Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Historic Disapproval: Bush Hits All-Time Low Amid Economic Meltdown

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:12 PM
Original message
Historic Disapproval: Bush Hits All-Time Low Amid Economic Meltdown
Edited on Tue Sep-30-08 09:13 PM by Amerigo Vespucci
Source: ABC News

Just two presidents have had lower approval (Richard Nixon and Harry Truman) than President Bush, and none has had higher disapproval in polls since 1938.

McCain's problem: Fifty-three percent of registered voters think he'd lead the country in the same direction as Bush, inching back up over a majority.

Forty-eight percent of registered voters are uncomfortable about McCain's age, a new high. And while Obama has advanced since mid-June in the sense that he's a "safe" choice for president, to 55 percent, McCain has lost ground on this measure; 51 percent now see him as safe, down 6 points.

Obama continues to trounce McCain on enthusiasm. Sixty-one percent of Obama's supporters are very enthusiastic about their choice, vs. 38 percent of McCain's.

Read more: http://abcnews.go.com/PollingUnit/Politics/story?id=5920248&page=1



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Would you buy a used bank from this man? (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Not even a used pretzel. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm sure his numbers will rise again after that SPARKLING and
VISIONARY address he made this morning on the bail-out.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Someone enlighten me - What did Harry do to be included with these two? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. here's some background
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_S._Truman

here's some of it:

The end of World War II was followed in the United States by uneasy and contentious conversion back to a peacetime economy. The president was faced with a sudden renewal of labor-management conflicts that had lain dormant during the war years, severe shortages in housing and consumer products, and widespread dissatisfaction with inflation, which at one point hit six percent in a single month.<62> In this polarized environment, there was a wave of destabilizing strikes in major industries, and Truman's response to them was generally seen as ineffective.<62> In the spring of 1946, a national railway strike, unprecedented in the nation's history, brought virtually all passenger and freight lines to a standstill for over a month. When the railway workers turned down a proposed settlement, Truman seized control of the railways and threatened to draft striking workers into the armed forces.<63> While delivering a speech before Congress requesting authority for this plan, Truman received word that the strike had been settled on his terms.<63> He announced this development to Congress on the spot and received a tumultuous ovation that was replayed for weeks on newsreels. Although the resolution of the crippling railway strike made for stirring political theater, it actually cost Truman politically: his proposed solution was seen by many as high-handed; and labor voters, already wary of Truman's handling of workers' issues, were deeply alienated.
<snip>

When he left office in 1953, Truman was one of the most unpopular chief executives in history. His job approval rating of 22 percent in the Gallup Poll as of February 1952 was actually lower than Richard Nixon's was in August 1974 at 24 percent, the month that Nixon resigned. Public feeling toward Truman grew steadily warmer with the passing years, however, and the period shortly after his death consolidated a partial rehabilitation among both historians and members of the general public. Since leaving office, Truman has fared well in polls ranking the presidents. He has never been listed lower than ninth, and most recently was seventh in a Wall Street Journal poll in 2005. He has also had his critics. After a review of information available to Truman on the presence of espionage activities in the U.S. government, Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan concluded that Truman was "almost willfully obtuse" concerning the danger of American communism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Truman's numbers were at its lowest after he fired MacArthur
Personally, I think it was the right thing to do, but it was very unpopular at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Imagine a Pres today saying this...
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 02:03 AM by onager
Truman, after firing MacArthur:

"I didn't fire MacArthur because he was a stupid son-of-a-bitch. I fired him for disobeying orders. If I fired every stupid son-of-a-bitch in the Army, we wouldn't have any generals left."

Oh, or this: "Richard Nixon lies even when he doesn't need to, just to keep in practice."

"Nixon is a lying, double-dealing, shifty-eyed little son-of-a-bitch. And if the American people are ever dumb enough to elect him President, they deserve everything they get."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. War in Korea was a mess. Divided government Pukes return in Congress.
In addition there was an economic downturn. Red baiting was in full throttle. Harry spoke his mind. Harry was a real Maverick and he had a habit of cutting up his enemies with his tongue. He had a stubborn streak of honesty something that does not work well with modern politicians.

He rates much better today, Bush is hoping his reputation will someday be repaired like Harry Truman's or even Jimmy Carter. Not much chance of that George W. Bush is the worst of the worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Olney Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-30-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. He needs a long vacation away from my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. and his name is John THE BUSH REPUBLICAN McCain... keep them linked at the hips!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC