Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Threatens To Veto `Homes For Heroes` Housing Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
DogPoundPup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 08:20 PM
Original message
White House Threatens To Veto `Homes For Heroes` Housing Bill
Source: Dow Jones newswires

WASHINGTON -(Dow Jones)- The White House threatened to veto legislation that would provide housing assistance to poor veterans, calling the bill "well intentioned," but flawed.


The measure, expected to be considered by the House Wednesday, would make rental vouchers available to homeless vets, create a new position at the Department of Housing and Urban Development to deal with veterans' issues, and provide assistance to private nonprofit groups to expand housing for low-income veterans.


In a statement of administration policy, the White House's Office of Management and Budget said the Homes for Heroes Act would duplicate programs already in place at HUD. It said HUD awarded more than $730 million to projects for homeless vets last year, while the Veterans Administration expects to spend more than $300 million this year.


The administration's primary gripe with the bill, however, is that it would apply prevailing wage requirements to the construction of units with funds authorized by the legislation. The White House has long opposed attempts to expand the so-called Davis-Bacon wage requirements.

*note: this is the complete extent of the article

Read more: http://www.lloyds.com/dj/DowJonesArticle.aspx?id=397262



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. When you look at the Davis Beacon wage requirements you can
see why this prick doesn't like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I believe that's Davis-Bacon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmondine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Here's a test to see if HUD is adequate for homeless vets
If there are still homeless vets, it's not.
End... of... story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. he's going to veto because he doesn't want to pay prevailing wages?
What a fucking douchebag, to be blunt. IPU forbid we provide just and fair compensation to people. Nope, we can't have that. We need to pay the serfs less, while tossing more and more billions at the feudal KBR Gods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saigon68 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. He's an Insult to honest hardworking Douchbags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. he probably doesn't even use a douche...
he's one of those pretentious douches that uses a bidet.... fucking douchebag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. You are assuming a lot by even thinking he* cleans himself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. ....he's just a bag. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-09-08 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope that fucker has to suffer before he dies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. The Davis-Bacon Act...
Edited on Thu Jul-10-08 12:39 AM by guruoo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis-Bacon_Act

'The Davis-Bacon Act of 1931 is a United States federal law which established the requirement for paying prevailing wages on public works projects. All federal government construction contracts, and most contracts for federally assisted construction over $2,000, must include provisions for paying workers on-site no less than the locally prevailing wages and benefits paid on similar projects.

The act is named after its Republican sponsors, James "Puddler Jim" Davis, a Senator from Pennsylvania and a former Secretary of Labor under three presidents, and Representative Robert L. Bacon of Long Island, New York.'

snip

'In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, House Representatives Jeff Flake, Tom Feeney, Marilyn Musgrave, and other members of the House Republican Study Committee (RSC) urged President Bush to temporarily suspend the Davis-Bacon Act in order to expedite the reconstruction of the Gulf Coast.<11> <12> President George W. Bush then issued proclamation 7924 to indefinitely suspend the provisions of 40 U.S.C. 3141-3148 (the Davis–Bacon Act) in designated areas in the States of Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi, the areas most heavily hit by the hurricane.'

snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
8. Corporatists have always detested the Davis-Bacon Act because of the prevailing-wages requirement.
Corporate types always want to keep labor costs as low as possible, the lowest if possible. However, Davis-Bacon made it so that if they contract with the federal government, they can't pay below a certain floor it establishes, which means they don't get to squeeze workers as hard as they could have before 1931. That pisses them off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BayjanDem Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is beyond evil
This is...is this how we treat ours? :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Danger Mouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Scum. Scum. That's all he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
13. "If we can't use slave labor to build it, it ain't getting built!"
Who the Fuck ARE WE???????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. There's one HUGE problem with Shrub's argument...
"Prevailing wages" ain't what they used to be.

The prevailing wage for contracts on Fort Bragg is $9 per hour. For that you need five years experience and your own tools.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-10-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. Let's face it....this legislation that would help soldiers and their
families will not pass until Obama is President. McCain will do nothing for the soldiers.

* would rather see our soldiers just like our NO residents live in those shitty formaldehyde trailers.

This administration is anti-American and I don't know what more it takes for the rest of America.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC