Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pet Food Maker to Take Financial Responsibility for Pet Deaths From Poisoning

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:45 PM
Original message
Pet Food Maker to Take Financial Responsibility for Pet Deaths From Poisoning
Source: ABC

The president of pet food maker Menu Foods, which last week issued a recall of 60 million cans and pouches of pet food after a rash of animal sickness and death, said today that the company would reimburse pet owners who can trace their pets' illnesses to the company's products.

Earlier today, New York State veterinary health investigators announced that the pet food responsible for pet deaths around the country was contaminated with the rodent poison aminopterin.

"A pet is an important part of any family," Paul Henderson, the president and CEO of Menu Foods, said at a Toronto press conference. "We understand what pet ownership is."

While Henderson described himself as "angry" over the massive recall and the impact it has had on hundreds of pets, he also said the company has not stopped manufacturing at the two plants believed to have produced the contaminated pet food.


Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=2975912&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. Start reporting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. They better start by more accurately reporting the extent of the problem
Namely, that it affects dry food too apparently and that the number of deaths is obviously well into the hundreds, and likely the thousands, based on what is being reported on line and by more reputable news sources than the corporate whores.

I love that they say they are gonna take financial responsibility as if it is an option. Corporate types kill me with their droll humor!

I think we should amend laws at the federal level to allow recovery of emotional distress due to the negligent death of a pet. That would do more for pet food quality control than some meaningless quality control law with three inspectors nationwide paid by the industry(imagining the likely Bushco 'solution'.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And some vets are skeptical that this poison is solely responsible
From the OP article:

Some veterinary experts say they are still skeptical as to whether the chemical is responsible for the kidney damage the pets endured.

"With the information that we have, none of us feel that this product fits the lesions we are seeing, but there may be information we don't know yet," said Lawrence McGill, a veterinary pathologist in Salt Lake City. "The feeling is that there are more questions than answers with this product."

"Renal failure is not the expected response to these drugs," said Susan Weinstein, executive director of the Massachusetts Veterinary Medical Association. She added that most rodent poisons work as severe anticoagulants — meaning they cause the rats that ingest them to bleed to death.

"Whether this particular toxin in this case can create renal failure depends on how this drug works in the body, which may be an entirely different pathway than the anticoagulants," Weinstein said. "Because we aren't yet familiar with this toxin, we can't be confident of the causation link."

Plus they haven't shutdown their plants - they are still manufacturing other pet foods that are not on recall list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rexcat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
32. It is not an anticoagulant but related to methotrexate...
which is one nasty chemotherapy agent, we use it for the treatment of some leukemias. Nice intro to the drug on Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aminopterin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
36. The info we have now indicates that the symptoms DO fit those expected
with aminopterin toxicity.

One interesting thing being bandied about is the possibility that some renal problems and nonregenerative anemias and low WBC counts that we have been seeing all along might be due to chronic low-level exposure to the toxin. This is disturbing. I occasionally see low WBCs that are not causing any actual illness, and I see occasional low-grade anemias that I can see no reason for. And who the hell knows what is causing the chronic renal failures that we all see in significant numbers?

IMHO this aminopterin exposure may have been going on a long time at much lower levels and we just didn't know it. How much of these more subtle problems are just normal levels to be expected, and how much is due to food-related toxin exposure?

We still have serious questions, some of which may NEVER be answered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nodehopper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. where did you read that it affects dry food?
That makes me concerned for my boyfriend's cat. Do you have a link or something I can send him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
34. Menu Foods doesn't make dry food
If the problem affects dry food too, you've just broadened the case significantly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. There is no reputable source saying that dry food is involved.
No vets are reporting anything more than the usual types of illness in pets NOT eating the recalled foods. Virtually every case of ARF being duscussed currently has a clear history of consuming recalled food.

This is internet rumormongering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mrspeeker Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
4. Getting Sued is what corporations call taking Financial Responsibility
Cause corporations only responsibility is their bottom line!

As far as actually responsible? Well I think we already know that answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gloria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. I called Iams yesterday and they are sending a refund check for the
cans of the Chicken and Gravy that I still had. Should be received in about 2-3 weeks.

Thank god my 3 didn't get sick. I only used it a few times as a "topping" on their usual California Natural kibble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. If they really understood the importance of "pets"
they wouldn't call it "pet ownership". "Pets" are family members, not property. I don't own my dogs any more than I own my parents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #6
16. So if your pet
wandered next door, and they took him in, you wouldn't go get him back? It would just be a lifestyle choice for your pet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. So if your child
wandered next door, and they took him in, you wouldn't go get him back? It would just be a lifestyle choice for your child?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. This happens after the NOV Elections. Are blue states affected?
Sorry to be so cynical, but has anyone thought about the timing of this horrendous act? Just when the Dems get back in power pets are sickened. Has anyone thought to check if blue states are mostly affected?

Does anyone know if pets in other countries are affected? Is it just the US or elsewhere?

Surely, if no other country has this problem then the US has been attacked somehow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's pure insanity.
Edited on Fri Mar-23-07 11:29 PM by Codeine
This was just one of those things. Mistakes happen when foods are processed at that scale.

>>Does anyone know if pets in other countries are affected? Is it just the US or elsewhere?

Presumably there are recalls in any country that imports pet food from Menu Foods. I'm sure at least Canada has been affected.

>>Surely, if no other country has this problem then the US has been attacked somehow.

OH NO!! Terrorists are after Fluffy! Give me a fuckin' break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pushycat Donating Member (401 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
27. You're so sure? Find 1 article outside the US with toxic pet food.
No reason to doubt me if you don't have evidence otherwise. I have the right to my own opinion even if you disapprove. The timing is suspicious - that's all. I looked all over for any article about pet food outside the States with toxin and found 0 (zero).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HuffleClaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
8. can you IMAGINE the tens of thousands who will try to cash in on this?
even people who never had a dog/cat in the first place?


maybe, just maybe some decent regulation of this industry will occur now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'm NEVER feeding my pets
"pet" food again! I'm giving the cats Chicken of the Sea tuna and my dog is getting Dinty Moore stew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Tuna isn't good for your cat at all.
And dogs probably shouldn't live on Dinty Moore.

And what happens when there is a problem with one of those products?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. THANKS
I guess I'm just so desperate to avoid the pet foods I haven't thought it thru enough. It's only a matter of time till human food is unfit to eat too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shaniqua6392 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. You can feed them both a raw healthy diet.
Check out this site to begin researching. We do it with our dogs and cats and it is really easy once you get the hang of it. It is just like shopping for another person at the grocery store. I know how you feel that you just want to feed them something human so you do not rely on companies who merely want to make billions selling us crap. But really try this out. You will be surprised. It is not expensive. It just takes a little more work and creativity.
http://www.barfworld.com/
www.petconnection.com To see an accurate count of the animal deaths that have been reported so far. Menu Foods bought wheat from CHINA to put in our pet food which was tainted with rat poison. They are just trying to hide the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. THANKS for the info nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Check out the other side of raw diets
I know there are a number of DU'ers who do so, but there's also warnings from vets it's dangerous because bacteria and other pathogens like e-coli, etc. that is in raw meat. I've read it could endanger those in the household and the animals poop will also contain the pathogens. After all it is from manure that e-coli gets spread.

My personal feeling is if I wouldn't eat raw meat because it has a very good chance of sickening me I'm sure not feeding it to my pet.

Just check both sides of the argument and then decide. In the past with a diabetic dog we did feed cooked chicken and liver instead of dog food.

And I came from a family who fed table scraps, gravy, bread that was getting stale mixed with dog kibble. Seems all the dogs lived to ripe old ages, had no coat problems, rarely saw a vet, never got sick, etc.

Of course I don't do that now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Thanks, I'm not so sure
either about a raw diet long long ago I had a Standard Poodle I got from a breeder who told me to feed her raw hamburger mixed with oatmeal. I tried but everytime I fed her raw hamburger she would throw it up, I ended up cooking the meat and she did better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirmensMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. There are also plenty of vets
who encourage raw diets for pets. One of them is my vet and I trust him completely. The previous vet, who tried to scare us out of feeding raw food, gave our cats up for dead when she couldn't find an answer to their digestive problems after 7 years of trying. They're happy and healthy two years later on a raw food diet. Of course, that's only one example (two if you count both cats), but it works for me. At least I know what's going into their food.

Your pet licks its butt and doesn't get sick. You wouldn't lick yours if you could, but you would get sick if you did so. Comparing people to animals just doesn't work.

Furthermore, it's common sense to wash your hands after you've handled either the raw food or animal poop ... whether the poop is from an animal that at raw food or commercially prepared food.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AirmensMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #14
30. I second that suggestion.
Raw food has done wonders for our kitties. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Yikes. Long-term, that would be almost as unhealthy for them as rat poison
Dinty Moore is loaded with sodium and cats need many more nutrients than a tuna diet can provide.

There are many pet foods that 1) haven't been involved in recalls, and 2) use quality ingredients, i.e. no fillers like corn and wheat and no nasties like meat by-products, etc.

Some brands to check into:

Merrick
Eagle Pack
Natural Balance
Felidae

There are many others. The site below has a list of quality foods. I haven't checked it for products made at Menu Foods, but it's a good starting point in your research:
http://www.dogaware.com/dogfeeding.html#commercial

Our pets depend on us to give them a healthy diet. We owe it to them to buy them the best. It's actually cheaper in the long run because they eat less (no useless fillers) and fewer vet bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. THANKS
for listing those brands. I'll give them a try...no more junk for my little companions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-23-07 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Reimburse pet owners for what......
the food purchased, or for enormous vet bills for sick animals? How about the animals that have died?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. I want my vet bills and replacement cost of another cat.
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 01:28 AM by saracat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Legal liability is limited to vet/medical costs, replacement of dead animals &/or
Edited on Sat Mar-24-07 12:29 PM by Divernan
refunding costs of their products. That's the legal precedent in cases such as someone caught traping or poisoning domestic pets, or running one down with a car. So if you got your pet at the local pound, you get whatever fee it costs to adopt another one. If you had a purebred animal, you can get back your costs in purchasing it. The law makes no allowance for pain and suffering of owners in watching their pets suffer and/or die, or for the pain and suffering of the animals. And that pain and suffering is the primary injury which pet owners are suffering. Now if some senior citizen has been eating that food, they could sue for pain and suffering in addition to medical care costs. The manufacturer might try the defense that the product was not meant for human consumption, but that defense could be knocked down because it's been known for decades that elderly poor eat cat food and I haven't noticed any labels on the food marked, "unfit for human consumption".

On edit: if you had a purebred animal which you were using for breeding purposes, you could claim lost profits for the breeding life of the animal. And since purebred kittens like Norwegian Forest Cats are going for up to $800 a kitten, that could be substantial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
18. See www.petconnection.com for comments by pet owners
This website has a blog, also links to veterinarians blogs, very helpful.

There have been thousands of pets sickened or killed by menu foods
dog food, the FDA has not done anything.

http://www.petconnection.com/blog/

None of my pets foods were on the list, but I am checking to
see where it was manufactured.

I think we have trusted the pet food industry too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. The Real Issue Is Consolidation
40-50 brands made by one manufacturer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #21
29. Yep. And the nonsense about one brand being better than another
The "premium" brands have basically committed fraud.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-25-07 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #29
33. No, they haven't
it's been explained to you before that simply coming from the same factory doesn't mean the products are equal.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillYourVoteBCounted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-24-07 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. Class Action Lawsuit Info here
here is a website collecting info for class action:

http://progressivelaw.ezsitelaunch.com/main.asp?id=11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC