|
Edited on Sat Apr-28-07 07:14 PM by LiberalEsto
That's just the way the Russian propaganda machine is spinning it. It's being moved to a Russian military cemetery where it will be re-erected. How does that qualify as a desecration.
Part of the reason it's being moved is because it had become a gathering spot not only for Russian nationalists, some of whom dressed in Red Army uniforms and sang the Russian national anthem (which is painfully hard for older Estonians to take after being ground under Russia's boot for 5 decades) but also for Estonian nationalists. There was concern that it would become a spot for confrontations between the two groups, and it was thought everyone would behave more civilly around the statue if it were in a solemn place like a cemetery. (Incidentally Russia in recent weeks has removed similar memorial statues in its own territory for various reasons, and local people have protested this.)
Second of all, in reference to how I would like it if the French "desecrated a monument to U.S. soldiers" -- the US hasn't ever enslaved France, killed or shipped a large number of its people to labor camps in Siberia, taken over the entire country by brutal force, forced the French to speak English and their children to attend school only in English, forbidden them to attend churches, prohibited them from overseas travel or news from democratic countries, banned the French national anthem and flag, taken over French homes and farms, and shipped over hundreds of thousands of Americans to take all the good land and all the good jobs. All the while, these occupying Americans would be refusing to learn so much as a word of French, and treating the native French like dirt.
And then, when "generously" letting the French taste freedom after 50 years of occupation, leaving behind hundreds of thousands of Americans who continue to live there refusing to learn French or recognize that they are no longer the overlords. Oh, and let's not forget, if these remaining Americans don't like the way they are treated by the newly free French (who might understandably be bitter after 50 years of mistreatment) they whine to the U.S., which threatens military force against France for not coddling the Americans there. And every one of those remaining Americans in France could easily become a citizen if they just exerted themselves to attain a very small working knowledge of the French language,
As for my "republicanism," here's my voting record: 1972 George McGovern; 1976 campaigned for Fred Harris in primary, voted for Carter; 1980, campaigned and voted for Barry Commoner as a member of the Citizens Party because I felt Democrats were too pro-corporation; 1984, campaigned and voted for Sonia Johnson of the Citizens Party; 1988, campaigned for Jesse Jackson but ended up voting for Dukakis; 1992, originally halfheartedly supported Jerry Brown, then campaigned and voted for Clinton; 1996 halfheartedly supported Clinton (concerned because he was too corporate and middle of the road); 2000, campaigned and voted for Gore; 2004, supported and campaigned for Kucinich in primary but wound up campaigning and voting for Kerry.
If that's the voting record of a "republican," I fail to see how.
I wonder why I'm bothering to even respond to your comments, because I'm sure you won't make any effort to understand a viewpoint other than your own.
You are bound and determined to think that "eSStonians" are all Nazis, right? Well, let me tell you that my father, a socialist, had to flee from Estonia when the Nazis occupied the country in 1941, because there was a price on his head. He HATED the Nazis, and also he hated the Stalinists who were evil murdering swine, who massacred Estonians, Latvians, Lithuanians, Polish, Ukrainians and people of other ethnic groups, and who murdered Russians by the tens or hundreds of thousands.
|