Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Judge strikes down part of Bush anti-terror order

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 08:42 PM
Original message
Judge strikes down part of Bush anti-terror order
http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=domesticNews&storyid=2006-11-29T012759Z_01_N28295799_RTRUKOC_0_US-USA-JUDGE-BUSH.xml

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - A federal judge in Los Angeles, who previously struck down sections of the Patriot Act, has ruled that provisions of an anti-terrorism order issued by President George W. Bush after September 11 are unconstitutional.

U.S. District Judge Audrey Collins found that part of the law, signed by Bush on September 23, 2001 and used to freeze the assets of terrorist organizations, violated the Constitution because it put no apparent limit on the president's powers to place groups on that list.

Ruling in a lawsuit brought against the Treasury Department in 2005 by the Center for Constitutional Rights, Collins also threw out a portion of Bush's order which applied the law to those who associate with the designated organizations.

"This law gave the president unfettered authority to create blacklists, an authority president Bush then used to empower the Secretary of the Treasury to impose guilt by association," said David Cole of the Washington-based Center for Constitutional Rights.

"The court's decision confirms that even in fighting terror, unchecked executive authority and trampling on fundamental freedoms is not a permissible option," he said in a statement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. knock every one of those unconstitutional laws right back at'em
way to go! :bounce: :patriot:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unchecked executive authority and trampling on fundamental freedoms may not
be permissible, but that's what Repugs, Repigs, and Rethugs do and who in this administration gives a shit what that federal judge or anybody or institution says: the uniter will unite in his inimitable fashion and the decider will decide everything, EOS, move on, got that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's see where this goes on appeal
A step in the right direction surely, but if overturned it isn't a very big step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. Get this judge a bodyguard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spillthebeans Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. he should check his brakes and eat at home eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 02:01 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. and no small planes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spillthebeans Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. yes indeed eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bada bing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-28-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R! Thank god!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. What's wrong with giving a guy that the majority of people think is a complete
moran infinite power to detain people at will??? I mean c'mon! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
9. Great news!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC