Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Army to deploy more ("aerostat") balloons to Iraq ($77.5 million contract)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:54 AM
Original message
U.S. Army to deploy more ("aerostat") balloons to Iraq ($77.5 million contract)

http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20061129-102403-8056r

U.S. Army to deploy more balloons to Iraq

WASHINGTON, Nov. 29 (UPI) -- The United States will be expanding its use a balloon-based surveillance system in Iraq.

The U.S. Army awarded a $77.5 million contract to Lockheed Martin for the Persistent Threat Detection System (PTDS), which uses a large balloon tethered to the ground as a platform for cameras and other sensors to monitor the area around high-value assets and installations.

Referred to as an "aerostat" system, the PTDS was first deployed in Iraq two years ago. The new units will be delivered to the military within the next several months, Lockheed said Wednesday in a news release.

"Aerostat surveillance systems give the Army the reliable and constant information and intelligence collection capability vital to protecting deployed personnel and high-value assets," said Lockheed's Ron Browning. "Our team is committed to completing the PTDS production and integration to field the systems as quickly as possible."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ewagner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Balloons?
Can you say "target practice"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. What You Figure, About $10 M Per Unit? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. They gotta spend that money while they still can.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Nice targets
:rofl:


:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. you beat me to it . . . sitting (err . . . hovering?) ducks . . .
and $77.5 million for balloons? . . . someone's making some BIG profits on this one! . . .

used to be called "war profiteering," and it was thoroughly illegal . . .

come to think of it, it still IS . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. There is one of these types of things not far from
where I grew up along the gulf coast, anchored out in a marsh. I think its a drug related balloon for watching for low flying aircraft. The locals are always taking pot shots at it with a .22, and after a couple of weeks, they bring it down to repair it.

I suspect the Iraqis will make quick work of these floating targets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsmesgd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
6. will the balloons be in the shape of a poodle?
Slingshots anyone?

Oh the Huge Manatee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MurrayDelph Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. It is balloon!!


(btw, would a poodle-shaped balloon look like Tony Blair?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. By George I think I've spotted an insurgent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
driver8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Who are they sending next? Buzz Lightyear??
I'm surprised Halliburton didn't get this contract...one more thing for them to fuck up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happyslug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. For more see the following:
Edited on Wed Nov-29-06 04:36 PM by happyslug
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh yeah, now BALLOONS, that's the ticket!
This will definitely turn the tide in our favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hop on the PTDS for Some PTSD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anotherdrew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. they should have had lines of these along every border by day 3
but no, they did jack and shit for securing the borders
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. They were used during the US civil war, why not the Iraqi
civil war?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Briarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-29-06 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. WW1 anyone?
what next, zeppelins?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC