediert/artikler/2002/2002nr2/2002nr2s14.htmlAny mangled English should be attributed to me, not him ;-)
The title of the article play's on the title of her book; A Small Corner of Hell: Dispatches from Chechnya.
A note on edit: It may not be that book, the Norw. reference says 'A translation of her book "A Travel in Hell"' in Norwegian. I see the other one came out in 2003.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Politkovskayahttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anna_Politkovskaya_assassinationR.I.P. Anna Politkovskaja and Alexander Litvinenko. Hopefully, your job will be taken up by others.