Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rapist to be castrated

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:53 AM
Original message
Rapist to be castrated
Source: Panama City (FL) News Herald

September 11, 2007
By David Angier
News Herald Writer

Bobby James Allen pleaded guilty Monday to several rapes and agreed to be castrated as a part of his plea agreement.

The procedure, the first of its kind in a Florida criminal case according to the State Attorney’s Office, has to be done within the next eight days. The earliest it could be done is today.

“You understand that this procedure is the removal of your testicles?” Circuit Judge Michael Overstreet asked.

Read more: http://www.newsherald.com/headlines/article.display.php?a=3323
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sukie1941 Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. He can still have intercourse
Castration is not a great fix for rapists.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soothsayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. hmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
3. The procedure would cause "a decline in sexual interest and erection problems,"
the article says. What it doesn't say is what, if any, psychiatric treatment and behavior modification therapy he'll get during his 15 to 20 years (he's already served five of the maximum 20 to 25 sentence) in prison.

What this guy has done is reprehensible, but I don't think we do ourselves any favors if we pretend that castration without psychiatric treatment will "fix" this guy or protect any of us once he's released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:03 AM
Original message
I'm not convinced the compulsion is
linked to his masculine hormones.

He certainly doesn't need a usable penis to sexually abuse someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Exactly. I wonder how much of this castration sentence is just to make US feel safer,
in the (all too often) absence of effective psychiatric treatment. From the photo, he looks young enough to still be physically capable of violence with a weapon other than his penis once he's released.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
21. It will help to some degree
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 10:40 AM by midlife_mo_Jo
He gets excited by VIOLENCE like rape. It's a sick and evil perversion. He's just not going to get as excited without all those hormones. For some, it might be enough to stop the violence, but I'm not convinced it's enough for all or even most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
67. I agree. Rape isn't at bottom about sex, but about power
and violence.

You don't need even a functioning penis to rape someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
12. The man who raped me already had erection problems, but he still raped me.
He kept losing his erection, and I realized at one point that I had to let his ego off the hook to get him away from me. I made some comment when he was frustrated and exhausted as though he had just ejaculated. He got off and left me after that and a few threats of violence against me.

I don't see this as the best fix, and possibly may only cause the rapist to need additional stimulation, such as through violence and humiliation, to follow through. He needs alot more than castration.

It was 20 years ago, and I have recovered well, thanks in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. I may be wrong, but if my memory serves me
(I worked in a prison a few years back... well, quite a few years back) that if he's in a PRISON, he has therapy available to him (and participating will help him in terms of parole, work-release, etc) but that his punishment is to be in prison and beyond that he is not required to participate in any services available to him while in prison.

Of course, that's my state. It may not be all states.

If he were incarcerated into a mental hosptial, that'd be a different story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #13
49. Probably so, but the statistics on repeat offenses by sex offenders are pretty grim
Therapy doesn't help most of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #49
81. Wrong
only murder and DUI have a lower recidivism rate than "sex offenders" and "rapists".

Highlights include the following:

* Released prisoners with the highest rearrest rates were robbers (70.2%), burglars (74.0%), larcenists (74.6%), motor vehicle thieves (78.8%), those in prison for possessing or selling stolen property (77.4%), and those in prison for possessing, using, or selling illegal weapons (70.2%).
* Within 3 years, 2.5% of released rapists were arrested for another rape, and 1.2% of those who had served time for homicide were arrested for homicide.
* Released prisoners with the LOWEST rearrest rates were those in prison for homicide (40.7%),
rape (46.0%), other sexual assault (41.4%), and driving under the influence (51.5%).
* The 272,111 offenders discharged in 1994 had accumulated 4.1 million arrest charges before their most recent imprisonment and another 744,000 charges within 3 years of release.


http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/abstract/rpr94.htm

The numbers are probably better now since a few systems are actually doing a little therapy now, not enough but some...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #81
88. Do you consider a 40+% recidivism rate acceptable?
Does that really sound like a low number to you?

Does the fact that murderers have a lower recidivism rate in any way contradict what I posted?

All of those statistics look pretty grim to me.

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #88
92. "Therapy doesn't help most of them." There, I found a contradiction for you.
Edited on Wed Sep-12-07 04:38 PM by jpgray
Shifting your ground to whether any percentage of rearrest is acceptable isn't a very honest debate tactic. Note only 2.5% of rapists were arrested -for another rape- within three years. That isn't acceptable either, but it is indicative that the behavior can be heavily curbed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #92
93. Heavily curbed isn't good enough for the victims of abusers who aren't "cured"
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jojo54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
4. It's not the LITTLE head that needs fixing! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. Exactly! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
82. Probably true
and in this egregiously brutal, vengeance oriented criminal-injustice system we have in the U.S. -- probably won't get it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
sabbat hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. rape isnt about sex
it is about violence in which sex is the weapon.

Will the castration stop this person from committing other acts of violence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. You took the words right out of my mind...
Castration will probably only serve to reinforce his already warped idea of sex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. we have a winner!
you're absolutely right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PianoBlack Donating Member (104 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
15. I agree....
I honestly believe all rapists should be imprisoned for life. If not then they should be killed. I don't usually support the death penalty...but they deserve it's a crime that is not only physically painful but emotionally damaging far above and beyond that of any physical damage. It is unforgivable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
48. this guy is an armed robber, so yes, it isn't about sex
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 03:52 PM by pitohui
armed robbers are willing to kill you to take some pieces of paper in your purse, so they don't see anything wrong w. a little rape, why would they? the rape in these cases is often just a matter of opportunity and whim

i think if he ever gets out, he will still steal, but maybe there is some chance the hormonal effects will decrease his desire to also molest the women he robs so the whim to hang around and assault his victims might not occur

it would be better if the dude was removed from the planet if you asked me, but no one did ask...judge apparently asked the victims if they'd be satisfied with the deal

25 years (well, 20, since 5 are already served) plus 10 years with an ankle monitor is not exactly a sweetheart deal -- and that's what he's getting IF he does the procedure

obviously a nasty, nasty excuse for a human being

i don't think we have to worry about making him angrier, he's already a sick predator who would kill you for the TV set on your wall...

he should be glad i'm not the judge, he'd never get out

the only reason i don't support death penalty for rape is because it leaves the rapist w. no reason to ever leave a victim alive -- he might as well kill the victim when he's done -- remember, we're talking about scum who will put a gun in your face over a freaking handbag
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
8. Oh my god... he's going to become a Democratic congressman? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdelaguna2000 Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dbt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
10. Ask Mike Huckabee about such procedures,
n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
16. Disgusting, absolutely revolting, that in this...
century we are reverting to the kind of ignorance we had a hundred years ago about how the human body works and the torturous things we do to it to try to get it to work the way aome think it should.

Castration will help neither this person nor his potential victims.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. A 21st century counter to 20th century lobotomies ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
27. Amen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tight_rope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #16
54. I SOOO AGREE!
It's not about his damn penis. Rape is about power and control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
68. You're right. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:22 AM
Response to Original message
17. You don't need body parts to rape someone
it's about violence, not sex. If he wants to hurt someone, he will find a way to do it. There are tools he can use. Having his balls removed is unlikely to stop him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WileEcoyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. My daughter has a simple method of dealing with attackers
Avoidance is best. Especially those acquaintances and former dates who won't knock it off and keep coming around.

She carries pepper spray, but more important than that:

If she runs into someone whom she can't get rid of she simply calls her father.

End of story. Quick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
37. Self-delete. Posted in wrong thread
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 01:29 PM by RebelOne
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
50. um, this was an armed robber who raped victims, not a stalker
i don't think the armed robber will let you call daddy in the middle of the home invasion

i don't blame victims of rape for not calling daddy, i blame the damn rapist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WileEcoyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #50
78. No one was saying that.
The point is having existing family resources to count on. As well as education to the danger and awareness. Can't make a perfect defense but it improves the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
20. This is a barbaric and reprehensible punishment.
Apparently there is little separating the US legal processes from those of a Sharia state. I want to know the ethnicity of the condemned person. I think it's potentially relevant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. I thought choice was a good thing
He doesn't have to be castrated. He has the option of taking a longer prison sentence.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #26
33. That is not relevant.
This is not a medically recognized treatment. I'm sure Saudi Arabia could say to an accused thief: "We'll chop off your right arm, but it's your choice: we could also kill you instead." I see little difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. I view it as a punishment option, not a treatment in any way
I can't muster up any sympathy for the dude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. You think this is a deterrent then? Or it's just that punishing feels good?
What is the policy motivation for genital mutilation by law enforcement authorities?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. I have no opinion as to its deterrant effect or how others might feel about punishment
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 02:49 PM by slackmaster
In case you are wondering about my opinion of providing an option to have body parts removed in exchange for a shorter prison term, I think it's bizarre and possibly unconstitutional (i.e. unusual punishment if not cruel).

What is the policy motivation for genital mutilation by law enforcement authorities?

I'm not sure what's going on in their heads (or yours or anyone else's). My best guess is that they subscribe to the questionable notion that castration necessarily reduces the likelihood that a male sex offender will offend again in the future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #26
56. Go figure that you'd be in favor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:45 PM
Response to Reply #56
59. Please read replies #40 and #29
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 04:47 PM by slackmaster
If you are actually interested in my opinion of the use of castration as punishment.

My point, which evidently sailed right over your head, was that many of the initial replies are knee-jerk reactions by readers who seem to think the castration was directed by the court as the only punishment option for the convict.

It's a real shame how often people on this board go off half-cocked without actually reading the material, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moochy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #59
61. Thanks, I stand corrected.
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 04:49 PM by Moochy
And I stand corrected, I am guilty of skimming. I think its pretty clear that it should be unconstitutional, and its a reflection of the shitty state of that court that they would even entertain such a medieval sentencing option. But I suppose torture, maiming and now defenstration is part of the culture and it flows from the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Caucasian
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #31
84. If he were black he would'a gotten life without -- no doubt (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
39. Welcome to the United States of
Saudi Arabia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
51. the ethnicity is white
i assume if he were black, he would be automatically imprisoned for life instead of getting this "deal" which does allow for him to be released in 20 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
22. Great, because there's nothing more harmless than an angry,
sexually frustrated man who enjoys injuring and humiliating women. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuJun Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
23. Take it All!
Disarm the pig!! Amputation of the penis and testicles would be more effective and appropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
24. Castration isn't just about sex people.
Testosterone levels drive aggression, some types of euphoria, and have been linked to some forms of psychosis. They drive male sexual energies, and lead to increased risk-taking behavior. Castration helps to remove all of that. It reduces desire, period. It's true that a castrated rapist may still have contempt for women, but the process helps to remove the will to do anything about it. He will not be sexually frustrated, because he won't be sexually anything.

If the guy opted for it, I have no problem with the concept. I oppose forced castrations, but in cases where the criminal elects to have it done and the persons history indicates a track record of violent sexual tendencies, I'm all for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoddessOfGuinness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #24
69. Also, it wouldn't need to be done surgically...
Chemical castration with Depo-Provera can effectively reduce testosterone. Combined with counseling therapy, I would think this a viable, more humane alternative to prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
70. I also think it's a great idea. Castration would lower his
testosterone. Without testosterone, he is less likely to be violent. And if he wants it done, I see no problem with it whatsoever.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2beToby Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
71. If this were 100% true
then every MTF transsexual out there would lose their sex drive permanently. This is simply not the case. A lot of sexual feelings can be in the mind, and castration as an adult will not just make sexual desire go away. Reduce, sure, but not enough to absolutely stop him from wanting to have sex.

Although decreasing the testosterone can help, that is very iffy science. Why can most men have t levels at 500ng/dl (average) and be normal men when other men have that amount and are rapists? Testosterone isn't all about aggression. About 1/3 of women have increased t levels as well, and there isn't a significant number of those raised t level women being violent even though they may not be much longer than low t level men.

Especially because rape is about control and power, castration may actually cause MORE problems in these rapists. Without loads of therapy on top of it imagine the control issues that would spring up, whether they ask for it or not. I'm not a rapist sympathizer, but I don't want them coming out and causing a different problem either. Say, animal torturing.

To go further, but completely my own speculation here, I think castration is akin to treating a symptom instead of the cause of an illness. It's the brain that's needs help. Plus, not everything can be cured. Rapists have nearly a 98% recidivism rate--I'm sorry, but that's too high of a chance for me, my family and my loved ones. Until we have a bulletproof (at least 50% effective) therapy process and medicine, or some such thing, rapists need to stay where they don't have the chance to hurt someone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. MTF transsexuals usually take female hormones.
And there are no guarantees in life. Nothing is bulletproof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2beToby Donating Member (151 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #72
91. Yes but Estrogen has also been
shown to decrease libido.

Bulletproof no, but if there isn't a treatment that's at least 50% effect we should really consider keeping rapists out of the public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. Next, we can start cutting off the hands of thieves!
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 12:04 PM by Tesha
And the tongues of people who speak treason against
the government.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
28. The tempest in this teapot would be a lot more impressive if the guy had no choice
Anyone who hasn't read the article should do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. It seems that his choice
is evidence of his lack of sanity.
I'd bet this was offered to him as an option and not just some out-of-the blue request.
It's shocking to me that a judge and a prosecutor signed off on it.
Folks in Bay County are a bit eccentric, but this takes the cake, so to speak.
He still has to do 25 years in prison as a gelded child rapist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. Great... just... fucking... great...
Now that he doesn't have Rape as part of his criminal arsenal, he has to resort to Murder.

Nice choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #29
42. If they simply kept him in prison he wouldn't have either option
At least not against the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #42
85. But they CAN'T keep him in prison
There are at least fifty people who were busted with two joints in their possession who are waiting for this rapist's bed.

This is what we're going to do, we of the truly civilized United States of America. We're going to cut this guy's balls off and turn him loose upon the world. When he gets around to murdering nine or ten women because he can't rape them anymore, we'll sentence him to death and put him in his own special cage. And in the meantime, all those guys who got caught with a lid of ditch weed and a Pink Floyd record (the only suitable surface for cleaning weed) will have somewhere to stay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
qb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
30. Isn't the state opening itself up to an expensive lawsuit?
What if he sues, claiming he wasn't of sound mind... wasn't properly informed... was coerced...

Lock him up for life. Period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
militaryspouse Donating Member (198 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. ..
'"Testosterone levels drive aggression, some types of euphoria, and have been linked to some forms of psychosis. They drive male sexual energies, and lead to increased risk-taking behavior. Castration helps to remove all of that"'

Tha was the very same reason my vet said I should have my dog neutered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelOne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
38. Some Scandinavian countries castrate repeat offenders.
It's been an ongoing practice for a long time. Just Google "Scandinavian countries and castration." There's a lot of info on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
41. Bloody Vikings
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #38
44. Does it work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:05 PM
Original message
aka total avoidance of the underlying issue
as if one needed an erect penis to sexually assault someone. In 25 years, he'll be a free man again, with a whole new laundry list of control issues to work out. What then?

What are they doing to neuter Bobby James Allen's urge to forcefully control others? That's what I'd like to see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
64. You don't need an erection to assault someone
but it tends to be the case that the act of rape - an act of violence against women - gets this guy excited. (I feel filthy typing this.) Once he loses so much testosterone, he will have far fewer sexual feelings of any kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
43. Fair enough.
Though I think death would be more appropriate and preferable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #43
46. Of course you think that, MrSlayer. It's your job.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #46
63. I wish someone would pay me for it then.
I have to stop giving it away for free.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
45. Maybe it will help keep him from future rapes ...
He consented or chose castration, though it is troubling that it required a criminal case, for women to first be victimized, and a judge to offer it in exchange for a reduced sentence.



The critical question in this literature concerns whether testosterone violence relationships are causal. Little doubt exists that castration decreases aggression in animals and administration of testosterone increases aggression. Few experimental studies have been conducted in humans, but there is nevertheless evidence of a causal relationship. Olweus et al. (1988) assessed their finding of higher testosterone in male adolescents with high levels of self-report aggression using path analysis and concluded that testosterone had causal effects on both provoked and unprovoked aggressive behavior. One study that comes close to such an ideal experiment is that of Wille and Beier (1989), who showed that ninety-nine castrated German sex offenders had a significantly lower recidivism rate eleven years postrelease (3 percent) compared to thirtyfive non castrated sex offenders (46 percent). There is in addition some limited evidence that less drastic methods of reducing testosterone levels such as administration of anti-androgens and progesterone derivatives have some effect in lowering violence and sexual aggression (Rubin 1987; Brain 1990; Archer 1991). One double-blind, crossover hormone replacement study administered testosterone to male adolescents with delayed puberty and found that medium doses increased aggressive behavior twenty-one months later (Susman and Ponirakis, 1997). It could be argued that extreme alterations in testosterone are not a good model for the less severe variability found in the general population, and that moderate changes of this hormone do not significantly influence aggression. On the other hand, Loosen, Purdon, and Pavlou (1994) found that mild reductions in testosterone in men were associated with reductions in outwardly directed anger, thus suggesting that mild changes in testosterone can modulate aggression.

Testosterone levels are in part heritable (Turner et al. 1986), and it is conceivable that the genetic predisposition to crime may in part be expressed through the hormonal system. On the other hand, it is also known that environmental influences such as success in competition, the perception of winning, exposure to erotic films, and social dominance can increase circulating levels of testosterone (Brain 1990; Archer 1991). Clearly, links between testosterone and aggression are complex, and simplistic explanations of this link are probably incorrect. By the same token, it would be equally erroneous to discount the evidence for the role of hormones in influencing aggression merely because hormones are influenced by the environment. In this context, theoretical perspectives should take into account reciprocal influences between behavior and aggression and the roles hormones play in the regulation of arousal (Susman et al. 1996).

http://www-rcf.usc.edu/~raine/BiologicalBasisCrime.pdf




Rape appears to be part of a dominance society that evolved following the neolithic period, and seems related to suppression of women. For a an example of a culture that has held onto its culture of cooperation, see the Piaroa, they consider competition (the social root of dominance) as a spiritual evil. I guess it's nice that some humans have been able to maintain their peaceful culture.

Modern society uses drugs and the War on Drugs (testosterone in this case) to find its peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
47. I didn't even have to read the link to know it came from Florida- or Texas or Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #47
52. well they say it was the first time such a deal offered in florida
so call me naive but i did have to read the link

i don't think these deals are commonly offered, sounds like in the normal course of events he would have been put away forever without any chance of parole

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #52
57. I guess it's all the wierd things
Like prosecuting very young kids- and putting locking them up decades. I hear so many whack stories coming from these 3 states- that nothing really surprises me there.

The thing to worry about here is the practice spreading- and prosecutors overcharging or holding long prison sentences over people's heads if they decline to be mutilated, sterilized or some other such thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
superconnected Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
53. I have to check my calendar... it says 2007 not 1007... or just 7
Now either the article or my calendar is off...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Your calendar is OK
It has to do with your GPS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretty_lies Donating Member (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
60. You're All Grossly Misinformed. Castration Is Humane And Highly Effective.
Castration cuts reoffending rates by nearly EIGHTY PER CENT. It's painless and undetectable (just use Neuticles(TM)).

Sending people to jail and torture for 20 years for sexual compulsions they can't control, to be certain they'll reoffend once they get out - now THAT is cruelty.



http://users.ipfw.edu/ruflethe/helpforsexoffenders.htm

Most of the arguments against voluntary castration are based on misconceptions, such as the common belief that it is a barbaric practice that has been used only in Third World countries.

The fact is that it has been effectively and humanely used as treatment in Denmark, Czechoslovakia, Holland, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Sweden, and Finland.

A 1973 Swiss study of a hundred twenty-one castrated offenders found that the rate of reoffending dropped to 4.1 per cent, compared with 76.9 per cent before the operation.

A Danish study in the sixties which followed as many as nine hundred castrated sex offenders, found that recidivism rates dropped to 2.2 per cent.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #60
65. Ahhhh, some facts!
Thanks for that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riskpeace Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #60
76. He still has to do twenty years
And going to a Florida state prison as a castrated, breast-growing, child rapist is basically a life sentence.
He won't last 2 years alive in that prison much less 20.
Compassion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #76
80. He agreed to it.
He was also warned about the side effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BreweryYardRat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
62. I don't like this.
Chemical castration is okay with me, because so far as I know, it's not permanent.

But this?

What's to stop some jackass DA from browbeating an innocent man (probably black/brown, given the way the Florida injustice system works) into confessing to a guilty plea including castration?

Or some of our legislators adjusting the law to make it mandatory, not something that could be agreed on in exchange for a lighter sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midlife_mo_Jo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #62
66. It's certainly a concern
but I think it could be used judiciously with repeat offenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
73. testicals have not much to do with it.. what a con job
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #73
74. Oh right.
Edited on Tue Sep-11-07 08:17 PM by lizzy
Then why do dogs and cats get neutered?
If testicles have nothing to do with it, that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Stranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 08:19 PM
Response to Original message
75. Unconstitutional.
"nor shall cruel and unusual punishments be inflicted . . . "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bamacrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
77. I wonder how they would do it?
Would it be chemical or would they just lop them off(:puke:). I wonder if he would get testosterone treatments to deal with the menopausal symptoms and man boobs? I'm sure most women would find this punishment acceptable. Hahaha

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. Sounds like it will be surgical castration.
As for testosterone treatments, I doubt it, considering the goal of castration is to lower testosterone. I am not sure why the guy agreed to do it, but hey, if he wants to do it,why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-11-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
83. Funny how these kinds of threads
bring out the worst of the bloodthirsty sick individuals here on DU.

-------

Kill Him INSTEAD! they scream in their self-righteous fog...

Cut it ALL off! they cackle in their mindless rage...

Lock 'em all up forever! they gurgle in their ignorance...

He deserves to be DEAD and off the planet! they yell in their sick rage...

-------

These threads always bring out the worst of the worst...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FuJun Donating Member (79 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #83
89. Listen to you!
"bring out the worst of the bloodthirsty sick individuals here on DU.

-------

Kill Him INSTEAD! they scream in their self-righteous fog...

Cut it ALL off! they cackle in their mindless rage...

Lock 'em all up forever! they gurgle in their ignorance...

He deserves to be DEAD and off the planet! they yell in their sick rage...

-------

These threads always bring out the worst of the worst..."

I suggest you check that self-righteous tone. You did after all threaten to physically assault any CCW holder that may cross your path. You show more sympathy for a rapist? Well then, what is your solution?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudDad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #89
95. I've already posted my solutions to the abysmal
failure of the criminal-injustice system.

Use the Search Function, newbie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
colorado_ufo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
86. This is a multiple rapist who committed these acts during armed robbery.
The assh_le could have KILLED someone. He raped a kid on Christmas morning during another armed robbery. He confessed to the crimes without coercion. He is fortunate that 1) the legal system does not offer the death penalty for this and 2) that one of his victims' relatives or friends did not manage to kill HIM during the commission of his crimes.

Castration, in a situation such as this, is justified, especially when it is offered as a choice. It needs to be combined with prison time. Safety of the innocent public is of higher concern than this individual's rights. Testosterone not only drives male sexuality, it also contributes toward aggression and violence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crayson Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
87. Implant him with prostethic dog testicle

Or what was that product for castrated dogs which was about "giving them more self esteem" ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
90. That's the way the ball bounces...
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ismnotwasm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-12-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
94. If I remember correctly
(I don't have time to look it up)

This doesn't work for sex offenders. Hormones are tricky things, and are produced in surprising parts of the body. He may lose the ability to have an erection, but will not be able to control the thoughts that led him to his behavior.
As much as I despise sex offenders, I don't believe this is any kind of answer and could lead to a dangerous precedent. What's wrong with putting him in jail for 40 years? His testosterone levels will drop naturally. Again, it won't treat the underlying dysfunction that makes him who he is, but I don't like the idea of sex sanctioned mutilation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-13-07 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #94
96. What evidence do you have that it doesn't work with sex offenders?
Edited on Thu Sep-13-07 08:29 PM by lizzy
All of you people claiming this-do you have anything at all to back it up?
It appears that castration studies are being done in Europe with what appear to be good results.
So, what are you basing your claims on?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC