Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Capture doesn't sway Clark

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:31 PM
Original message
Capture doesn't sway Clark
Capture doesn't sway Clark
Ex-general stays antiwar course

By Joanna Weiss, Globe Staff, 12/17/2003
http://www.boston.com/news/politics/president/clark/articles/2003/12/17/capture_doesnt_sway_clark/
Shortly after testifying at the war crimes trial of former Yugoslav president Slobodan Milosevic, retired Army General Wesley K. Clark called for a similar trial for Saddam Hussein, but still said he opposes the US intervention that led to Hussein's capture.

"The success of the mission in Iraq, it wouldn't of itself justify that it was . . . a wise decision to undertake at the time," the Democratic presidential candidate said by telephone from the Hague.

"There are any number of things we could do that successful that weren't done," Clark added, pointing out that the United States chose not to intervene against dictators in Liberia and Sierra Leone. "It just so happened that this administration chose to go into Iraq when there was apparently still no evidence of weapons of mass destruction."

Clark, who has staked his candidacy on opposition to the war, has tried in recent days to balance between cheering the capture of Hussein and opposing the US intervention in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. So is Lieberman going to come after Clark now?
Good for Clark. Stick to your guns!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cavebat2000 Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. THank you clark!
All these other people are flip-flopping worse than pancakes! lol.. and kerry said he doesn't do what public opinion says. Haha..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robbedvoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. NOW? Joe's teeth are stuck in Clark's ankle!
Here's a sample from a few days ago:
http://bestofblogs.forclark.com/story/2003/12/14/131042/70
Besides Zahn asked Clark the Joe question (if it were up to you, saddam would be in power?") My favorite answer was yesterday, when asked by another freeper: "I would have gone after Saddam in a different way, through UN. I'd like to think I'd have had both by now: OBL and Saddam"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. Check out those numbers.
Clark, Dean, and Kerry are "locked in. And they probably didn't have room to alter that," Landy said. "But I think it's a great difficulty for them. The public generally does think that the world is a safer place because Saddam has been captured."

Indeed, a Wall Street Journal/NBC poll of 512 adults, conducted Sunday night, showed that 60 percent of Americans would consider the war worthwhile even if weapons of mass destruction were never found, and 57 percent think Hussein's capture will make it easier to win the war on terror.


I was initially discouraged by these figures; then I realized that's a smaller portion of Americans than the ones who currently believe Saddam was behind 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. If the public wants to delude itself for a while, fine. It won't change
the reality that nothing is changed by his capture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Those numbers, to me, look the same
as before his capture, anyway. No biggee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-17-03 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good for him!
He's earned more of my respect by sticking to his guns, especially when a few of our other candidates are trying to bask in the Bush glow of Saddam's capture (big mistake). Smart man. Thank god for Clark, Dean, Kucinich, Mosely-Braun and Sharpton steadfastly and bravely speaking out against this war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhunt70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. its easy to stick to your guns when you tell the truth...<nt>
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TacticalPeek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Be blunt, bhunt . ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joefree1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Good for him
Another good man not trying to be Bush-lite.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthspeaker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. thumbs up for Clark
from this Dean supporter. Keep talking straight, General.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sonias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
11. Good for Clark!
I agree with previous posters, it's easy to stand your ground when you stick to the truth.

Sonia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I agree with the previous posts too.
Dean and Clark are telling the truth, even if the public is unwilling to accept it.

Kerry, Gephardt and Lieberman are no longer contenders in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guaranteed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-03 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. We shouldn't concede "success" to *, yet, either
Edited on Thu Dec-18-03 12:46 PM by BullGooseLoony
No WMD, and they don't even have a government yet. Still many Baathists in power (we're keeping them there), GI's dying every day.

Loooong way to go, folks.


On edit: Btw right on, Clark. Stand fast. You, Dean, Kucinich, are all in the right place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC