Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: Bush to veto calls for withdrawal from Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:59 PM
Original message
White House: Bush to veto calls for withdrawal from Iraq

http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/03/white-house-bush-to-veto-calls-for.html

White House: Bush to veto calls for withdrawal from Iraq

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- President Bush would veto Democratic proposals to withdraw U.S. troops from Iraq in late 2007 or by the end of 2008, Dan Bartlett, Counselor to the president, said Thursday.

"The administration would vehemently oppose and ultimately veto any legislation that looked like what was described today," Bartlett said aboard Air Force One in route to Sao Paulo, Brazil.

"What we're seeing here is an artificial, precipitous withdrawal from Iraq based on, unfortunately, politics in Washington, not on conditions on the ground in Baghdad, Iraq," he added.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. K and R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fine, how do you like impeachment then, asshole?
It's either that, or we throw you out by force.

There's no way the public will stand for a Bush veto if it gets through congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DRoseDARs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. "...conditions on the ground..." Indeed, there's cake and roses petal on the ground everywhere...
Problem is, they're on the ground because a suicide bomber has taken out yet another market filled with people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partylessinOhio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, SO WHAT! Get off your duffs, Congress! Send his royal lowness
the legislation. Show you have some balls already!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. Bring it on.
let him run that veto pen dry. Force the issue back onto his desk as many times as we can until the criminal bastard is run out of office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Megahurtz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Now That's a Good Idea. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. GREAT! I hope all your PUB candidates tell you how much they
appreciate you dealing them the Death Card for the 08 election too!

The American people sent you a message in November, but as usual, you didn't get it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. He doesn't hold the moral highground on this threat.
Bring it on, Dimson. We can and should put the Party of Bush on record where they stand on this most important issue. Time for the Rubberstamping Party to make a decision...are you with Bush or with the American people? Methinks that they'll start to desert him as soon as the vote comes up and their bluff is called.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
9. Impeach. They impeached clinton for nothing. Why can't we
hold bush accountable for the murder of 10's of thousands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullimiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
10. he cant veto every spending bill and the pugs cant block them all.
if they do, theyll just run out of money anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Dems should have enough balls to just cut the funding for the troops. PERIOD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
22. There are too many "conservative" Dems
for that to pass.

There are also too many pukes in the Senate to override the inevitable veto.

I kind'a like their new strategy.

Win-Win

bush vetoes the supplemental -- he hates the troops

bush signs - he's committed to HIS timetable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. yes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. I dunno, but I think this may be a -good- thing...there will be
no doubt the war is ALL his if he vetoes

INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Political win if he vetos. Policy win if he signs. I'd rather have the policy win.
But the political win will help bring about the policy win later on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. BRING IT ON GEORGE!-------it will be your legacy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fine by me
This way we've got him--and the people who voted against it--on record.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Heh. Bet ol dimson is royally pissed at Reid et al.. and now he faces a really warm
welcome waiting for him in South America....heh

Could a chimpy meltdown be on the horizon? Are any of his keepers accompanying him I wonder? Condie? the Dick? Jim Beam?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
C_U_L8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Make him veto every day !
the asshole's gotta learn one day or another
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. I don't see that as much of a threat
There isn't any downside here, except insofar as Bush's stubborn refusal to treat with reality will consign even more people to an early death. But making a record of public opposition to the ongoing prosecution of this misguided imperial adventure, as well as affixing this war even more securely around the necks of the Republican party, while carrying out the will of the people, makes this a dare or a threat to be faced down squarely and resolutely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
remfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
18. I'd pay money to see that n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. Save this for the time they blame us for the war...you know they will!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
21. Cool.
He's going to veto the supplemental.

He must HATE the troops...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC