Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Russia Warns U.S. On Iran Moves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:47 PM
Original message
Russia Warns U.S. On Iran Moves
MOSCOW, Feb. 21 (UPI) -- Russia's foreign minister Wednesday warned the United States not to take military action against Iran.

"The Russian foreign minister said Wednesday U.S.-led multinational foreign forces in Iraq must not conduct military operations outside the country, including against Iran," the RIA Novosti news agency reported.

"The multinational force in Iraq should abide strictly by the UN Security Council's mandate, which does not provide for any operations outside the country," Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov told the Lebanese magazine Al-Watan Al-Arabi in an interview.

"The escalation of the conflict and its possible spread beyond the Iraqi borders will inevitably result in catastrophic consequences and not for the Middle East alone," Lavrov said according to the report. "I believe Washington understands this."

---END OF EXCERPT---

http://www.upi.com/SecurityTerrorism/view.php?StoryID=20070221-100238-7697r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Journeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. That may be the problem. . .
Washington may understand exactly what it's getting into.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldtimecanuk Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well I am not trying to buff up an ego... But I have been saying...
in many of my posts that if the US attacks Iran there is no way in hell that either Russia or China are going to stand by and watch.... This would amount to probably World War 3 or 4 depending on whom you are speaking with.....

Unfortunately this is one issue I wish I were damn wrong about..... This to me signifies probably the end of the world as we know it for sure. If Cheney has his way, this will probably come to pass.

ww
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Why ARE they so hell bent on ending the world?
I really don't understand this.

Haven't they read, "The Road" by Cormack McCarthy? We all lose if there is a full-scale
nuclear war.

I really don't understand why they are so determined to cause
such destruction and suffering.

Are they---A---really psychopaths--who just want to destroy out of pure evil and control?
Are they--B--religious nutjobs who are trying to bring about the Rapture?
Are they--C-- just wanting to make billions more off of war--and the consequences are oblivious to them?

I dunno. I tend to think it's 25 percent A and 75 percent C.

I think their religion is nonexistent and was only used as a vote-getting device.

Who knows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. probably A,B & C combined. Also, consider that a DC insider-repug I know really believes the bs
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 08:59 PM by wordpix
of this maladministration, talking about "freedom" and "Saddam was a danger to the world and ties to al Quaeda" and "911." :puke: :crazy:

This repug is a very nice guy who's Ivy educated and he's honest. He's not a nutjob, not making $ off the war, not a religious wacko or evil. Go figure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeighAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Doesn't speak well for the Ivy League
Might have been a "legacy" scholar like Dubya.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. I have maintained the belief that these nutflucks are
endtimers.

They think that it's their job to end the world.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. I Wish that these "EndTimers"
would just End Their Own Times and just leave the rest of us the fuck alone.

I'm so sick of their Psychotic Crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. "The Deadly Meme"
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 10:57 PM by Dr_eldritch
There is a great anguish in humanity, and it has constructed an expedient and characteristic solution to it's pain;

The end of the human race and all human memory.

We know that there are one of two ultimate outcomes for the human race.
One is the transcendence of humanity by constant growth and enlightenment.
The other is absolute Oblivion

In the case of transcendence to the divine, humanity, or whatever we become on the path, will devise the means to achieve anything. One such thing will invariably be the preservation of all consciousness, all memory, every interaction and state of being ever dreamt. Including every fear, torment, and pain ever known.
(Just my HO) :)

Our race is in unfathomable pain, and though not all of us are so well-acquainted with it, I promise you that it transcends the death of it's constituents and has a very real life of it's own. This is the pain and the fear that makes so many so desperate to avoid pain that they wish with all their heart for everyone else to die... and to become immortal and impervious to pain and fear themselves. The great pain that wishes for oblivion has a grasp on these people. And that pain will get it's wish...

Unless we step up and stop it.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. D. All of the above nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CHIMO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not Necessarily So
With the US and NATO tied down in Afghanistan and Iraq, another country of 65 million people would really tie them up. I would imagine that another four years of also trying to control Iran, would end up with the collapse of the US and their allies.

And China, Russia and all the other aspiring powers didn't have to lift a finger. Sort of like a reverse of the Soviet collapse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mc jazz Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. yes, peak oil also
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 06:27 AM by mc jazz
I don't see Russia being drawn in on this. Mainly because they could let the US sort be forced into a less powerful entity and team up with China, the multi-polar world theory. Also Russia's armed forces are far from ready for any big war, they still need years of investment

Secondly I think peak oil comes into this, I got booted off peakoil.com for suggesting the 'peak' will not be a result of demand naturally exceeding supply but will be artificially brought on by a war (they wanted geopolitics out of the debate, and a nice clean... unrealistic curve on the graph). Anyway I think Putin is saying is the M.E. gets any worse the entire world economy could collapse into depression. His threat may just be warning them of the consequences of massive disruptions to the oil market which shouldn't be understimated as this could easily be a true 'lights out' scenario for large parts of the world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. I have been saying it too..Putin is gearing up....I suspect that he
may be getting his military ready...but this * administration is so one dimensional that they are not paying attention to other real threats...

The Russians hate Condi....a supposed expert on Russia...and you know she doesn't see it coming...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Right there with you.
I agree completely and have said the same as you here for years.
WAKE THE FUCK UP AMERICA.
AS IF China and Russia will stand idly by...
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. Neither
China nor Russia are going to risk their entire society to nuclear fallout. Bitch and moan, give aid to Iran in the form of weapons and supplies yeah. But they would never commit to complete annihilation over Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. Fallout can travel all the way around the world
Don't assume anyone would be safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Oh I don't
But I cannot believe the Russians are willing to risk it all over Iran. And China is so in bed with us economically that they would piss and moan from the sidelines as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Things can take surprising turns, though
The guns of August 1914 were set off by a rather long sequence of alliances which ultimately could be traced back to an assassination in Serbia. World War II came about (in part) because Hitler didn't expect France and Britain to go to the wall for Poland. You just never know ho these things can develop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let me count the ways
They , meaning the BCF do seem to want to debunk global warming , they are willing to pay experts to change their positions .

This tells me oil is their motto and goal .

They also would like to see the population downsized , I link this to the sad economy and the corporate interests which also links with oil and banking .

The global economy also spells it out well , they can now use cheap labor all over the globe and have done more to remove US jobs than to support a strong US economy .

People are no longer important , there are billions in the world at their dispence .

So based on just this alone they seem to feel all of this destruction is in their best interests which is the holder of the resource and this equals the power holders of the globe . They could care less about freedom or democracy these are simply phrases used to convince the public of false best intentions , after all look what they have done with our constitution and our rights .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carla Donating Member (294 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #4
31. I envision
Corporate Interests having a friendly chat with * and Darth Cheney in which they explain (like a pretzel in the throat) that these 2 yahoos are NOT to mess things up by going off half-cocked again. Iranian operatives and the intelligence services of Russia and China are very good at snuffing out competitors that don't have Secret Service bodyguards. Blackwell doesn't seem to have the expertise required to keep the BigBoys safe from a world gunning for them. Corporate Interests dictate that the next step is to wait 11 years and then try to install another *. Russia and China won't need to fire any missiles, they will just poison some sushi, if you know what I mean. Corporate Interests are essentially selfish and this logic seems compelling.
But logic doesn't play well within the Beltway, so miscalculations are possible. Let's all think good thoughts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. But but but, I thought Bush looked down Putins gullet and saw his
Edited on Wed Feb-21-07 08:49 PM by Rex
warm and fuzzy soul! How shocking Bush saw the wrong thing. Look...these assholes are just stupid and dangerous enough to start WWIII (all of them not just the BFEE). The perfect storm for another global war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. "perfect storm for another global war:" unfortunately, the next one is the end of the world as we
know it. Back to the Stone Age, if you survive. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftwingnut Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 08:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. I like to hear this from other countries...
problem is...I think I've heard it before...and before it didn't do any good. I'm still not convinced that this is anything more than just words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Just words
We must see what sanctions the UN decides to pass. Whatever meaningless minor slap on the wrist sanctions they decide,they will only hurt Iran's pride. Guess that would be a disaster greater than a foreign invasion.
ANd if sanctions are passed,Russia is in a perfect geographical position to run a black market sanction buster program.

All the mullahs have to do is read the current British press to see that a foreign invasion threat by the British is becoming a diminishing threat day by day.

SO lets just keep talking is all the Russians are saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftwingnut Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. oh? is that what the Russian's are saying?
Duh...jeez thanks for explaining that for me...uh...uh



What I'm saying is that yes...the Russians are in a great position to run a "black market sanction buster program" (I like that!)...and they would love to continue 'talking'. But let's imagine ShrubCo. does attack Iran and F***s up Russia's chances at running their "BMSBP"...what's Russia going to do?? That's where I'm at. When ShrubCo. attacks...what are these other countries going to ACTUALLY do??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio2007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I'll take that bet
Name the invasion date.

duhhhhhhhh


As the British reduce their troops...duhhhit makes even more sense we will invade....
well, you say invasion in June 2005,
or June 20006,
or June 2007
or June 2008
or June 2009, 2010, 2011 ????

no matter how much you pray for an invasion, it still hasn't happened,
And it won't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftwingnut Donating Member (843 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. I don't even know what your talking about.
buh bye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Isn't UPI a moonie outfit.
PS What is all that NATO firepower doing off the coast of Israel and Lebanon? Hmmm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Purveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Yes it is, however they reported correctly what was published by RIA Novosti...
For your view pleasure:

Military operations outside Iraq unacceptable - FM Lavrov

15:05 | 21/ 02/ 2007

MOSCOW, February 21 (RIA Novosti) - The Russian foreign minister said Wednesday U.S.-led multinational foreign forces in Iraq must not conduct military operations outside the country, including against Iran.

"The multinational force in Iraq should abide strictly by the UN Security Council's mandate, which does not provide for any operations outside the country," Sergei Lavrov said in an interview with weekly Lebanese magazine Al-Watan Al-Arabi.

The long-standing confrontation between the U.S. and Iran deteriorated further January 11 when American servicemen burst into Iran's mission in Erbil (Kurdistan) and detained five officials. American troops disarmed guards and confiscated computers and documents without providing any explanation.

Earlier this month the United States accused Iran of backing the insurgency and unrest in Iraq, and suspects the Islamic Republic of pursuing a secret nuclear weapons program.

"The escalation of the conflict and its possible spread beyond the Iraqi borders will inevitably result in catastrophic consequences and not for the Middle East alone," Lavrov said adding "I believe Washington understands this."

---end of excerpt---

Don't click on this link: http://en.rian.ru/world/20070221/61060841.html

The "moonies" are watching!!!

/chuckle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 01:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Before I reply to your post, I wanted to clarify what you meant by this:
The "moonies" are watching!!!

/chuckle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. * doesn't get that Iran is under the Sino-Russian umbrella now.
Iran will soon be a member of SCO, so if you think China and Russia are just going to sit idly by while we attack Iran, you're sadly mistaken.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/China/HD18Ad02.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-21-07 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. Washington understands but they are still going to war
that was in fates hands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
29. Aren't we already killing people in Somalia and the Phillipines?
Edited on Thu Feb-22-07 09:23 AM by Toots
We already expanded the borders without Congressional approval I might add.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
In Truth We Trust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
30. Where is tough as nails bad ass bush**'s rsponse to this. Crickets. FraWd,awol, coward. Maybe it is
time for commander codpiece to break out his mission accomplished dress up suit again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
32. Why haven't the real press outlets covered this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #32
37. Because WAR is good for the Media CEOs ... The USA's M$M is bought and paid for ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cosmicone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-22-07 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
33. Russia should be taken seriously
They have been supplying Iran the weaponry to defend. Especially their deadly anti-ship missiles that the US Navy has no defense against. If Iran sinks a carrier or two, Bushco will have an eye-opener.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC