Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush signs $555 billion spending bill, funds operations into next year

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:00 PM
Original message
Bush signs $555 billion spending bill, funds operations into next year
Source: AP

CRAWFORD, Texas (AP) — President Bush on Wednesday signed a $555 billion bill that funds the Iraq war well into next year and keeps government agencies running through next September.

Bush’s signature on the massive spending bill capped a long-running battle with the Democratic-run Congress as he left boarded Air Force One to fly from his Maryland mountaintop retreat and flew to his Texas ranch here to see in the new year.

Bush had deep reservations about special “earmark” spending in the bill, but signed it into law nevertheless.

“The omnibus (bill) funds the government at responsible levels that the president proposed without raising taxes,” White House spokesman Scott Stanzel told reporters traveling to Texas with Bush.

Stanzel said that although he signed the bill, Bush continues to be “disappointed with Congress’ addiction to earmarks.”

“And soon the president will outline his fiscal year 2009 budget proposal,” the spokesman added, “which will hold the line on spending, keep taxes low and continue us on the path to a balanced budget.”

Read more: http://www.nwherald.com/articles/2007/12/26/news/nation_and_world/doc477294bf54eda601797901.txt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Earmarks = Anything that doesn't further Bush's global campaign of destruction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. This just makes my blood boil. When's Pelosi up for re-election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Reps are elected every 2 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. "and continue us on the path to a balanced budget.”
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enid602 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. mark of the beast
He settled on $555B bvecause he figgered $666B would be a bit much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
5. All labor provisions were stripped from the bill, however...
...I'm still working without a contract and expect to be for some time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockybelt Donating Member (938 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is "Cut and run congress"
Ass-holes all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. “disappointed with Congress’ addiction to earmarks.”
Hey GW- We're "disappointed" with your bosses' addiction to war for profit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
9. He'll just use a new signing statement to move funding around as he sees fit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
focusfan Donating Member (884 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
10. and the s.o.b is disappointed with congress ????
Edited on Wed Dec-26-07 06:36 PM by focusfan
us the american people should be disappointed with congress
and the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diclotican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-26-07 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. sabra
sabra


The good news is that the next 50 year, no republican can claim the party to be the party of responsible budget. And If they are to claim so, all "LIBERAL" Can take the whole number to what mr Bush have spended the 8 year he was inn office.. And off to the road with the republican... AKA he would be quit for a long time, and be ashamed big time...

What a wast of money, who should have been used to rebuild New Orleans, who could have been used to rebuild infrastructure in US...

But hey, wast money in a futile war, thats ok for republican...

Diclotican

Sorry my bad English, not my native language
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC