|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
ious (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 04:56 PM Original message |
Obama Hits Clinton on NAFTA Support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
From The Left (670 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
1. Hillary Has Supported NAFTA for Years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joyce78 (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
18. Iraq Funding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:47 PM Response to Reply #18 |
41. Obama voted against the first supplemental to come before the Senate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKthatsIT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
32. Excuse me but Obama supports NAU,and NAFTA, too |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Akimbo2112 (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 05:53 PM Response to Original message |
2. Do you think..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rosetta627 (515 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #2 |
5. Again, Kucinich's platform is even better |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BearSquirrel2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:36 PM Response to Reply #5 |
19. I also think revision is most appropriate ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:48 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. Hillary was for NAFTA . . before she was against it (now). -n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mdmc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. I support fair trade |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kotsu (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 06:36 PM Response to Original message |
4. Having cake |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
daleo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
6. He's against it, but he won't change it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:29 PM Response to Reply #6 |
12. Then people need to ask him point blank what he plans to do about NAFTA nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
parkeradison (82 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:13 PM Response to Original message |
7. Obama and Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:15 PM Response to Original message |
8. Obama is hypocritical as usual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:21 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. NAFTA isn't the problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:31 PM Response to Reply #9 |
13. Agreed. The WTO needs some looking at as well. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bulloney (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:49 PM Response to Reply #9 |
15. NAFTA has some provisions that accelerated companies' decision to move operations to Mexico. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:03 PM Response to Reply #9 |
16. You're right, but Clinton was implicated in everything, including GATT & WTO all of which he |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
36. OK I'm stupid... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 09:03 PM Response to Reply #36 |
45. Here it is..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. Wow that's just categorically false. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
33. If we lost so many jobs to Mexico why are so many Mexicans sneaking into the US? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eilen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 07:18 AM Response to Reply #33 |
39. It started with NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Feb-26-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #39 |
46. Sorry but I don't buy it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberal4truth (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:08 PM Response to Reply #9 |
29. WTF!!! NAFTA was a complete sell-out of Amercian jobs no matter what party you blame !! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OKthatsIT (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
34. Come on...NAFTA is too the problem. And a problem we can stop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Croquist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:46 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. I don't remember India signing NAFTA, Correct me if I'm wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sarcasmo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:23 PM Response to Original message |
10. Go at Her with the truth, kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
L0oniX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:33 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. Indeed. Keep nailing her with NAFTA ..and the Iraq war vote.n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 07:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. Does Obama mean it? Will he do something about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:02 PM Response to Reply #11 |
23. So you think that one man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sarah Ibarruri (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:26 PM Response to Reply #23 |
26. I would hope he would express his distaste for such treaties and study modifications to same nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:12 PM Response to Reply #11 |
40. No, he won't help |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joyce78 (497 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:18 PM Response to Original message |
17. I've had it with Obama and Michelle ... I'm just tired of people like these two ...phonies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 08:48 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Hey look, more substanceless personal attacks! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. I think you will find |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 03:51 PM Response to Reply #22 |
43. The blood of 1,000,000+ Iraqi civilians is drip, drip, dripping from |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Feb-25-08 04:10 PM Response to Reply #43 |
44. And GWB |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:02 PM Response to Original message |
24. Neither are my first choice but ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zhade (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:36 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. Well, Clinton's suggested she can pick her own presidential powers. Obama hasn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #35 |
38. I do not know what you are talking about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
25. Hilary won't do well in Ohio because of NAFTA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
durrrty libby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:28 PM Response to Original message |
27. In 2004 BO not only supported NAFTA, he said it should be expanded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 09:35 PM Response to Original message |
28. Mexico can give back those jobs and we can give back AZ, NM, TX and CA. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosa Luxemburg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
30. Many people don't know what NAFTA is! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Feb-24-08 10:26 PM Response to Original message |
31. I don't why Dem infighting is headline. We should be talking about Seigelman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:31 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC