Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chavez says Colombia rebels in Venezuela for talks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 05:52 AM
Original message
Chavez says Colombia rebels in Venezuela for talks
Source: Reuters

Chavez says Colombia rebels in Venezuela for talks
Sun Nov 4, 2007 8:31pm EST

CARACAS (Reuters) - Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said rebels from neighboring Colombia had entered the country for talks that could start as early as Sunday night on freeing hostages, including three American men and a French woman.

Colombian President Alvaro Uribe has asked Chavez to mediate with the Marxist guerrillas from Latin America's oldest insurgency, the FARC, to break an impasse in negotiations meant to win the release of the group's most high-profile captives.

"I should be seeing them," Chavez said at a political rally. "I do not know if it will be tonight, tomorrow or the day after."

Chavez, South America's leading leftist voice, has credibility with the rebels but it is unclear if he can overcome obstacles to the accord such as Uribe's refusal to meet the FARC demand for a demilitarized area, analysts say.



Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSN0421198120071105?rpc=401&
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rjones2818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. It'll be interesting how this will be spun
by the corporate media, no matter how it turns out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rAVES Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 06:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Chavez negotiates with Terrorists"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. You can count on EVERY article containing, first and foremost, the "recitation of grievances."
By now you note they all reiterate Chavez recognizes and admires Fidel Castro, Chavez is a Socialist, Chavez is going to be able to run for re-election until the population doesn't want him around, Chavez has called (although they never mention it was laughingly) Bush the "Devil," and that Chavez led a coup against a former Venezuelan President (Carlos Andres Perez)(and they NEVER admit that President had his military fire into crowds of poor people protesting his increase of their transportation costs beyond their ability to pay, and that that same President (Carlos Andres Perez) was later impeached, and jailed, and that he, Chavez, was later pardoned by another Venezuelan President after serving time in jail.).

Every article has at least 2 or 3 of these "grievances" they drag out BEFORE they feel relaxed enough to write anything else. Do they think we're ####ing going to FORGET, with them telling us in EVERY ####ing article? Sheesh!

Chavez doesn't even coddle death squads, like Bush's little demon friend, Alvaro Uribe, in Colombia, who is arranging for Colombia to amend their Constitution in order to let him run for a third term, too, after having them just rewrite it to allow him to run for an unprecidented (until now) 2nd term!

Oh, no! We don't get the "recitation of grievances" for right-wing Presidents of Latin America, do we? We really need to get down to the bottom of this, don't we?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
4. Seems like it is easy for folks to be brain washed with the Bush, Roberton, msm anti-Chavez
propaganda that is constantly being pumped into us every day. From some of the comments that I read on posts regarding Chavez, there are even quit a few folks here that have bought into it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-05-07 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yes it is very eye opening that the propaganda even works here..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I actually don't think that the corporate propaganda works all that well at DU.
I'd say there are three groups: 1) Those who provide information, have a detailed understanding of events in South America, including Venezuela, who generally provide links to information sources, and who generally approve of the Chavez government; 2) Those who seem to know little or nothing--just a few snippets here and there, that seem to come straight from Condoleeza Rice, via AP--these are always anti-Chavez, always very short and uninformative, and often snide and dismissive; and 3) Those who mostly lurk, curious about the issue, looking for information.

Group 2 are quick to jump into any Chavez thread with their "dictator" 'talking point,' and often try to get some kind of personal fight going--name-calling and so forth. When they are challenged on facts, they simply dissolve. They have no facts. And they seem much more numerous than I think they really are. Does somebody pay them to do this? Could be. It certainly feels that way at times.

There are a few in Group 2 who seem genuinely upset about Chavez. I pushed one of these commenters recently to try to figure out what the basis of it was. (Because there really is no arguing with the facts that Chavez is a genuinely elected, genuinely supported, law-abiding leader, who represents the great majority of Venezuelans.) What it came down to, in that particular case, was Chavez's support for Iran. I won't go into all that. I just want to make the point that some Chavez bashers have other agendas--another one being anti-Castro Cuban-Americans. In these two cases, the commenters don't seem to grant Venezuela the right to have its own, sovereign, foreign relations policy. And they don't seem to object to the U.S. allying itself with the worst, most tyrannical regimes in the Middle East--Saudi Arabia, the UAE--or the Far East, Pakistan. (Iran is mild by comparison to those three.) And they seem oblivious to events in South America--where the U.S. supports truly bad, corrupt governments like those in Colombia and Peru, and has always supported brutality and fascism (especially the Reaganites and Bushites). Chavez doesn't do any of this crap--throwing dissenters out of airplanes, chainsawing union organizers and throwing their body parts into mass graves, 'disappearing' thousands of people, slaughtering tens of thousands of indian villagers, assassinating legitimate leaders--crimes that U.S. supported Latin American regimes have frequently committed (to this day). Chavez is a law-abiding president strongly committed to human and civil rights. Why do they pick on HIM--and not the REAL tyrants of this world?

Anyway, my point is that some posters are actually concerned about something else, and know very little about Chavez (except for these few items that intersect with their main concerns). The bulk of Group 2 really do behave like operatives--and their articulation of their point of view is about as eloquent and literate as Bush's. And that pretty much gives them away. They are not interested in information or dialogue. They do "hit and run" posts--repeating Bushite memes in the classic mode of "Big Lie" propaganda. And I don't think they represent many people--here at DU, or in the population at large.

I think most people who post at DU--or read DU--and, indeed, most Americans in general--are pretty intelligent and far better informed that they are given credit for. I don't think this kind of stupidity appeals to them, or convinces them. They may be uninformed on some matter (--and many north Americans are badly informed about Latin America, unfortunately), but they are willing to listen, and willing to absorb facts and are seeking the truth. I think the human brain despises propaganda. It may be poisoned by it, for a while. But propaganda becomes tiresome. It is disrespectful. It is boring and repetitive. And the minds craves activity. It yearns to figure things out for itself. My experience is that most DUers are this way--anxious to learn, and wanting to escape the fascist propaganda they are subjected to. These DUers may say very little--merely thanking someone for links, or for a thoughtful comment. It's hard to judge their numbers, but I would guess that it's the vast majority.

DU is an open forum, which has its glories. I love the openness of this forum, even when it gets hit with trolls. Like my dear rightwing Bushite brother (now deceased), they make me think and investigate. I've asked myself a million times, "Are they right about Chavez? Is he really a 'Stalin' in the making?" And, from there, I search out the facts--and have concluded that these anti-Chavez posters are 100% wrong. Not just partly wrong. REALLY wrong. And that, too, makes me think and investigate. (Okay, where is the lie coming from? And who, among those who repeat it, are just innocently miming what they read/see/hear in the corporate monopoly news, or who is being malicious, and why?)

"Eye opening" it is, as you say. But it is also heartening that so many people are seeking an alternative to the corporate crap that gets shoved at them day and night, and want to know the truth and want to think for themselves. I think there are lots and lots of us. I think we are the great majority.

Way back when Bush invaded Iraq, I asked myself this question: Are the American people swallowing this crap? Have my fellow Americans become idiots and know-nothings, goosestepping to Bush? Or is something else going on?

It was an important question to me--because the answer to it contains the remedy. If Americans had gone fascist, then what was needed was long term educational efforts, to help de-program them, and to re-enforce their independent thinking skills. But if they had NOT gone fascist, then what the hell was wrong with them? How could they let this stupid little usurper go prancing around holding his jock strap, and sending the U.S. military to slaughter a half a million innocent people? How had they become so powerless, so demoralized--and, most important of all, as it turns out--so DISENFRANCHISED?

I did a lot of poll reading--and was absolutely amazed at what I found out. (The vast majority of Americans are still peace-minded, justice-minded and progressive.) Then I started looking into the voting system, as 2004 approached. And the answer to the above is, basically, that the American people have been disenfranchised, literally. Their votes are not being counted correctly, and now the fascists have installed highly sophisticated electronic voting machines, run on 'TRADE SECRET' code, owned and controlled by rightwing Bushite corporations--to fiddle the vote counts at will, however they need to be fiddled, to keep the war and the fascist policy going.

This electronic voting coup was done UNDER THE RADAR of the American people--the most black-holed story in the history of journalism. So I don't blame the people--except maybe a little bit, for not being vigilant enough. (Prosperity lulls you.) It was a conspiracy of BOTH party leaderships. This made it nearly impossible for the American people to know. After 2004, though, a lot of people started getting onto it, and a great election integrity movement is under way. That's my America. If you can SEE the problem, then the problem can be fixed. Progressive America. Creative America. Can-do America. Passionately democratic America.

And that will happen with Chavez and the Bolivarian Revolution, too. In fact, not only will the Bolivarian Revolution be vindicated, in this country, as the peaceful, democratic, social justice revolution that it is--and as one of the greatest peoples' movements that has ever occurred in the western hemisphere--it's going to transform our country as well. It's only a matter of time before our people also become totally fed up with the Corporate Rulers, and peacefully rebel, and start creating something better. The Bolivarians are showing us the way. And THAT is why the corporate media focuses on this one guy, Chavez--and demonizes him, and ignores all the rest. The People. That's who they really fear. That's who has really created this peaceful revolution. In Venezuela, in Bolivia, in Ecuador, in Argentina, and throughout the south. The PEOPLE of South America. And if they can do it--who have suffered so much from fascism regimes--so can we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. If the small, elitist European descended ruling class had not gotten so greedy, so hostile
toward the massive, darker-skinned poor of their country, if they hadn't pushed them beyond endurance so that in 1989 they had no choice but to run into the streets in protest, only to be mowed down by Venezuelan President Carlos Andres Perez' troops, this Bolivarian revolution would have been slower in coming.

It started well before Hugo Chavez was sworn in as President of Venezuela in 1999, and it will continue, as the people themselves have said, well beyond his Presidency.

Right-wing Americans who attempt to personalize the plight of the poor in Venezuela as depending on one person are abysmally simplistic, and uninformed. It should be illegal to be that wrong! This is huge, it covers far more than one country, involves millions and millions of people, and they will NOT continue to be divided and conquered by U.S. covert operations and intervention.

I hope you are right about the majority of Americans seeking the truth. You are very positive in your faith in them. I hope they are strong enough to really deserve that kind of respect, and will be looking for answers in the future, rather than swallowing what the oligarchy tells the coporate media it can publish.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-06-07 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kicking for Peace Patriot's post #6.
:kick: :kick: :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC