Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Embattled governor says he has no intention of resigning;

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:21 PM
Original message
Embattled governor says he has no intention of resigning;
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2004/01/06/national1254EST0596.DTL

Gov. John G. Rowland, under pressure because of corruption allegations, told legislative leaders Tuesday he has no intention of resigning, lawmakers said.

House Speaker Moira Lyons said the 90-minute meeting with the governor was "serious and candid." She and House Majority leader Jim Amann plan to meet with fellow House Democrats on Thursday before deciding whether to pursue the impeachment of the Republican governor.

"We will get a consensus from the caucus and as their leader along with the speaker, we'll make a decision of whether it goes to impeachment, or whether we sit back and wait for indictments," Amann said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. But he speaks with God!
Or at least, he says that he does. Therefore, he is unimpeachable, a Christian patriot and a credit to the great state of Connecticut.

What a hypocritical buffoon!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. I wonder...
What would've happened had the good Governor had a little (D) next to his name instead of the little (R)?:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidinalameda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. his ass would have been in jail by now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good grief. Just impeach the guy and get it over with! (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Throckmorton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Only problem is no one knows how.
In the 180 year history of the current Connecticut State Constitution no state offical or Judge has ever been inpeached. The wording of Article Nine is not much help either, note that other than treason it doesn't mention what someone can be impeached for.

ARTICLE NINTH.

OF IMPEACHMENTS.

SEC. 1. The house of representatives shall have the sole power of impeaching.

SEC. 2. All impeachments shall be tried by the senate. When sitting for that purpose, they shall be on oath or affirmation. No person shall be convicted without the concurrence of at least two-thirds of the members present. When the governor is impeached, the chief justice shall preside.

SEC. 3. The governor, and all other executive and judicial officers, shall be liable to impeachment; but judgments in such cases shall not extend further than to removal from office, and disqualification to hold any office of honor, trust or profit under the state. The party convicted, shall, nevertheless, be liable and subject to indictment, trial and punishment according to law.

SEC. 4. Treason against the state shall consist only in levying war against it, or adhering to its enemies, giving them aid and comfort. No person shall be convicted of treason, unless on the testimony of at least two witnesses to the same overt act, or on confession in open court. No conviction of treason, or attainder, shall work corruption of blood, or forfeiture.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-06-04 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The way seems clear
Edited on Tue Jan-06-04 03:42 PM by yellowcanine
It sounds if the Conn. constitution leaves it up to the house members to define what is impeachable and up to the senate to decide whether the impeached person is guilty. What is hard about that? Impeachment is always a judgement call, whether or not actual causes for impeachment are defined. What does "high crimes and misdemeanors" mean anyway? Ultimately the elected representatives will have to defend any impeachment or nonimpeachment to the voters - which is as it should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC