Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Residency Clause Adds Fuel To Dispute Over U.S. Attorneys

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 12:34 AM
Original message
Residency Clause Adds Fuel To Dispute Over U.S. Attorneys
Source: Washington Post

One Prosecutor Gets an Exemption, Another Gets Fired
On Nov. 10, 2005, Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales sent a letter to a federal judge in Montana, assuring him that the U.S. attorney there, William W. Mercer, was not violating federal law by spending most of his time in Washington as a senior Justice Department official.

That same day, Mercer had a GOP Senate staffer insert into a bill a provision that would change the rules so that federal prosecutors could live outside their districts to serve in other jobs, according to documents and interviews

Congress passed the provision several months later as part of the USA Patriot Act reauthorization bill, retroactively benefiting Mercer and a handful of other senior Justice officials who pull double duty as U.S. attorneys and headquarters officials. Justice officials say the measure was a necessary clarification to ensure that prosecutors could fill temporary postings in Washington, Iraq and elsewhere, and that it also applies to assistant U.S. attorneys.

But the episode, which received little notice at the time, provides another example in which Gonzales's statements appear to conflict with simultaneous actions by his aides in connection with U.S. attorney policies. Lawmakers investigating the department's handling of the dismissal of eight U.S. attorneys have repeatedly accused Gonzales of being less than truthful about the roles played by himself and the White House.



Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/01/AR2007050101961.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 05:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. so the Patriot Act says a USA can live outside... "to serve other jobs"
er - how does having a US Attorney serve other jobs than being a US Attorney make us "more safe" which is the purported reason for the Patriot Act in the first place? It is all such a sham.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 06:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Creative way to build up a big staff at headquarters, huh salin?
Guess it took a lot of coordination in DC to take all those calls from the White House. And they were probably needed to help push important legislation like a ban on gay marriage and the 'Save Terry Schiavo' bill.

Too bad those states had to do without attorneys they were supposed to have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Good description per why they were "needed" in DC
don't we all feel "safer" now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-02-07 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
4. whistle blower, Jesselyn Radack's diary here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingyouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Residency Clause Adds Fuel To Dispute Over U.S. Attorneys
Source: Washington Post

...

At issue in the dispute over Mercer were residency requirements for U.S. attorneys. Mercer has been largely absent from Montana while working as a senior aide to Gonzales for the past two years, a situation that has drawn the ire of U.S. District Chief Judge Donald W. Molloy of Billings.

Molloy wrote to Gonzales on Oct. 20, 2005, that Mercer was violating federal law because he "no longer resides in Montana" and was living with his family in the Washington area.

Three weeks later, on Nov. 10, Gonzales responded to Molloy that Mercer "is in compliance with the residency requirement" under federal law because he "is domiciled there, returns there on a regular basis, and will live there full-time as soon as his temporary assignment is completed."

On the same day back in Washington, the new legislation was added to the Patriot bill at the request of Mercer, who had been assigned the task of shepherding the provision through Congress, according to congressional aides and new statements from one of Mercer's colleagues.

...

Read more: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/01/AR2007050101961.html?hpid=topnews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. One of the complaints against Iglesias in New Mexico
Curiously, one of the complaints the AG's office made against David Iglesias in New Mexico was that he would miss one month out of the office each year due to his National Guard obligation. Seems that what was bad for New Mexico is hunky and dory for Montana. Weird, huh? It almost seems hypocritical or bogus, doesn't it? But since George W. Bush is a church-goin' God-fearin' man, we know that can't be right. So it remains just . . . weird, I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. just slip a provison into the PA------you have to wonder what the heck else
in there for the benefit of Justice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimDandy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-03-07 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. The taxpayers are getting gipped!
There is no way that William W. Mercer could have been performing his job as U.S. Attorney for Montana, if he was living out-of-state with his family and WORKING AT ANOTHER JOB, FULL-TIME, FOR TWO YEARS!

And why didn't Gonzales just appoint another person as Montana's U.S. Attorney? What, Montana doesn't deserve any justice from the Bush administration? (Pun intended :D )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC