Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Woman: Soldier's Casket on Baggage Cart

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
LetsGoMurphys Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:12 PM
Original message
Woman: Soldier's Casket on Baggage Cart
The Army is investigating a woman's claim that a soldier's flag-draped casket was placed in an airport baggage cart with other luggage while being transferred between airline flights.
"The Army is always concerned with treating all of our fallen comrades' remains with the utmost dignity and respect," spokesman Lt. Col. Kevin Arata said in a statement Thursday.

Cynthia Hoag, 56, a former Army reservist, said she was waiting for a flight at Rochester International Airport on Oct. 27 when she saw the coffin taken off a commercial flight along with passengers' luggage. A uniformed soldier accompanied the coffin as it was placed in a baggage car and transported to another flight, she said.

"At the very least, couldn't there have been a hearse to transport the fallen soldier?" Hoag asked in an essay in Tuesday's Democrat and Chronicle newspaper. "At the very least, couldn't there have been a group of soldiers to receive one of their own?


<http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/30/D8LNLSJ80.html> Read the whole thing, very disturbing. Who in their right mind could do this w/o thinking it was wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FyurFly Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Sick sick shit n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. FTA ALL THE WAY
Sick SOB's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Read the whole article and it's possible the woman's lying. . .
So until the whole story's known, think I'll withhold judgement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmejack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. My first thought was the dimensions of a baggage cart.
I'll bet the airport guy is correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. If the woman is lying, the airport and Army would have responded with facts
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 07:02 PM by rocknation
and explanations, not PR flack doubletalk!

But there's a very simple way to settle this--let's go to the surveillance tape, and don't tell me it's against policy or that the dog ate it!

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. What sort of facts are you looking for? Besides, of course, the statement. . .
of procedures which the Army presented, something that is not PR doubletalk, and has been established procedures since at least the Vietnam conflict. You'd know this, if you'd served.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. They can deny or confirm that the woman saw what she claims to
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 10:54 PM by rocknation
That's easy enough. And simply explaining what the procedures are doesn't explain why they weren't followed, or what's going to be done to prevent such a thing from happening again.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 11:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. What shred of evidence do you have the deceased was active duty? . . .
None. What scintilla of proof can you offer that this alleged coffin was not that of a retired military, being sent for burial by their family -- such a coffin would be accompanied by an honor guard pulled from the ranks of the Reserves, but its transport would not be the responsibility of the US armed forces or the government.

Better yet, what possible information can you bring to bear on the idea this incident ever happened, and isn't just the fevered imaginings of a drunken traveler? Remember, only four people -- and only one with a name -- are said to have witnessed this event in the heart of a busy airport?

As I stated at the outset, I'll reserve judgement until more is known. But hey -- jump to conclusions, fly off the handle, form whatever ignorant opinion you must -- I can't stop you and certainly reason won't get in your way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hasn't this been going on all along?
I was under the impression commercial airlines were being used more and more - and this would be the way they get the casket off the plane.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. I remember Cindy Sheehan telling of her son's body's
arrival and there was little dignity involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scairp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. I don't know
The Army is totally denying this could or would ever happen, and at the end of the article, it states that the reporter couldn't reach her again for the story. I will reserve judgment until I hear more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lautremont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is there really a problem?
The body has to be transported somehow, and hearses don't rise up to meet airplane cargo bays. This is not the public part of the returning deceased's trip, this is the private part. The bereaved are not present. Utilitarian transport methods should be perfectly acceptable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dchill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. "utmost dignity"
These people don't even know what that means. Actions speak louder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. If this is true, why is it an issue?
The time to respect people is when they're alive. Once they are dead, respecting the body is only an issue in that it's gentler on the family, and they weren't there to see. In any case, they weren't flinging the coffin about, they were just moving it with equipment for moving heavy stuff.

The idea that somebody needs to summon a hearse just to shuttle a coffin from one part of the airport to another is simply wasteful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LetsGoMurphys Donating Member (564 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I just dont think that it should be w/ people's luggage
very disrespectful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. But is there a logical reason why not or just vauge superstition?
I really don't see what the issue is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
psychopomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. If it was with other luggage, then I agree with you
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 06:50 PM by psychopomp
but if it was riding alone in a baggage cart, I have to agree with posters no. 7 and 9.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Granted, my dad was not a fallen soldier,
and there was no veteran's flag on the shipping casket used to get him back to Minnesota for burial. But, when we changed planes in Chicago, the casket was put on the kind of cart used for baggage. We had enough time between our flights that my mom stood at the window to make sure they off loaded pop despite the well meant efforts of an airline representative to move her along. (This was back when the airlines had real service. Given the circumstances we were traveling under, a Northwest staff person met us in Chicago to make sure we got to the right gate for the next flight. She even stayed with us in a private waiting area until it was time to board. The rep also went to the trouble of checking that dad was on the next plane with us to reassure my mother.)

Using the baggage cart and baggage workers who are familiar with the airline's process was probably the most efficient way to make sure he was put on the right connecting flight. It would have upset everyone a lot more if we had arrived in Minneapolis and the body didn't.

It's been many, many years but I can't say it bothered me then or now that his casket was handled this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. TORO TURD!
Edited on Thu Nov-30-06 06:56 PM by rocknation
...Airport director David Damelio disputed Hoag's claims, saying a coffin wouldn't fit into a cart loaded with luggage.
But it would fit into a cart that WASN'T loaded with baggage, wouldn't it? And Hoag DOESN'T SAY that the baggage car was loaded was baggage, DID she?

A Pentagon spokeswoman...said Hoag's description doesn't correlate with military procedure.
Therefore--what? Therefore, Hoag is either lying or fantasizing? Thefore, it did not and could not have happened? Therefore, it wasn't actually a flag-draped coffin? What WAS it, then--part of a smuggling operation?

Geez, talk about saying nothing well!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. the army does not give a damn about dead soldiers except as PR nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-30-06 09:44 PM
Response to Original message
19. No disrespect here...unless someone took a picture of the casket or read the
names of the fallen on a broadcast. That we cannot stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC