Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House cannot delay aides' testimony: judge

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:05 PM
Original message
White House cannot delay aides' testimony: judge
Source: Reuters

White House cannot delay aides' testimony: judge

Tue Aug 26, 4:58 PM ET

A U.S. judge ruled against the Bush administration in its fight with Congress over a probe into the firings of U.S. attorneys by refusing on Tuesday to delay an order that current and former White House aides comply with congressional subpoenas.

Federal judge John Bates ruled that he would not put off his July order that former White House counsel Harriet Miers testify to Congress, and that Chief of Staff Josh Bolten surrender documents related to the 2006 firings.

He said on Tuesday that the administration had failed to make its case that the order should be delayed while the administration appeals it.

Bates said the White House should now turn over requested documents and urged negotiations with Congress over Miers' testimony, in what has become one of the fiercest battles in the Bush administration's effort to strengthen presidential and executive-branch powers.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20080826/pl_nm/usa_congress_bush_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Bush administration has stepped on the wrong toes. Ouch!
Edited on Tue Aug-26-08 08:08 PM by JDPriestly
Has Bush complied with the Supreme Court decisions on Guantanamo and habeas corpus yet? Or is the administration just kind of holding court on its own without regard for any other branch of government. Does the judiciary branch still exist in GWB's opinion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They are planning to appeal those Supreme Court decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Hoist by their own petard, BTW...
"Judge Bates was appointed United States District Judge in December 2001." Yep, he's Chimpy's appointee! :rofl: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Bush: Judiciary Has No Authority
Bush actually argued, to SCOTUS, that the judiciary has no authority over the President whenever the President thinks it's wartime. Oddly, SCOTUS shut that down 6-1 (Clarence Thomas is insane). But if Bush believes SCOTUS has no authority, then he can simply ignore the decision.

Woo-hoo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. apparently when in comes to Repigs, Mukasey feels the same way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtf80123 Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. God I hope these criminals get their assess dragged in
front of the Congress before the Election!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. Looks like the better not fuck around turning shit over now; they are under the Court's jurisdiction
Tee hee! And with that comes enforcement power! :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimshoes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
7. There is that quote by the inimitable Frank Zappa
Where they are almost to the point of removing all the scenery and revealing the brick wall at the back of the theater. The quote is below.


"The illusion of freedom will continue as long as it's profitable to continue the illusion. At the point where the illusion becomes too expensive to maintain, they will just take down the scenery, pull back the curtains, and you will see the brick wall at the back of the theater".
-- Frank Zappa
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. Hats off to the good Judge!
Edited on Tue Aug-26-08 08:57 PM by mzmolly
*ehem* ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissWaverly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. enough, just show up, no negotiations
go to my archived journal and read what Waxman said about the Clinton investigation, I have included a snip here.

Many of these documents were highly sensitive. The information Congress demanded and received included details of discussions between President Clinton and his closest advisors, internal e-mails from the Office of the Vice President, FBI interview notes, and documents describing internal Administration deliberations.

At one point, I asked GAO to assess how much White House time was involved in responding to congressional inquiries relating to allegations of campaign finance abuses over an 18-month period between 1996 and 1998.

GAO found that White House staff spent over 55,000 hours responding to hundreds of congressional requests. Government Reform and its Senate counterpart were the most visible investigative committees during this period.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-26-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-27-08 04:25 AM
Response to Original message
12. "If the government is trying to run out the clock on the 110th Congress..Judge Bates won't let them"
<snip>

"If the government is trying to run out the clock on the 110th Congress, today's decision suggests that Judge Bates won't let them," said Stephen Vladeck, a law professor at American University.

Rep. John Conyers, Jr., D-Mich., chair of the House Judiciary Committee, praised the decision and pledged to schedule a hearing for Miers shortly.

"I am heartened that Judge Bates recognized that the public interest in this matter is best served by the furtherance of the Committee's investigation," he said in a statement.

<more>

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=5661658&page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC