Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Court rules Army not liable for shooting by young recruit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 02:00 PM
Original message
Court rules Army not liable for shooting by young recruit
Source: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

A federal court says the U.S. Army is not liable for more than $1 million in medical bills for Michael Lahoff, who was left a quadriplegic after being robbed and shot by a young Army recruit in Downtown Pittsburgh.

Three judges from the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday dismissed a lawsuit against the Army that was brought by an insurance company that is paying for Mr. Lahoff's medical care and lost wages.

Continental Casualty Co. claimed the Army, under pressure to meet recruiting quotas, signed up an unstable 18-year-old named Marty Allen Armstrong and inadvertently gave him access to a pistol.

Mr. Armstrong enlisted in the Army's delayed entry program while a student at Peabody High School. The Army recruited him even though court records showed he had been charged with aggravated sexual assault and two cases of disorderly conduct at age 13. He then underwent psychiatric care.

-----

His recruiter, Staff Sgt. Korey Lewis, allowed Mr. Armstrong to move into his apartment, violating an order from a superior, according to the lawsuit. While staying with the sergeant, Mr. Armstrong stole a 9 mm pistol.

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/08206/899166-53.stm



This is one that makes you go h'mmmm. I think the Sgt is responsible but he probably has little money. But was so much pressure put on him by his superiors and the Army that he was taking chances on very questionable recruits?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TechBear_Seattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Inadvertently" gave him access to a pistol?
Isn't that like "inadvertently" giving an employee something to do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC