Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US mulls backing GM 'medicine rice'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
T_i_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 07:50 AM
Original message
US mulls backing GM 'medicine rice'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6422297.stm

Authorities in the United States have given preliminary approval to a plan to grow rice genetically modified to produce human proteins.

Rice plants including human genes involved in producing breast milk would be grown in the state of Kansas. Under the proposal, which received preliminary backing from the US Department of Agriculture last week, Ventria would plant rice over some 3,000 acres (1,215 ha) of farmland in the mid-western state.

The company behind the proposal, Ventria Bioscience, says the plants could be developed into medicines for diarrhoea and dehydration in infants.

Critics say parts of the rice plants could enter the food chain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pinniped Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. WTF?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
2. I believe I'll be shopping for brown rice in the Asian markets from now
on (assuming I'm not buying imported American rice wrapped in Korean writing).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. You make a big assumption
That Asian markets are not already using GM rice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:50 AM
Response to Original message
3. Question: why does the FDA not have to approve this?
If you market a product as a cure for something, must it not be approved by the FDA?
Not that the FDA wouldn't approve something if the money was right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Because this is food, not a drug
Merely making claims is not enough, thanks to that abomination of a law signed by Clinton which deregulated the "food suppliments" mega industry. If it is not marketed as a pharmaceutical, the FDA is powerless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-06-07 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. Good.
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC