Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: Study Questions Prospects for Much Lower Emissions

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Doondoo Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 06:40 AM
Original message
NYT: Study Questions Prospects for Much Lower Emissions
As Democratic leaders in Congress prepare to put climate change legislation on the agenda, some in the utility industry are arguing that it will take decades of investments and innovation to get substantial reductions in their emissions of greenhouse gases.

Electric power companies, which emit about one-third of America’s global warming gases, could reduce their emissions to below the levels of 1990, but that would take about 20 years, no matter how much the utilities spend, according to a new industry study.

The report, prepared by the Electric Power Research Institute, a nonprofit consortium, is portrayed as highly optimistic by its authors, who will present the findings on Thursday at an energy conference in Houston.

It assumes that “money grows on trees and all research is successful,” said one of them, Bryan J. Hannegan. “This is as good as we think we can get, right now.”



http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/15/business/15carbon.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 06:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Of COURSE it will take decades, cuz power companies have stonewalled
for 35 years, pooh-poohing concerns of environmentalists and calling them "wackos." They have wasted 35 years, years in which we could have taken the burgeoning env problems seriously, and simply raked in more money for themselves. Now that they are forced to face the problem, why, it'll take decades and, by the way, lots more money from the taxpayers!

GRRRRRRRRRRR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kindigger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Another point
There's been no money to upgrade or maintain infrastructure. Maybe they did think environmentalists were wackos, but we can add emission controls as we watch the rolling blackouts, bridges collapse, and on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC