Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Edwards Has Not Ruled Out V.P. Run

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:41 PM
Original message
Edwards Has Not Ruled Out V.P. Run
Source: ABC News

Edwards Has Not Ruled Out V.P. Run

June 15, 2008 12:18 PM

ABC News' Mary Bruce reports: 2004 Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards this morning left open the possibility of a second run for the position. "I'd take anything he asked me to think about seriously," Edwards explained in a "This Week" interview with George Stephanopoulos.

The former 2008 presidential candidate was quick to clarify, however, that he is not actively pursuing the job. "But obviously this is something I've done and it's not a job that I'm seeking."

As the veepstakes continue to heat up, Edwards said Obama should be left to make an independent decision. "Senator Obama ... has earned the right to make this decision for himself. I think he has enormous choices available to him, really great choices available to him. And I think he'll go through this process in a thoughtful, orderly way, and he'll decide who he wants to be his running mate. And that's exactly how it should be done."

In a separate interview, former Republican presidential candidate Fred Thompson offered a more emphatic response on his vice presidential intentions. "It's presumptuous for a person to turn down things that haven't been offered to them, and I don't think will be offered," he said. "It's not something that I want."

Read more: http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/06/edwards-has-not.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Edwards would be his best possible pick. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
klyon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. agreed
leave the people in the house and senate and pick someone other. Edwards would be my first pick also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Wootie woot woot!
:applause: K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CANDO Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. I love Edwards as VP
Strong advocate for the little guy. Webb of Virginia would be great for his military background. Or Wesley Clark also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kimmylavin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. I would LOVE it if Obama asked Edwards.
Edwards was my choice in the Primaries - even though he'd already dropped out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. How can this be late breaking news when grantcart posted the same story at 12:28
and somebody else posted it earlier? I bet I'll see it posted again later today, though.
(Sorry, this is one of my pet peeves here: seeing the exact same story or news posted over and over and over like it's for the first time.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. I hope that Obama gives him serious consideration for any position
in his administration whether VP, Atty. Gen. or any other cabinet position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. My Second Choice. First being Edwards/ Obama
:beer:

Here's hoping
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
10. Fine by me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connonym Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. Edwards was my first choice for president so I'd be ecstatic to see him on the ticket
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. It would be a great choice
Obama/Edwards 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peaches2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
13. Will never happen (and I love JE, too)
JE running for VP just would bring back memories of a losing candidacy just 4 yrs ago. Obama needs to go for the 'surprise' experienced face. JE Cabinet? Absolutely and that will happen, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #13
28. It also would bring back the attacks of this primary season
It was only in the last month, at most, that Edwards was not the attacker - and some of those attacks were on Obama. Then after he was out there were the leaked comments that he "didn't think Obama was ready" - which was utter chutzpah because he had LESS experience and was on his second run. So, one would think he thought that he was ready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Fuck, fuckitty, fuck fuck
I hate this muddying of the waters.

We already have a Presidential candidate. We don't need another.

This isn't about finding good people, it's about selecting a VP who complements our nominee. Edwards is a fine candidate, but he doesn't bring anything Obama needs to the ticket.

Some say the ticket needs "experience". I disagree, but Edwards doesn't bring it.

Some say the ticket needs appeal to rural voters. This, I agree with...and Edwards doesn't bring it.


My point is that Edwards is a fine man and a fine candidate but he does nothing for an Obama ticket. Regardless of anybody's personal feelings towards him, it's not about the actual person at this point...it's about how that person adds to our nominee's strengths and compensates for his weaknesses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. What article are you reading?
Obviously not the same one we are.

Edwards is not ruling being VP (it's a double-negative but that's OK in this context). This has nothing to do with the Presidential candidate - this has already been decided.

An Obama/Edwards ticket would be perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. That would work for me!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Perfect Profile: Obama/Edwards 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Edwards brings enough for me
He really "won" the last election with John Kerry.

He brings the same message of HOPE and CHANGE for America.

I am so tired of red states/blue states

Pew and Survey and CNN and what Tweety thinks---

I just saw that stupid.lying GW on a 2004 interview with Tim Russet ~ that idiot lowered all the bars for experience and every other "measure" that MSOwned by Bushes" America tries to push down our stomachs!

The only thing we need to get busy measuring is Diebold.

Only Diebold gave that election to Bush!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. The question is how much he helped Kerry
The question I would have is whether he would agree that - sight unseen - he would agree that he would use ANY slogan that Obama chooses. I am disturbed that Edwards proudly told the NYT in Nov 2007, that he refused to use Kerry's "help is on the way" because he thought that his "hope is on the way" was better. This resulted in the criticism of the campaign. Though it bothers me that he did this because it sends a kind of this was the tip of the iceberg message of loose cannon VP, what almost bothers me more is that 3 years later - he, not Kerry, an anonymous insider or Shrum told this story. That means that even in retrospect he doesn't get the role of VP.

Now, this year, he has said and signaled that he himself is not impressed by Obama. Why would he give the proper deference to Obama that he did not give to the older, more experienced Kerry? I think he bought his own PR and really believed he was the best natural politician of his generation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Txs for the info ~ I still like him
and this is a new election, new circumstances.

He did come out to support Obama near the end of the Primary and I hope that he will be considered for an important role,if not VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. It is a new election
Edited on Sun Jun-15-08 05:01 PM by karynnj
but the question is whether he "gets" the role of VP. In the example given, you would need to either decide that he would respect Obama's judgment more than Kerry's or that since Dec 2007, he became more humble. (Watch Daschle and Kerry - both more senior politicians when they act as surrogates. Both speak for Obama and make the issue Obama, not themselves. That takes a certain humility that likely doesn't come easily to people who are high level politicians.

My point is that the kindest interpretation is that Edwards did not see why this was counterproductive - even 3 years later. That means he will likely do something similar if nominated again. The problem for the Presidential nominee is that by the time the person first acts as VP, it is already too late to replace him. Kerry and his people, likely had to try to keep things as smooth as possible - hiding any irritation they felt. To do otherwise would kill the campaign. A sign that this was not the only instance was that NONE of the Kerry people went to Edwards when he opted out. These people, who had run the last campaign - which was run in an environment extremely different than the 1990s were sought by all the campaigns - and the majority went to Obama, with some sitting it out and a few going to HRC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TooRaLoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
18. I would be really happy with Edwards. He was a good Prez candidate, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrispyQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
20. I think Edwards would be a fine selection. --nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. Edwards would work for me!
Hell - he'd work for ALL OF US. Just try to imagine that for a moment.... a VP that works FOR the people instead of AGAINST the people!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburnblu Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
25. Edwards also has minimal experience
Edwards was a great pick for Kerry. Edwards would be a great pick if Obama began his time in the senate ten years ago. Biden, Richardson, Rendell or Dodd would be better. Edwards and Biden both voted for the war so that isn't a plus over Biden. Maybe Edwards brings a little bit of a populist boost, but one well timed, "hey Mr. Edwards why did you feel the need to post pictures of your 27,000 square foot residence on your campign site, doesn't that maybe you part of the other America you are always raling against", and he looks like a bad pick. That and his I joined a hedge fund to learn about poor people, yikes. Was it a hedge fund that invested in poor areas in the U.S. and developing countries, uh no not that I recall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
26. Would help pull the south
My first choice but then I am not making the choice so I will sit with the rest of you and speculate but support the final decision. The one to get Obama in the white house
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-15-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Just like he did in 2004?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-16-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. I could have sworn that he already had ruled it out, long ago. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC