Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Letter reveals U.S. intent at No Gun Ri

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:31 PM
Original message
Letter reveals U.S. intent at No Gun Ri
Source: Associated Press

Six years after declaring the U.S. killing of Korean War refugees at No Gun Ri was "not deliberate," the Army has acknowledged it found but did not divulge that a high-level document said the U.S. military had a policy of shooting approaching civilians in South Korea.

The document, a letter from the U.S. ambassador in South Korea to the State Department in Washington, is dated the day in 1950 when U.S. troops began the No Gun Ri shootings, in which survivors say hundreds, mostly women and children, were killed.

Exclusion of the embassy letter from the Army's 2001 investigative report is the most significant among numerous omissions of documents and testimony pointing to a policy of firing on refugee groups — undisclosed evidence uncovered by Associated Press archival research and Freedom of Information Act requests.

South Korean petitioners say hundreds more refugees died later in 1950 as a result of the U.S. practice. The Seoul government is investigating one such large-scale killing, of refugees stranded on a beach, newly confirmed via U.S. archives.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/shooting_refugees
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Jeez... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. Karma is Hell!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sutz12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-13-07 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. It keeps getting harder to maintain our facade of being the "Good Guys"
Edited on Fri Apr-13-07 11:38 PM by sutz12
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Sushi Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought you ment.. "no gun left behind"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Backlash from the right on media coverage of this incident a few years ago:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Gun_Ri

The AP editor of the story, J. Robert Port said he was demoted after championing the story for more than a year with AP higher-ups. The AP special assignment division, which Port headed, was dissolved. Port resigned in June 1999. In September 1999, seventeen months after the story was first found, the AP published the story. It is the AP's only Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting.<7>


Media controversy
An article in U.S. News & World Report, by military reporter Joseph L. Galloway, questioned the credibility of a key witness in the AP report.<3> Using the same Army records as those utilized by the AP, Galloway demonstrated fraudulent claims by Edward Daily. Edward Daily had said he saw both the killings at Nogeun-ri and an order to carry them out. The US News story found, based on army reports, that he was not a machine gunner, and he was not part of any unit at Nogeun-ri, nor anywhere near the village during the period in question. The AP initially stuck by Daily, who had reaffirmed his statements to numerous media outlets, including an appearance on a Dateline NBC interview with NBC anchor Tom Brokaw:

Tom Brokaw: You heard that order?
Edward Daily: Yes, sir.
Brokaw: "Kill them all?"
Edward Daily: Yes, sir.

However, after the expose by other journalism outlets, the AP reinterviewed Daily who, when confronted with army records which conflicted with his statements, admitted that he could not have been at the scene of the incident, and instead had heard of it second hand. Daily was a mechanic during the war and did not join the 2nd Battalion of the 7th Cavalry until 1951. In January 2002 he pled guilty to defrauding the government for collecting over $400,000 in benefits for combat-related trauma from combat he never saw, over nearly fifteen years. The AP's major American witness then served a 21 month sentence in Federal prison for his fraudulent accounts.<8>

- snip -

New York Times Reporter Felicity Barringer reported that Herman Patterson, a rifleman in the 2nd Battalion, said: "Unfortunately, the incident took place. Numbers are not known exactly." She also reviewed the conflicting news accounts of the events that transpired at Nogeun-ri, concluding that at that point (spring, 2000) "in the end, the crucial centerpiece of The A.P. report, the American soldiers killed at least 100 Korean civilians — possibly under direct orders — has been chipped but hardly shattered by the latest revelations."<9>

MORE:

American historian Sahr Conway-Lanz published an article in the January 2005 issue of Diplomatic History entitled "Beyond No Gun Ri," in which he argues that the position taken by the Pentagon after its 1999-2001 investigation--that the U.S. military did not order the refugees shot--is "untenable." In April 2006 he gave his own account of events in Collateral Damage: Americans, Noncombatant Immunity, and Atrocity after World War II, in which he published a letter by the United States ambassador to South Korea, John J. Muccio, which informed the State Department that U.S. troops had been authorized to shoot at refugees, referring to policy set down on July 25, 1950.

The Associated Press reporters who, in 1999, were the first to reveal the scope of the killings at Nogeun-ri, wrote, in an article May 29, 2006 in The Washington Post that the letter, which had not previously been known, "is the strongest indication yet that such a policy existed for all U.S. forces in Korea, and the first evidence that that policy was known to upper ranks of the U.S. government."<12>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. I posted this yesterday. Here's the letter...
Declassifying really helps clear things up!

PERSONAL-CONFIDENTIAL

The Foreign Service of the United States of America

American Embassy

July 26, 1950

Dear Dean: The refugee problem has developed aspects of a serious and even critical military nature, aside from the welfare aspects. Necessarily, decisions are being made by the military in regard to it, and in view of the possibility of repercussions in the United States from the effectuation of these decisions, I have thought it desirable to inform you of them.

The enemy has used the refugees to his advantage in many ways: by forcing them south and so clogging the roads as to interfere with military movements; by using them as a channel for infiltration of agents; and most dangerous of all by disguising their own troops as refugees, who after passing through our lines proceed, after dark, to produce hidden weapons, and then attack our units from the rear. Too often such attacks have been devastatingly successful. Such infiltrations had a considerable part in the defeat of the 24th Division at Taejon.

Naturally, the Army is determined to end this threat. Yesterday evening a meeting was arranged, by 8th Army HQ request, at the office of the Home Minister at the temporary Capitol. G-1, G-2, Provost Marshall, CIC, the Embassy, the Home and Social Affairs Ministries, and the Director National Police. The following decisions were made:

1. Leaflet drops will be made north of US lines banning the people not to proceed south, that they risk being fired upon if they do so. If refugees do appear from north of US lines they will receive warning shots, and if they then persist in advancing they will be shot.

2. Leaflet drops and oral warning by police within US combat zone will be made to the effect that no one can move south unless ordered, and then only under police control, that all movement of Korean civilians must end at sunset or those moving will risk being shot when dark comes.

3. Should the local tactical commander consider it essential to evacuate a given sector he will notify the police liaison officers attached to his HQ, who through the area Korean National Police will notify the inhabitants, and start them southward under police control on specified minor roads. No one will be permitted to move unless police notify them, and those further south not notified will be required to stay put.

4. Refugee groups must stop at sunset, and not move again until daylight. Police will establish check points to catch enemy agents; subsequently Social Ministry will be prepared to care for, and direct refugees to camps or other areas.

5. No mass movements unless police controlled will be permitted. Individual movements will be subject to police checks at numerous points.

6. In all cities, towns curfew will be at 9 p.m., with effective enforcement at 10 p.m. Any unauthorized person on streets after 10 p.m. is to be arrested, and carefully examined. The last item is already in effect.

Sincerely,

John J. Muccio
http://www.newsday.com/news/nationworld/wire/sns-ap-sho...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
8. Kick and Rec n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
9. Goodness gracious, we're still finding shit out about stuff that happened...
50 years ago? :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. Bush likes to talk about history's judgment
Usually prattling on about George Washington, and saying something along the lines that history is the ultimate judge, and historians are still analyzing Washington, and therefore we shouldn't be too hasty about condemning his disastrous policies.

I have a strong feeling that history's verdict on Simpleton W. Bush will be more No Gun Ri than Valley Forge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-14-07 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. They hate us for our freedom.....
Edited on Sat Apr-14-07 12:20 PM by bvar22
...our incredibility arrogant self-assumed freedom to indiscriminately kill civilians in their own countries without accountability or retribution.

What part of "Thou shalt not kill!" do we not understand?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC