Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House passes domestic partnership expansion bill (WA)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 01:08 AM
Original message
House passes domestic partnership expansion bill (WA)
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 01:18 AM by uppityperson
Source: Seattle Times

OLYMPIA, Wash. — The House on Friday passed a measure to expand the state's domestic partnership law by granting same-sex couples more than 170 of the benefits and responsibilities given to married couples. The bill passed on a 62-32 vote after very little debate, and now goes to the Senate.

The measure adds domestic partners to sections of laws where previously only spouses were mentioned, including areas referring to probate and trusts, community property and homestead exemptions, and guardianship and powers of attorney. The underlying domestic partnership law, passed last year, already provides hospital visitation rights, the ability to authorize autopsies and organ donations, and inheritance rights when there is no will.

(clip)

The measure makes dozens of changes to state law, including requiring domestic partners of public officials to submit financial disclosure forms, just as the spouses of heterosexual officials do. It also would give domestic partners the same spousal testimony rights that married couples have, allowing domestic partners the right to refuse to testify against each other in court.

Opponents argued that expanding the current law dilutes traditional marriage. "This measure will have a negative impact on our families, it will have a negative impact on the Defense of Marriage Act and a negative impact on society," said Rep. Bob Sump, R-Republic.

Lawmakers rejected two amendments, including one that would have required the measure to be approved by voters. Under the measure, the process of ending a domestic partnership also would be changed, allowing the secretary of state to end partnerships only in the first five years, with several more restrictions relating to children, real property or unpaid debts. All other partnerships would be dissolved in superior court — similar to conventional divorce.

Read more: http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004184982_webdomestic15.html



More in article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bravo!
:applause:

Baby steps, baby steps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. it's a good start. at least this, right? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetheonlyway Donating Member (948 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
3. Even Better, is that WA is 2-3 Votes away from Full Marriage Protection
the whole 1400 enchilada.

Equal Rights Washington *** bravo ***

i'm so proud to hail from the most progressive gay state in the nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. kick for day crew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. kick & recommended. good article. and great going washington! (eom)
Edited on Sat Feb-16-08 01:36 PM by leQ
edit = typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mattfromnossa Donating Member (125 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good news.
I support this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
7. ... allowing domestic partners the right to refuse to testify against each other in court...
That particular law is actually very narrowly defined and very rarely used.

But because of popular crime TV shows, it captures the public's imagination.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LifeIsSweet Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-16-08 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Being a Gay single parent I'm glad to see this great news but...

we are still not equal

Is that to much to ask?

Should we have to ask?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC