Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Bill) Clinton calls Iraq 'civil war,' against withdrawal timetable

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:03 PM
Original message
(Bill) Clinton calls Iraq 'civil war,' against withdrawal timetable

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2006/11/clinton-calls-iraq-civil-war-against.html

Clinton calls Iraq 'civil war,' against withdrawal timetable

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Former President Bill Clinton told CNN Thursday he agrees with those who have labeled the situation in Iraq a "civil war," but -- differing from top congressional Democrats -- said he's against setting a definite timetable for withdrawal.

"We probably shouldn't set a definite timetable right now because we don't want to lose all the leverage we have to get others in the surrounding countries to work with us, and to get the Iraqi political forces to try to get more and more people to choose politics over violence," Clinton told Soledad O'Brien on "American Morning."

In the ongoing semantics debate over what to call the situation in Iraq, Clinton said he would call it a 'civil war.' "That's a big definitional argument, but most Americans would say that's pretty much what it is," Clinton said. "You've got not only the Sunni, the Shia, the Kurds, you've got the tribal conflicts, the intra-Shiite conflicts."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. Par for the course with that guy.
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 12:07 PM by w4rma
It's my understanding that Clinton has been advising Prime Minister Blair since before the start of this whole thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good old Bill. Making another royal pronouncement that flies
in the face of what is good for the US and what the poor US soldier on the ground wants as well as what the majority of Americans want.

Too bad he didn't go into detail about what 'leverage' it is that we have over there now.

Bill's another one who didn't serve, isn't he?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. ...and serving in Vietnam
was a good thing for the country to ask Americans to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. F**k no! But this clown recommending that we not set a
date for a pull out NOW is such hypocrisy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. This is Hillary's position
She is beholden to a certain faction in New York for $$$$$ and other key support
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elehhhhna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's been sleeping at Poppy's feet too long.
God knows BC's had problems with Father figures but CHRIST ON A RAFT could he pick one who's no the goddmaned DEVIL already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. What "leverage"? We don't have any and everyone knows it.
I am disappointed in BC. This is probably just politics for Hillary's run - don't want her to look weak, you know.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. Clinton is perhaps the only person in American politics
who is anywhere near as irrelevant as *. I'm disappointed but not surprised in his response. He needs to model himself after Jim Webb and quit trying to be like Joe Loserman. And I don't believe he realizes the damage this kind of fence sitting is going to do to Hillary's hopes to be elected prez in 08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Damn easy for him to say...
his ass isn't getting fired at daily in Iraq. :mad:

He of ALL people should have learned the lessons from Vietnam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. How the hell would he have learned anything from Viet Nam?
Hell, bush** has more service time in than Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. The first problem is he is wrong person to be saying these things.
But on the other hand it, the bad hand, * looks quite intractable from ever wanting to leave so this will only help the polarization.
All of what is going on just seems too inevitable and the violence will be at a scream when the troops pull back, bet on it x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Well, Lucky me..
I've been right there with Blair, King Abdullah, Maliki, and all the important people that know exactly whats going on in Iraq. I've talked to ALL the troops, their Commanding Officers...I've even had coffee with Condi and she told me all the bad stuff thats really going on behind the scenes..

So, "I" only "ME" has enough information to make an informed decision about what to do in Iraq..

Give me a break...yada, yada, yada,...the blind leading the blind with nothing more than tear downs in the offing.

pfffffffffttt!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. Covering For The Missus?
Last I heard, Mrs. Clinton's sticking to her guns on the Iraq war being a good thing. Anyone hear different lately?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. He'll still be triangulating when he's three days dead
He's sure smart and charismatic though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wisteria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
13. Unfortunately, Clinton seems to be playing politics with this war.
The leverage comment is ridiculous. What leverage do we have now even though we are there currently with no date to begin withdraw. It is an excuse to stay the middle ground and not make any tough choices. Positioning for 08 it appears. Still being able to criticize the war and it's handling but not taking a leadership position on it.
And you know, no DLC Democrat will suggest cutting off funding.
So this amount to Clinton saying- stay the course till whenever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BenDavid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. What, are you all pissed at
Clinton because what he says makes damn good sense. If one would just drop back a moment and remember it was after Clinton handed Chris Wallace his ass on the Faux News program that democrats finally decided to grow a set and became more forceful and upbeat about the November elections. Not saying it was all Clinton cause there were a lot of other Democrats that we hardly heard from and then afterwards the party has a whole stood up and starting hitting republicans and the media hard with the big hammer....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
17. Hmmm, sounds remarkably similar to Wes Clark's USA OpED. No? n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. My, how DU has changed. Every post (except one) is pissed at Clinton
Have you considered listening, even comprehending his comments? Are you open to compromise of your position? Or are you just radically entrenched, unmovable stalwarts of your cause? Not a very Democratic trait, wouldn't you say?

Such smearing and hatred from people at DU. We used to save that for the bad guys.

Peace, everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Maybe because there's a lot to be pissed about.
I saw Clinton speak at San Jose State University when he was on the campaign trail the first go round. I came away from the event excited about what I had heard and actually hopeful about the future under his Presidency. I fiercely defended him during impeachment -- that was the thing that got me radicalized and involved with online activism. I joined Move-On when they called an end to the witchhunt.

With that said, as time goes by, my impression of him has done one, long nosedive. During the Bush Administration -- when his country needed him most -- he has been wrong much more often than right. Yes, his exchange on Faux engergized and liberated the Dems, but that hasn't made up for what he has failed to do.

Once again, he takes the triangulated approach to Iraq. This while our troops are in a fucking meat grinder and Iraq is going to hell.

I'll start listening to him when he has something worthwhile to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. I am one of his biggest fans
He's the only one who can go onto Fox News and leave with Chris Wallace's ass in his briefcase. But he has this irritating habit of equivocating on alot of issues. Like gays in the military, for example.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tellurian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Well, I for one am not pissed at Clinton..
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 09:43 PM by Tellurian
I don't understand why or how people can form such defined opinions based on a news report?
It is as Spock would say..."illogical conclusions", something humans are prone to do. How can
anyone judge Clinton by what you hear in the news.. Is it logical or smart to show your cards
to the opposition when you're sitting at the poker table?

What I see is not triangulation but Clinton juxtaposing. Just as he has been doing for the last 6 yrs.
Leave the man alone and let him work.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
21. Bill is on the ball, but Hillary is lagging far behind
She is still stuck on "sectarian violence."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC