Niger: NGOs to sue US over WMD claims

[MAX 1]

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,10117,21057...from=public_rss

NGOs to sue US over WMD claims
From correspondents in Niamey
January 14, 2007 05:08am

SOME 30 non-governmental organisations in Niger said overnight they are going to sue the United States for nearly two billion dollars for "unfairly accusing" Niger of selling uranium to the late Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein.

"Our lawyers are about to file a lawsuit against the US calling for damages of about 1000 billion CFA francs ($2.42 billion dollars) for the harm suffered" by the country, Moustapha Kadi, president of the Collective of organisations in Niger defending the right to energy (CODDAE).

The lawsuit by the collective will be filed at either French or Belgian courts, Kadi added.

In January 2003, US President George W. Bush accused Saddam of having bought uranium from Niger to make weapons of mass destruction.

The Niger collective said in a statement that investigations by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), world media and US officials, all concluded that it was a "false accusation" against Niger.

That false information was used by Bush "to invade Iraq," said the collective's statement, which also called for support from Niger's President Mamadou Tandja, who back in 2003 said the US allegations were "harming Niger's image".

Niger is the world's third-largest producer of uranium with about nine percent of the global market, according to 2003 figures.

The country's two uranium deposits have been mined for 40 years by the French group Areva, number one in civil nuclear energy.

[durtee librul]

1. Can we figure out a way

that they take it all from * and deadeye dick? better yet, demand they take the stand IN NIGER and then have them arrested there as well for crimes against humanity?

I would imagine someone would be angry with libel and slander because that's what it amounted to in the end.

[BleedingHeartPatriot]

2. Now there's some extremely interesting potential testimony. n/t

MKJ

[Totallybushed]

3. I wonder if this will work?

Do the European courts have either the legal authority, or the guts, to hold the USA government responsible for something that did not take place in their own countries? I don't know about the former, but I'm pretty sure they don't have the guts.

Why don't they try this in an American court, where they might have a chance, and the legal authority and guts both exist.

What will the actual complaint be: libel? Can a country be libeled?

Wish there was some way to hold the guilty to account, but my money is on this going nowhere.

[Neoma]

4. Page not found.

[maddezmom]

5. duplicate topic

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=2687649