thebaghwan
(998 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:02 PM
Original message |
Democrats Increase Pressure on Scalia |
Faygo Kid
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:08 PM
Response to Original message |
1. This isn't even close. I am a lawyer. Where is the ABA? |
|
My God, this isn't even a close call. We know a cabal is trying to take over the country; Scalia is clearly part of it. This is ridiculous, that this should even be an issue - of course he needs to recuse himself. Where is the American Bar Association on this?
|
Birthmark
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Can the Bar Association disbar Scalia... |
|
...if he doesn't recuse himself?
|
banana republican
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
18. The Bar Assn can recommend Disbaring. |
|
Edited on Sat Jan-31-04 11:53 PM by banana republican
I knew someone who was involved with a bar assn. disciplinary matter. it was subsequently dismissed by the state supreme court as being without merit.
Someone needs to file a complaint with the state bar assn where S* is licensed to practice. They would investigate and recommend actions to be taken. This is usually done as a "trial" before an administrative judge. The judges recommendation is the forwarded to the state bar assn. The state bar assn imposes any sanctions deemed appropriate. the sanctions are then appealed through the courts to the state supreme court.
SOMEONE PLEASE FILE A COMPLAINT....
It would be real interesting to see what happens to a SCROTUS justice who was not licensed to practice....
|
Peregrine
(712 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-01-04 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #18 |
|
There is no constitutional requirement for Bar membership, much less a law degree.
|
saigon68
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. They are part of the CABAL of course they will do nothing |
LiberalFighter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. The Federalist Society is part of that cabal |
pacifictiger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
do you wonder why this issue not raised on the 1 vote majority supreme court decision at the time of the 2000 selection fiasco? Was it because no one realized the close friendship with cheney at the time?
|
Democat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
4. They used the law against Clinton, but not Cheney? |
|
From the article:
Federal law requires judges to stay out of cases in which their "impartiality might reasonably be questioned." The law was used in Arkansas in the 1990s to remove judges with ties to President Clinton...
|
0007
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
10. What's wrong with that? These guys are professionals |
|
and can put their affinities behind them. (This is a joke!!)
|
forgethell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:20 PM
Response to Original message |
5. What kind of pressure can you put on a SC Justice? |
|
I really want to know this. These people are a little higher than GOD, and act like it.
|
BeFree
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Take it to the streets!
How I wished I lived near DC.
But a concentrated e-mail campaign may make the distance a bit less of a problem, if we could all get organized. Any good organizers out there?
|
forgethell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
13. That still doesn't pressure them |
|
if it did, there would still be segregation!
|
Malva Zebrina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I'm not a lawyer and know nothing about the law |
|
but it is obvious to me that if Scalia does not recuse himself, the entire system is broken. I think Scalia does not deserve to sit on the court. Is there any way he can be ousted? Do we have to suffer his presence there, knowing he is in cahoots with Cheney, having dinner with him and going on vacations with him, while pretending to be a "justice"? I mean that is as arrogant as much of the Bush administration. Complete disregard for this country.
Are we the little people the only ones who seem to care about the principles we believe are behind this country?
Are the rich and the well born and the well placed the ones who will tell us where and what we have to do in order to survive at a pittance level according to thier arrogance of power?
|
Gman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
7. It really doesn't matter at all |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-30-04 05:25 PM by Gman
because if Cheney wins with Scalia, he wins. Don't forget Scalia was the driving force behind the 2000 selection. Yeah, there will be an outcry and then it'll be forgotten.
If Cheney wins without Scalia, he's home free.
If Cheney loses with or without Scalia, Cheney will still claim the SCOTUS doesn't have authority over the Executive Branch and he'll still refuse to release the documents. What's gonna happen? Its not like Congress will do something. Even if they did, it would be the same argument that the Exective Branch is above all. Is Ashcroft going to kick in the front door of the VP residence and confiscate everthing?
If they lose they'll scream about the tyranny of the courts and unelected judges to rally their base in November all the while claiming they have a responsibility to the country to refuse to release the documents.
So it really doesn't matter.
Everything is topsy turvy. Read my sig line.
|
rock
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 05:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Apparently, impeaching the Supremes is like the weather |
pinto
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-30-04 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
11. look to your Congressmen for redress on this one, Waxman and Conyers |
|
have spoken up, but it'll take more voices from the Hill to make a difference. Do what you do, write, email, call....
|
dusty64
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 09:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
been a more unqualified and extremist "justice" in modern history. What needs to be done to remove him? I don't worry about the replacement, it can't possibly be any worse.
|
Nlighten1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Bookmark this thread...when the SC gets the "Energy" case... |
|
see if Scalia recuses himself...if he doesn't and votes against the people...we are going to have a big problem...
|
ElsewheresDaughter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 06:01 PM
Response to Original message |
17. check this dick/tony pic out |
The_Casual_Observer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jan-31-04 11:50 PM
Response to Original message |
19. The best pressure on Scalia |
|
Would probably be due to a depth of 1000 ft of ocean water. He selected bush didn't he??
|
MurikanDemocrat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-01-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message |
20. He just blatantly flaunts corruption |
|
If ever a case screamed for recusal, this one does.
|
demgrrrll
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-01-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #20 |
21. Why not write to the other justices to see if they will apply pressure |
|
on one of their own. Especially Justice O'Conner, who I believe was very disturbed by the outpouring of mail she received after the 2000 selection. Let them know that his action will be part of their legacy. Never know, might work. I would be willing to write to someone.
|
Qutzupalotl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Feb-01-04 12:34 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Kennedy and O'Connor are centrists who have their respect. Souder would do it too, but I sense animosity between them.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message |