Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McKinney introduces bill to impeach Bush

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
oberliner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 09:58 PM
Original message
McKinney introduces bill to impeach Bush
WASHINGTON - In what was likely her final legislative act in Congress, outgoing Georgia Rep. Cynthia McKinney introduced a bill Friday to impeach President Bush.

The legislation has no chance of passing and serves as a symbolic parting shot not only at Bush but also at Democratic leaders. Incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has made clear that she will not entertain proposals to sanction Bush and has warned the liberal wing of her party against making political hay of impeachment.

McKinney, a Democrat who drew national headlines in March when she struck a Capitol police officer, has long insisted that Bush was never legitimately elected. In introducing her legislation in the final hours of the current Congress, she said Bush had violated his oath of office to defend the Constitution and the nation's laws.

In the bill, she accused Bush of misleading Congress on the war in Iraq and violating privacy laws with his domestic spying program.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061209/ap_on_go_co/mckinney_impeachment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. For those of us who'd really like to see the asswipe impeached
this doesn't help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hate drive-bys...
What's your beef?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Consider the source: Cynthia McKinney
If she actually cared about the impeachment's success, she would have not done this, because it will hurt rather than help it happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Only for people who like kool aid. The same people think
we found WMD and that Chavez is a dictator.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I lived in Decatur for awhile and DeKalb County actually had to hire
a lobbyist to represent our interests in the US Congress because our Congresswoman (whom we paid ~$150K per year) didn't. I won't miss her, and I'm proud that DeKalb County will ALWAYS send a Dem to Capitol Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
39. Can you back this statement up with any reputable news source? n/t
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:36 AM
Response to Reply #7
46. Baloney. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cookie wookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #7
94. What a crock of bull.
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 10:10 PM by Cookie wookie
What we have now, thanks to those who pushed McKinney out, is little mr republican lite.

McKinney has the guts and ethics to officially call for impeachment. She's a brave, beautiful woman. Anyone who stands up for democratic rights and for the American people to Rumsfeld & Bush in the public arena, while everyone else is hiding under the tables, is the epitome of courage. After all, even though they can ruin careers (like what happened to her), if they are willing to send our troops to war on based on lies, if they are willing to commit all the crimes it appears they have committed, no one who speaks up against them can do it without looking over their shoulder. Amazing how those who put her down seem to come out of the woodwork on threads like this. Also a wonder that they never produce any evidence of wrongdoing on her part, nothing but gossip, smears, and innuendos -- or being echo chambers for the corporate media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. bull crap...
and I am considering the source... the one that regurgitates corp-whores spin. I'm very familiar with that source as it's highly recognizable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. So much more effective to cower & cry, "Impeachment is off the table."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Yes, consider the source: she's been right about everything so far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:46 AM
Response to Reply #17
49. Well done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
18. It 's just fine, don't worry. She's staying true to herself. :-)
MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. It's a parting shot at every Democrat...
This bill does two things: gives the media an opportunity to paint Dems as nuts, and makes it harder to impeach Bush should a future opportunity arrive. If the upcoming investigations turn up some serious dirt on Bush that starts a media circus and impeachment becomes a real possibility, the moment someone starts discussing it the Repugs will start running TV commercials of McKinney and try to paint every Dem as a psycho extremist. Good riddance to McKinney; she's been nothing but a liability for the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. I'll bookmark your post, and will check back later as events warrant to see if your worry is
justified.

If impeaching gwb is seriously on the table, I'll be watching for the "Cynthia McKinney is dem and she wanted impeachment and all Dems are psycho extremist ads" of which you speak.

Your post does sound to me as if you're shaking in fear of the Republic's spin. I'll publicly post an apology for that perception if those ads appear. Otherwise, I'll hope you take this back if they don't.

We'll talk again if impeachment times rolls around. :hi: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #36
62. There is a time..
... for everything. It is not just an action that is necessarily correct, it is an action that happens at its proper time.

Impeachment is coming, but it is not yet time. Bush is digging his own grave, but he's still digging. Let him finish.

This action my McKinney is neither significant or unexpected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #62
66. Sendero, I'd love to copy and paste your post as a reply to each
hand wringing, teeth gnashing and hair tearing post on this thread.

Thanks for calmly, and with a few well chosen words, placing this event in perspective. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprobate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #62
106. Brings to mind old southern philosophy: When someone is digging his


own grave, don't steal his shovel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #106
118. Well said! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #31
41. Exactlly. McKinney takes one last opportunity to paint all Dems as
nuts. This does not help any real effort to impeach Smirk. I'm glad the people of her district saw fit to elect someone (anyone ) else. But it's a pity she felt the need to do damage to the last possible minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #41
45. Do you feel the same way about Conyers? I mean, after all, he introduced impeachment hearings long
before McKinney's bill. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:38 AM
Response to Reply #41
47. What is your problem with her? Exactly?
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 03:38 AM by sfexpat2000
And given the massive vote flipping, how in the world do you know she was voted out?

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #47
55. She's done more harm than good to the party...
I'm not saying every Dem should be a Lieberman clone, but her demeanor hasn't been politic at all. She tussled with that DC cop and came out of it looking very pissy and arrogant. She's associated with Louis Farrakhan and other known bigots, and there was some obvious anti-Semitism among her own staff. I don't think her dad's "J-E-W-S" statement helped much either. Conyers comes off as honest and respectable, and even right-wingers have to admit that he behaves professionally as a congressman. If you're going to investigate government wrongdoing, you have to frame the issue properly and demonstrate that you have reasonable issues with those in power, and McKinney's grandstanding hasn't helped. Basically, Conyers demonstrates the right way to speak truth to power while McKinney demonstrated the wrong way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #55
68. If the party can't withstand strong women's voices, it needs to eat
some Wheaties.

And, if we fall for the Thug's media manipulation, so do we.

Cynthia is not Conyers. She is also not the cartoon we've been sold in the media and by the right wing and by the party leaders who left her hanging in the wind because she inconveniently speaks up. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Irreverend IX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. Strong women's voices are no problem.
See Pelosi for more information. Stupid women's voices can cause serious problems, though. Playing nice-nice with Louis "God hates faggots and Jews" Farrakhan is not good for the party or the the progressive cause in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #71
84. Nancy is my rep, and my husband and I were taken off of the Clinton
campaign to open for her when she first ran. There's not much you can tell me about Nancy.

And, I'm glad she never stupidly suggested an anti-choice guy for DNC chair.

And, I'm super glad that the Thug media have never made any Democrat (John Kerry) seem weak, stupid or simply self-serving and arrogant.

And, the icing is, I'm extra super glad no Democrat embarrassed the party with guilt by association. (Man, this list could get reallllllllllllllllllly long, couldn't it?)

What kind of progressive wants progressives to fit into an easily consumable mold, anyway? Maybe a PINO? How in the name of God's green Earth do you progress if all you try to do is hold your ground?

Never mind.

Your "big" tent could use some

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. Impeachment should come after investigation
This was never about impeachment. It's just more grandstanding by someone who can't stand to be out of the limelight. It was never intended to accomplish anything.

Bye, Cynthia! :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #86
90. No, it was probably worked out with the leadership first.
I can't imagine anything coming to the floor that isn't at this point -- unless you think the Dem leadership is also completely out of control.

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #68
83. I encourage strong, rational women in the party,
and appreciate their leadership. But I think the rational part is important.

And McKinney only speaks up when it's convenient to her--to get her attention, to embarass other Dems. It's all about her. Always.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #83
85. So you buy the right wing "another crazy liberal" talking point?
Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. I've watched McKinney's behavior long enough to make up my own mind.
Liberal or not, I'm convinced she's crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #88
91. Please don't let me get between you and your beliefs.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #91
109. But she's so crazy!!!
I guess some people enjoy their right wing too much. Oh my she is so crazy! facts be damned, voting record be damned. She's not performed the proper public rituals required by beltway punditocracy!

Another poster said it well, IMO. This is insignificant in the bigger picture, and has no real chance of affecting the likelihood of impeachment in the next two years. It was merely the last chance for her to speak out on what the opposition would be doing if legislators were not so focused on getting back the White House and increasing the majority in both houses in 2008. In other words, the congress and senate in their proper role of providing oversight, should let the investigations lead where they may without regard to the committee members political careers, and without limits to the possible remedies of not-yet-started investigations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:03 AM
Response to Reply #31
53. Because the right wing owned media needs an excuse
to insult Democrats?

What crap. They do it every day. That's their job.

And, excuse me, the whole world knows Bush is a criminal. Any investigation we hold will be a mere formality. Hello? McFly?

A "psycho extremist"?

So, what other right wingnut talking points are you fond of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cookie wookie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
95. "she's been nothing but a liability for the party".
Would you mind being more specific? Exactly how has she been "nothing but a liability..."? Because the corporate media talking heads say so?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ken Burch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Oh, he can't handle it that Cynthia still doesn't "know her place"
n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
119. Her constituents decided that her place is NOT in the House of Representatives
but what do they know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. Introducing a bill on the last day Congress is in session?
That sounds like a drive-by to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. that's a statement...
something Democrats in Congress are loathe to do, because of reactions like yours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #34
102. It seems that Ms. McKinney likes to make a lot of 'statements'
Perhaps is she had backed up some of those statements with action she would have been reelected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #102
107. I think you have that backwards...
it is because she backed up those statements with action that she was not re-elected. I'm not buying...so you might as well quit selling. Plus this post is passe, so no one's going to view your witty quips.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #107
110. Other than slapping a cop, what actions did she take?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #110
114. ah..it's you again...
.....

* H CON RES 274: Reaffirming the continued importance and applicability of the Posse Comitatus Act. (Introduced 10/25/05)
* H CON RES 405: Opposing any agreement between the Government of the United States and the Government of Nigeria to deploy United States Armed Forces to Nigeria. (Introduced 5/17/2006)
* HR 2297: To establish the Arabia Mountain National Heritage Area. (Introduced 5/11/2005)
* HR 2554: To provide for the expeditious disclosure of records relevant to the life and assassination of Reverend Doctor Martin Luther King, Jr. (introduced 5/23/2005)
* HR 2690: To provide that a state may use a proportional voting system for multi-seat congressional districts, to require the use of instant runoff voting in certain elections for Federal office (introduced 5/26/2005)
* HR 3998: To provide farm debt and program relief to African American farmers who suffered discrimination in the administration of Department of Agriculture farm credit programs. (Introduced 10/6/2005)
* HR 4139: To minimize harm to populations impacted by the release of environmental contaminants, hazardous materials in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita by providing for a Comprehensive Environmental Sampling and Toxicity Assessment Plan (CESTAP) to assess and monitor air, water, soil and human populations. (Introduced 10/25/2005)
* HR 4209: To temporarily deny Federal assistance to the City of Gretna Police Department, the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office, and the Crescent City Connection Division Police Department in the State of Louisiana for their maltreatment of individuals seeking aid during the Hurricane Katrina crisis. (Introduced 11/2/2005)
* HR 4279: To redesignate the Federal building located at 935 Pennsylvania Avenue Northwest in the District of Columbia as the "Frank F. Church Federal Building". (Introduced 11/9/2005)
* HR 4968: To provide for the expeditious disclosure of records relevant to the life and death of Tupac Amaru Shakur. (Introduced 3/15/2006)
* HR 5303: To require the suspension of the use, sale, development, production, testing, and export of depleted uranium munitions pending the outcome of certain studies of the health effects of such munitions. (Introduced 5/4/2006)
* HR 5376: To require nationals of the United States that employs individuals in a foreign country to provide full transparency and disclosure in all their operations. (Introduced 5/11/2006)
* HR 5377: To require nationals of the United States that employs more than 20 persons in a foreign country to implement a Corporate Code of Conduct with respect to the employment of those persons. (Introduced 5/11/2006)
* HR 5378: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to reduce by 50 percent certain tax benefits allowable to profitable large corporations, which make certain workforce reductions. (Introduced 5/11/2006)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. I'm sure you didn't mean that in a racist sense. BTW, list of the other departing legislators' bills
Wonder if you'd apply "drive by" to these folks. MKJ


http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/R?d109:FLD010:+@eq+20061207
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #37
103. Ms. McKinney's ties to Louis Farrakhan certainly brings racism to mind
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:48 AM
Response to Reply #32
50. Or like a respective negotiation.
And what is YOUR interest in smearing Cynthia, Freddie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #50
79. Anyone with an association with Farrakhan and a staff which regularly
insults Jews and others doesn't need to be smeared. She does the damage with no help from the media.

She mostly just wants attention--and look! She's getting it. I'm glad her district came to its senses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #79
87. Answering for another poster, Dissing a Democrat.
Guilt by association. Assuming those tawdry elections 'results' reflect the will of the district.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #87
89. You lost. Move on. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #89
92. I LOST?!

That's funny. And it will be funnier every time Cynthia is proven right as she has been so far -- up to and including being targetted by the DC moran police.

I really look forward to every moment of that.

lol

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #50
104. Critiquing an ineffective legislative strategy is not a smear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
81. i am glad she did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I must be the exception that proves your rule.
Cynthia is a strong woman and she has my admiration and gratitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #5
30. Yea for her! She said what every American with a Brain
wanted to say.

Yes, she could have just left without saying a word but she took a Stand!

I for one am very proud of her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mitt Chovick Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Impeach the chimp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
8. In more ways than one
Cynthia is my hero. I think she is a true American. Peace on earth, Kim
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Henry B. Gonzalez is not around anymore
so somebody has to do it. HBG introduced a resolution to impeach Reagan. I'm not sure, but I think he also did one for Bush I. He fully supported the impeachment of Nixxon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
11. She is wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. A symbolic gesture, which I admire. Behold, a very partial list of legislation introduced yesterday.
Edited on Fri Dec-08-06 11:19 PM by BleedingHeartPatriot
Expressing the sense of Congress that the Government of the United States should submit the Government of Iraq a draft bilateral status-of-forces agreement by not later than June 1, 2007.
Sponsor: Rep Israel, Steve (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (2)
Committees: House International Relations
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. H.RES.1099 : Relating to consideration of the bill (H.R. 6111) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the Tax Court may review claims for equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend the running on the period of limitations while such claims are pending.
Sponsor: Rep Gingrey, Phil (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: House Rules
House Reports: 109-722
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 248.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. H.RES.1100 : Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6406) to modify temporarily certain rates of duty and make other technical amendments to the trade laws, to extend certain trade preference programs, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Dreier, David (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: House Rules
House Reports: 109-723
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 249.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. H.RES.1101 : Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 5682) to exempt from certain requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 a proposed nuclear agreement for cooperation with India.
Sponsor: Rep Bishop, Rob (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: House Rules
House Reports: 109-724
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Rule provides for consideration of the conference report to H.R. 5682.

5. H.RES.1102 : Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.
Sponsor: Rep Capito, Shelley Moore (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: House Rules
House Reports: 109-725
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Placed on the House Calendar, Calendar No. 251.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

6. H.RES.1103 : Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding modern-day slavery.
Sponsor: Rep Lee, Barbara (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (1)
Committees: House International Relations
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on International Relations.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

7. H.J.RES.102 : Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2007, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Lewis, Jerry (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: House Appropriations
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. H.R.6406 : To modify temporarily certain rates of duty and make other technical amendments to the trade laws, to extend certain trade preference programs, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Thomas, William M. (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: House Ways and Means
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1100 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 6406.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9. H.R.6407 : To reform the postal laws of the United States.
Sponsor: Rep Davis, Tom (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (3)
Committees: House Government Reform
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the House Committee on Government Reform.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

10. H.R.6408 : To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to extend expiring provisions, and for other purposes.
Sponsor: Rep Thomas, William M. (introduced 12/7/2006) Cosponsors (None)
Committees: House Ways and Means; House Energy and Commerce; House Resources; House Education and the Workforce; House Government Reform
Latest Major Action: 12/7/2006 Referred to House committee. Status: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committees on Energy and Commerce, Resources, Education and the Workforce, and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.


More bills at the link. Yet, Congresswoman McKinney's is the only one worthy of mention.

Hmmmm. MKJ

link: http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/R?d109:FLD010:+@eq+20061207
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
108. Apperently her constituents wanted a Representative who actually took action rather
then making symbolic gestures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #108
111. She lost the election.. then she introduced this bill
So your logic is unsound since the voters did not know of her intent to file this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freddie Stubbs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #111
112. He lack of action and accomplishments prior to the primary were
likely a factor. Ditto on her cop-slapping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #112
115. Perhaps
I'm just keeping the sequence of events straight.
:beer:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
13. What a great note to go out on!
I :loveya: Cynthia!

We will hear great things from her in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
14. Cynthia puts the rest of the dems to shame. Bravo Cynthia!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FogerRox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:37 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. Maybe she could run for President....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #14
44. Really?
She puts Bernie Sanders to shame? Dennis Kucinich? Zoe Lofgren? Barney Frank? Sherrod Brown? Ted Kennedy? Pat Leahy? That's just off the top of my head.

She's ineffective and divisive. Hell, even John Lewis didn't support her in the last election cycle. She's accomplished little. She grandstands and plays to a certain crowd. It speaks volumes that she's had such struggles to ge re-elected.

I'm glad she's out of the House, may she not return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #44
51. Yes, she puts them to shame, cali. And that she speaks to
black voters who are most of the time disposable or invisible to the party is only one more source of shame.

And, she will be back, sorry, because her "struggles to be re-elected" were mostly due to vote flipping machines that are getting a lot of scrutiny right now.

So sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #51
58. I couldn't disagree more about
her putting those folks to shame. In fact, I think it's the opposite. As for speaking for black voters, do you know how the black vote went in her district?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #58
67. All we can know is that voters started calling for help
in the earliest hours of voting because their votes for Cynthia were being flipped. Of course, nobody could help them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #67
69. Of course you
have real evidence supporting that the election was stolen from McKinney, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #69
80. Have I made that claim? No. I have stated that there was massive
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 05:08 PM by sfexpat2000
vote flipping from the earliest hours of voting.

We don't know. We can't know, can we?

You know that as well as I do. And to say that Cynthia was voted out requires fudging the fact that there is no way to verify her loss, and that that loss is suspect because of the vote flipping which all seemed to flip in favor of her opponent.

But, it could be just one of those co-incidences, glitches, whatever.

lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CueST Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
74. Here, here.
Or is it hear, here? Here, hear? Either way...McKinney's a joke, and has been nothing but a liability. Now she gets to feel all important and empowered by making a joke out of what could be an actual, important debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #74
100. Maybe you should sort out your homophones
before you slander progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CueST Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #100
116. All homophonical matters aside,
I stand by what I said. I think she's trivialized an important matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-08-06 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
20. Good for her!
History, I believe, will judge her as a heroine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
21. I'm gonna call my Congresscritter & tell him I want him to support the bill.
Fat chance, as he's as Repugnant as they come ... but I just wonder what would happen if we ALL did the same thing?

One thing's fer sure - the answer is "nothing" if we don't.

Regardless of all the "Pelosi's right to wait" & "we need investigations" arguments, it's up to We the People to make it happen. Articles of Impeachment are the first step to those investigations.

I'll do it anyway. It won't be the first time he's heard from me on the subject.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Freeusfromthechurch Donating Member (141 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:03 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. you go WritersBlock and I'll do the same
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 05:06 AM
Response to Original message
23. very damn symbolic! YES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
24. Rep. McKinney has more guts in her little finger
than the rest of congress in their combined bodies. I just wish she was going to be the next speaker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donsu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. agree - Kuchinich is right up there with her re: guts

gold star for McKinney
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmellsLikeDeanSpirit Donating Member (471 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
25. I don't know how Pelosi and Reid can just let Bush get away with pissing on the constitution
It baffles me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:40 AM
Response to Reply #25
48. They are setting up a perimeter, not a limit.
It took me a while to get that. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stlsaxman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 08:16 AM
Response to Reply #25
60. uh- it's only what... December 10th...?!?!?!
Pelosi and Reid have NO POWER until the 110th congress is sworn in.

Pelosi may be quoted as saying it's "off the table". She spoke of impeachment- not investigations which, I am absolutely positive, will go ahead full force once DEM's take control of BOTH houses.

"let Bush get away with pissing on the constitution"? Have a teeny bit of faith, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knight_of_the_star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
76. How about there was nothing they COULD do
They were locked out of power in both houses until January, once they are in investigations will begin and the bodies will be surfacing. We have to impeach Bush in the court of public opinion first before we can impeach him in the Houses of Congress. That way if we fail due to GOP partyline bullshit then at least we will have won a significant moral victory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
26. I'm not a McKinney fan, but good for her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #26
82. yes, but too bad----bush is laughing know it is off the table.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greccogirl Donating Member (566 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
27. I knew who this was after I read
the headline. And she wonders why she wasn't reelected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #27
38. Your insinuation is intriguing. I imagine you feel the same way about Conyers.
:eyes: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #27
54. If you knew this was after you read the headline
chances are it's a smear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #27
101. Ooh ... smart!
> I knew who this was after I read the headline.

Pretty good going really, considering her name was at the start of
the headline ...

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
29. Yeah, yeah, I know, how dare she? :sarcasm:
How dare she say what the rest of the Democrats are apparently too chicken to say, namely that the Bush administration has committed crimes (yes, crimes), including flouting the Constitution and committing war crimes, as defined at the Nuremberg Trials.

I first became aware of Cynthia McKinney when some long-time DUers, such as ulysses and CatWoman, supported her in her race against Denise Majette, and defended her against other DUers who got completely and irrationally bent out of shape over something McKinney's father said, but I didn't know anything about her till I saw her in action on CSPAN.

Just watching her for a few minutes convinced me that she is extremely intelligent and able to break through the smoke screens to hone in on the truth.

Obviously, the Republicans don't like her, and I fear that some Democrats, those whose relations with the corporations are too cozy and those who compromise overly much because they want to be in the cool clique and those who always have their PR consultants at their sides, think she makes them look wimpy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
59. I agree with Randi on this.
You caNOT start impeachment without investigations to provide PROOF of Bushes malfeasance. "He knew there were not WMD." Prove it. Once that is done, I'm on the bandwagon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lydia Leftcoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. I give her credit for putting the topic on the table, a topic that
too many other Dems were trying to ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #59
63. If you're not on the bandwagon now, you never will be.
Thanks for playing! :hi: MKJ

P.S. If you still desperately need that proof, start with googling Downing St. Memo, David Kay or "16 words". Brewster/Jennings is another avenue, for one attempt by the cabal to cover up the fact that they all knew. MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #63
105. Actually you should have phrased this
Edited on Mon Dec-11-06 10:43 AM by Puglover
"If you're not on MY bandwagon." And thanks but I'll pass. And a hearty ole :hi: back atcha!

If you're fond of using snarky phases like "if you desperately need proof" good luck luck at getting people on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #59
72. I could not agree more
I am still trying to find out why my post was deleted on this subject, but that is the way I see it as well.

Investigations and committees are needed to provide firm, conclusive evidence to support impeachment, so that is certain to be effective. A bill filed at the 11th hour in a lame-duck GOP controlled House just doesn't seem to accomplish much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
33. Actually, I think Pelosi has this one right. Start with "investigations" and
leak the results of the investigations to the public, within 6 months the public will be howling for Bush's head on a silver platter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKthatsIT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #33
99. Yes, but Cynthia was right, too.
We/she has the facts.

Downing Street Memo, for one.
Katrina was criminal neglect and broke Posse Comitatus law.
Constitutional Rights have been abused and denied, systematically.
Billions have gone missing or lost by bad management.

The 9/11 Commission was biased from the start, ending with evidence and witness suppression. 9/11 investigations must be reopened with full disclosure...under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steve2470 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
35. wtg ! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. Way to go GIRL! I for one will miss you in the HOUSE. Come BACK!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I guess most of you would rather have a bill to impeach than actual impeachment
Edited on Sat Dec-09-06 06:38 PM by CreekDog
Because that's what this last minute action accomplishes.

It will not impeach Bush and if it comes to a vote, it won't even get many votes, what without time to debate, time to investigate, etc.

So, like I said, those of you who think this is such a great idea and that she is a heroine, I guess you have pretty low standards.

If impeachment is going to happen, there needs to be some political support to do it and that doesn't happen just because a bill is introduced and because a president is unpopular...to get the margins and pressure necessary to make it happen takes coordinated and shrewd effort.

McKinney did none of this.

I have long thought that the causes she says she espouses are simply to garner her attention. The object is not to attract attention to the cause, but to use the cause to give her attention.

I'm glad we are about to be rid of her and her own solidly Democratic district agrees. But DU'ers know better than those voters, don't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-09-06 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Yikes, the elitist Dems aren't a myth.
"the causes she espouses are simply to garner her attention".

Channeling Jon Stewart, "and yet, as she returns to her quaint hamburg, she wilt perhaps bloviate in an unseemly way there, as well."

MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #42
52. I guess you know more than the ripped off voters in her district
don't you?

And I guess you know more about building a movement more than the bravest black woman in Congress, don't you? You'd do just fine if the Capitol police were assigned to harass you, wouldn't you?

And I guess from behind your magic keyboard you can do better than to stand tall in front of BushCo and speak truth to their murdering, lying, cheating and stealing, can't you?

Please tell us what district you will be running in, because if you can do better than Cynthia, we all need to support you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #52
56. I would say Barbara Lee is both braver and more effective than McKinney
Quixotic battle after Quixotic battle does not denote courage, character or effectiveness.

That she has gotten so little accomplished on these issues and certainly had opportunity to push them in a way that actually advanced the cause rather than her career (didn't actually help her much actually), I have my doubts that she actually cares about the causes she has spoken about. She certainly has done them more harm than good.

And I'm not second guessing the voters in her district. The Democrats in the primary threw her out and the solidly Democratic district elected another Democrat in her place.

You can say fraud about the election results all you want, but it's like many of McKinney's statements. All assertion, no facts, no substantiation and thus, no reason for a rational person to assume that what is being asserted is true.

Sorry to break it to you, but the doubts of her election loss are a lot weaker than the doubts surrounding both Kerry's and Gore's loss in the presidential election.

But that's like a lot else in McKinney's career.

I would prefer someone more effective to represent these causes than McKinney and someone more effective is not hard to find.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #56
57. We don't need a rehearsal here of right wing talking points.
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 05:06 AM by sfexpat2000
And only Friday Skinner posted an amusing recap of all the Quixotes that accurately predicted disaster in Iraq. Oh, these windmill tilters! They embarrass the party with their holding down the truthful edge of the platform! :rofl:

Sorry to break it to you, but you have no basis to believe the primary results unless you also believe in the Tooth Fairy and Santa. I was working that day, and the complaints of vote flipping came in immediately and they came in from voters, not from her campaign.

You know, effectiveness isn't always measured by headlines. In fact, these days, when the dogs bark, you now you must be hitting a nerve.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emillereid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #42
77. I think that anything that gets 'impeachment' into the public discourse
aids the cause. I don't expect McKinney's to be the last. I'm going to a townhall meeting tonight on impeachment -- wherein a serious case against Bush will be discussed. People are working at all levels of this issue.

I have met Ms. McKinney and she is extremely passionate about the issues and authentic to the core -- she does not seem to be on any kind of ego trip. In fact, I'd say she's a fearless fighter for the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
64. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #64
65. Never mind, deleted.
Edited on Sun Dec-10-06 11:23 AM by BleedingHeartPatriot
Thanks, mods!. :hi: MKJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #65
70. Now hold on a minute
What the hell is the post deleted for? We cannot post critical views of outgoing Democratic Party reps? That's be a pretty odd forum rule considering there are hundreds upon hundreds of posts here that ream Joe Lieberman (when he was a Dem) and Hillary Clinton on a daily basis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BleedingHeartPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #70
78. Name calling should be alerted. That's a RW tactic which shouldn't be here.
We can adamantly and passionately disagree with Dems. I completely disagree and don't understand how H.C. voted for the IWR. I won't vote for her in the primary, if she runs.

If she's our 08 candidate, I will vote for her. And, I'll still disagree with her on that issue.

However, I will not call her names, which is a freep speciality. And, the mods are right to delete those posts. Maybe, the posts to which you refer did not have anyone hit alert.

If one wants to degrade the Dem candidates, rather than disagree with their positions on domestic and international issues, then this is the wrong board.

MKJ

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VegasWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
73. Roll the word "impeach" around on your tongue! See it has a really good feel
to it. The word "impeach" just feels natural in your mouth. Sort of like oral sunshine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
75. Somewhat related: Mike Ruppert is now in Canada
He was always a big McKinney supporter. Ruppert has left Venezuela, and he's getting medical treatment for his condition in Toronto.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
93. Go Cynthia!! A rare voice for truth and justice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beth9999 Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-10-06 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
96. It's a shame...
...that she chose to take this parting shot at Bush. He's going to be gone by the time she runs to get her seat back anyway.

What she should have done is introduced a bill to rid us of the Repug justices on the Supreme Court (Roberts, Alito, Thomas and Scalia). If we don't get rid of them, they'll be around for twenty years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #96
97. There's no way to "get rid" of Supreme Court Justices
Edited on Mon Dec-11-06 12:27 AM by mycritters2
They're appointed for life, or until they choose to retire. The Constitution is written this way precisely to prevent their being targeted for political reasons.

But I doubt McKinney knows this much about the Constitution either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beth9999 Donating Member (138 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #97
98. Sure they can be impeached.
Samuel Chase was an associate justice who was impeached by Congress in 1805 (although he was acquitted by the Senate).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #98
117. And since that time, the doctrine of judicial independence
has been taken seriously by both the legislative and judicial branches.

And impeaching Supreme Court justices would lead to chaos. It won't happen. And it shouldn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-11-06 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
113. Cynthia, you're a hero, and you're doing a heroic thing.
Thanks for putting THAT on the congressional record. Becaues you ARE right. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC