Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US sabotaged Australian wheat deal in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:27 PM
Original message
US sabotaged Australian wheat deal in Iraq
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 12:27 PM by Barrett808
US sabotaged Australian wheat deal in Iraq
Richard Baker
November 25, 2006

THE United States intervened to sabotage a huge wheat contract agreed upon by AWB and Iraq during a series of secret meetings in Cairo last year, less than two years after Australia joined America to topple Saddam Hussein.

Senior US officials in Baghdad complained to Iraqi Government ministers in January last year - 10 months before the United Nations exposed AWB's kickbacks to Saddam Hussein - after learning Australia had landed a $900 million wheat deal with Iraq.

Sources familiar with the AWB trip to Cairo last year said the US learnt of the deal after representatives from America's foreign agriculture service followed AWB executives around Cairo. In response to the US complaints, Iraq cancelled the AWB deal and called off a planned visit to Canberra by Iraq's then trade minister, Muhammed al-Jabouri, in February last year.

Details of the American's wheat intervention come as Commissioner Terence Cole, QC, handed his five-volume report into the Iraq wheat scandal to Governor-General Michael Jeffery at Admiralty House in Sydney yesterday.

The report is expected to say there was "no evidence" ministers or the department knew about AWB's corrupt payments to Saddam. The report will be made public early next week.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/us-sabotaged-australian-wheat-deal-in-iraq/2006/11/24/1164341401011.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Boy, this government will screw ANYONE, even their bestest buds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not quite as simple as it appears.
It seems that AWB, the Australian wheat exporter, is not on the up and up, being involved in kickbacks defrauding the Australian people, etc: Read more _here_.

I'm not defending this maladministration by any stretch of the imagination and I don't disagree with your comment -- however, in this particular instance, U.S. intervention may have been appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Okay, I'll give you that the AWB may not be the most ethical
government organization on the face of this planet.

But then, you tell me what government cabinet or organization in the United States would you trust right now? Let's go all the way back to the days shortly after the picture of bush** and Cheney and Powell and the boys in the Oval Office even before the election dust settled. What bunch of boys and girls in the bush** administration would you say are the most honest and ethical.

There obviously is no honor amongst this bunch of thieves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
silverweb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-26-06 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The leaders are corrupt to the core.
However, there are still plenty of honorable people working in various government jobs -- and just maybe someone was doing their job right and did a good thing in getting this AWB deal scuttled.

All I'm saying is that the current case does not appear to be just a clear-cut, simple matter of evil U.S. agents sabotaging an innocent Australian wheat deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-25-06 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, Haggard DID insist that he never "took" any meth...
Edited on Sat Nov-25-06 01:15 PM by rocknation
could it be that we owe him an apology?

:evilgrin:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC